������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ Chapter Four
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Joannes Chrysostomus
Joannes Chrysostomus, is generally known as St. Chrysostom: Patriarch of Constantinople, one of the most celebrated of the Church Fathers, and the most eminent orator of the early Christian period; born 347 A.D. at Antioch; died September 14, 407, near Comana, in Pontus. Chrysostom originally devoted himself to the law, but soon felt dissatisfied with this vocation, and at the age of twenty‑three was made a deacon.
About fifteen years later (386 A.D.) he advanced to the rank of presbyter, and in 398 A.D. was appointed by the emperor Bishop of Constantinople. Having attacked the empress Eudoxia in his sermons, he was banished in 403 A.D., but was recalled soon after, upon the unanimous demand of his congregation. He repeated his attacks upon the empress, and was again banished in 404 A.D.; first to Nicaea, then to Cacusus in the desert of the Taurus, and finally to Pityos on the Black Sea; but he died while on the way to the last‑named place.
The name "Chrysostomus" ('golden‑mouthed'; = 'gold,' and = 'mouth') is a title of honor conferred on this Church father only. It was first used by Isidore of Seville in 636 A.D., and is significant of the importance of the man, whose sermons, of which one thousand have been preserved, are among the very best products of Christian rhetoric.
As a teacher of dogmatics and exegesis Chrysostom is not of so much importance, although much space in his works is devoted to these two branches. Among his sermons, the "Orationes VIII. Adversus Judaeos" deserve special notice, inasmuch as they mark a turning point in anti‑ Jewish polemics.
While up to that time the Church aspired merely to attack the dogmas of Judaism, and did that in a manner intended only for the learned, with Chrysostom there began the endeavor, which eventually brought so much suffering upon the Jews, to prejudice the whole of Christendom against the latter, and to erect hitherto unknown barriers between Jews and Christians. It was the existing friendly intercourse between Jews and Christians which impelled Chrysostom to his furious attacks upon the former.
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ Attack on Jews
Religious motives were not lacking, for many Christians were in the habit of celebrating the Feast of the
Blowing of the Shofar, or New Year, the Day of Atonement, and the Feast of Tabernacles.
��� "What forgiveness can we expect,' he exclaimed, 'when we run to their synagogues, merely following an impulse or a habit, and call their physicians and conjurers to our houses?' In another place Chrysostom says: 'I invoke heaven and earth as witnesses against you if any one of you should go to attend the Feast of the blowing of the Trumpets, or participate in the fasts, or the observance of the Sabbath, or observe an important or unimportant rite of the Jews, and I will be innocent of your blood.'
��� Not only had Chrysostom to combat the pro‑Jewish inclinations of the Antiochians in religious matters, but the Jews were held in so much respect at that time, that Christians preferred to bring their lawsuits before Jewish judges, because the form of the Jewish oath seemed to them more impressive and binding than their own." [1]
In a book entitled "Races in Europe," the author, William Z. Ripley, states under ethology:
"The findings of physical anthropology show that, contrary to popular view, there is no Jewish race...Our conclusion then is final. It is paradoxical yet true, we affirm. The Jews are not a Race, but only a People after all."
Perhaps it can be understood why The World Book Encyclopedia states:
"The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name Jew has lost all racial meaning."
From the above definitions it can be concluded that since the majority of people in modern Palestine and those who call themselves Jews are descendants from a "Turko‑Finn, Mongolian tribal people" from Khazaria, they have never been a Semitic people. Therefore anyone who would be critical or oppose them cannot be anti‑Semitic. They may be anti‑Khazarian, anti‑Jew, but certainly not anti‑Semitic.
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Opportunity Lost
The opportunity was being given to each of the three sons of Judah to prove their right to the throne. The male line of Pharez‑Judah had failed. The daughter of Zedekiah, the last king in Jerusalem, was united to the male line of Zarah‑Judah in Ireland. The Shelah‑Judah remnant was given their opportunity and proved their unworthiness by crucifying the Son of God, Jesus Christ, WHO WAS NOT A JEW, as He did not come from the Shelah line. Neither the Pharez branch nor the Zarah branch of Judah were Jews. The present House of Windsor has over it the combined line of Zarah‑Pharez. Thus we can clearly see that First the Pharez Branch was exalted Then the Shelah Branch and at Present the Zarah Branch is Exalted.
Notice that in verse 27 there are three overturns, i.e., from Pharez to Zarah and, while hidden in Ireland, from 580 B.C. to Christ, the Shelah line was given the opportunity to prove their worth. Three overturnings ‑ from Pharez to Shelah, from Shelah to Zarah and the final overturn to Christ the rightful heir.� Also geographically this scripture is fulfilled; the throne was overturned from Jerusalem to Ireland, from Ireland to Scotland from Scotland to Westminster Abbey. From there He whose right it is, Jesus Christ, the greater son of David, shall rule ‑ from shore to shore and from sea to sea.
The Jews were the 70 week (490 year) nation of Daniel 9:24‑27. They finished their sanctuary work, just as Judas did, and are broken as a nation forever. Jesus knew who they were [2]. They were and are the cursed fig tree nation of Matthew 21:19 and are not of de facto nation today.
They are the people who were deprived of the Kingdom [3]. That Israeli thing in Palestine is the fulfillment of Daniel 11:14 and Matthew 24:15 and not Israel's return [4]. The Jews are in Israel's land, but do not call themselves Israelite. The letters "T" and "E" are missing. Could the "T" stand for the Cross and "E" for Ephraim, the head of twelve tribed Israel, both of which they must accept before becoming true Israelites.
They were the blasphemers of Paul's day and did all they could to hinder the gospel [5]. Have they changed in their attitude toward Christ and His Gospel up to this hour? The Canaanite anti‑Christ spirit was manifest in their attitude toward Christ when they boastfully said: "We
be not born of fornication," [6].
Their statement did not refer to Christ's virgin birth, for Mary hid that secret within her heart [7]. The Shelah‑Judah Jews had access to Christ's genealogical record and referred to His descent from the supposed illegitimate Pharez branch of Judah. See how, centuries after the birth of Judah's three sons, the genealogical record of each family was kept separate [8].
In closing let us say that Christians who are giving all of Israel's promises to the Jews, that rejected nation, are doing great harm to the cause of Christ and will have to suffer the consequences. The Jews must be brought to Israel and to Israel's Christ [9], "Bring Judah to his people" (i.e. Israel). This cannot be done by proclaiming lies, they must be told the truth. "Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free."
True love shows those we love the error of their ways. many do not understand what it is to "act in true love" toward the erring brother. Few words have suffered the abuse of inaccuracy and loose meaning in recent years than was "love." With a great many true love is but a synonym for moral laxity, weakness of character, a taking the line of least resistance, a quiet tolerating of what is wrong. We have overlooked the folly of the blind and made excuses for their opposition to the Bible message for so long that we think it unkind for anyone to speak the truth.
This reluctance to speak the truth is manifest in the home life, in the churches and in national and international affairs. Leniency and weakness have overridden truth and faithfulness and this laxity is misnamed "love." Sentimentality which shrinks from "Hurting the Feelings" of other is ousting all concern for the glory of Christ and the honor of His house. God is "Light," [10], as well as "Love" [11], "Holy" as well as "Merciful," "Severe" as well as "Good" [12], and unless we want to grievously misrepresent the Divine character we must preserve a balance between the two sides.
����������������������������������������������� The One Who Wounds You The Most May Be The Best Friend You Have
While the one who is silent about your sins and refuses to rebuke you for what is dishonoring to God, is your enemy and hates you. O, for the grace to say with the Psalmist:
"Let the righteous smite me; it shall be a kindness: and let him reprove me; it shall be an excellent oil, which shall not break my head: for yet my prayer also shall be in their calamities." [13] "Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: Rebuke a Wise Man, and He Will Love Thee." [14]
How few of the wise are now left? For me to tell a sinner that all is well with him in contradiction to what God's Word teaches, wouldn't help him, but rather it would lead to his sorrow and eternal loss. Likewise, in failing to tell the Jew the truth would be doing him a great injustice.
"Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" [15]
The sons of Joseph were given the birthright [16] and Judah was never promised all of the land [17], never did Judah possess All of it [18]. Except you repent (turn from your way of thinking as well as your attitude toward Christ and His Gospel), "Ye shall all likewise perish." You will perish individually just as you perished nationally, unless you repent. Judah and Israel must walk together in the last days [19].
"In those days the house of Judah shall walk with the house of Israel and they shall come together out of the land of the north to the land that I have given for an inheritance unto your fathers." [20]; "And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble The Outcasts of Israel, and gather together The Dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim." [21]; "In those of Israel shall come, they and the children of Judah together, going and weeping: they shall go, and seek the Lord their God. They shall ask the way to Zion with their faces hitherward, saying Come, and let us join ourselves to the Lord in a perpetual covenant that shall not be forgotten. My people hath been lost sheep: Their Shepherds have caused them to go astray, they have turned them away on the mountains: they have gone from mountain to hill, they have forgotten their resting place." [22]; "Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that I will perform that good thing which I have promised Unto the House of Israel and To The House of Judah."
That good thing promised is the putting away of our sins by the blood of our Lord Jesus Christ and His return to take unto Himself the throne of His father David, "for the government shall be upon His shoulders and of the increase and peace of His government there shall be no end."
The Jews are fulfilling the prophecy of Ezekiel 11:15 in saying to Israel: "Get you far from the Lord: Unto Us Is This Land Given In Possession." Through their subtle political maneuvering they have placed, in both the Republican and Democratic platforms, a pledge to restore (?) Palestine to the Jews. To restore, means to them, to bring back to a former state. When, we ask, did the Jews ever possess ALL of Palestine? Our blind political leaders will discover, to their sorrow, that they have made a promise they can never fulfill. To all Christians supporting the Jews in their unscriptural claims and demands for Palestine we say: You Will Find Yourself Fighting Against God. Many of you wouldn't dare insist that Esau be given the birthright after he had been dispossessed.
Yet you continue to support the Jew, both morally and financially, in his futile attempts to regain something which was taken from him [23]. By doing so you prolong the suffering of the Jews and just might possibly bring the judgment of God upon your own head to your sorrow and loss, while the Jews goes to the slaughter in his vain attempts to "establish the vision." [24]
We have found Israel under the leadership of Ephraim and Manasseh, not the Jews.� We have identified Israel by their marks, by the things they are doing and the position they hold in the world. The prophecies made concerning Israel are being fulfilled by the United States and the so‑called Christian Nations of the world and not the Jews. The two sons of Joseph inherited the birthright and the name of Israel [25]. They are a great multitude in the earth, a nation and company of nations; possessing the gates of their enemies. They are God's battle‑ax and weapons of war. They are the custodians of God's Word and they Glory in Jesus Christ. They have His Name. True we do not serve Him as we should ‑ far from it, but we have not nationally, as did the Jews, denied His Name. We have found Israel the positive witness and we have found that other family, the remnant of Judah, the Shelah‑Jews, the negative witness. Remember that by the mouth of two or more witnesses shall every word be established. [26]; The people said,
"We are witnesses the Lord make the woman (Ruth) that is come into thine house like Rachel and like Leah, Which Two did build the house of Israel." [27]; "Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that I will perform that good thing which I have promised unto The House of Israel and to The House of Judah" vs. 24 "The Two families which the Lord hath chosen." [28]; "I will make a new covenant with The House of Israel and The House of Judah." [29]; "Say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold I will take the Stick of Joseph, Which is in The Hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the Stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand."
True love exhorts, rebukes, reproves and warns of dangers ahead and endeavors to win those outside of Christ
at all costs.
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ Are The Jews Israel?
The popular aversion to the subject of race has contributed much to the prevailing blindness regarding the ethnic antecedents of the Jews. "The Brotherhood of man," a One‑World, Universalist doctrine, censors any consideration of race in Bible exegesis. This is most evident throughout the organized church where any suggestion that race could be a factor in the plans and purposes of God is anathema. This has brought about a strange paradox. The plain Bible teaching that the Lord God has "A Chosen People" is denied; if not in so many words, then by silently ignoring the numerous references regarding "the children of Jacob His chosen." Virtually no credence is given to recognition of a chosen race by the main line church denominations; but, oddly enough, those who find racial distinctions the most objectionable are often the first to insist that "the Jews are God's chosen people."
Jesus exposed the age long Esau‑Idumean conspiracy to displace the seed of Jacob in order to seize Israel's inheritance. He well knew of the Idumean Herod's plot to slay Him as the Christ child, and He knew the identity of those who still sought to kill Him in order to usurp His Kingship as the legitimate Heir to the Throne of David.
When Jesus' ministry was about to end, He left the safe environments of Galilee to confront the Jews in Jerusalem. To those who believed on Him, Jesus said:
"...If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." [30]
Then His enemies raised a racial question:
"...We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?" [31]
But this was a tacit admission that, although they could claim descent from Abraham, they were not the seed of promise through Isaac and Jacob‑Israel who had been in bondage in Egypt. Jesus knew they were the descendants of Esau. When Jesus said "the scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat," He meant They had taken Control of the Government and Organized Religion. He characterized them as hypocrites:
"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him two fold more the child of hell than yourselves." [32]
Jesus identified them by their own admission:
"...If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye Serpents, Ye Generation (Race) of Vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." [33]
In His parable of the Nobleman, Jesus indicted those who would deny Him the Kingdom:
"...his citizens hated him (Christ), and sent a message after him (Christ), saying, We (Jews) will not have this man (Christ) to reign over us." [34]
To them (The Jews), He (Christ) rendered a final verdict:
"But those Mine Enemies (The Jews), which would not that I should reign over Them (Jews), bring hither, and Slay Them (Jews) before me." [35]
It should be understood that the term "Jew" in the English language Bibles is a contraction of the Hebrew word Yehu‑dim, meaning "of Judah." Failure on the part of many to recognize the true identity of the House of Israel is at the epicenter of the widespread confusion regarding Biblical distinctions between Israel, Judah and the Jews. These are not, in any sense, synonymous terms. Once these distinctions are clearly understood, one can begin to grasp the enormity of the deception on the part of "those who call themselves Jews" by assuming the mantle of Israel.
It is most unfortunate that throughout so‑called "Christian Orthodoxy," an oversimplified scenario persists that the ten "lost tribes" were assimilated by their Assyrian captors and, or absorbed among the Gentiles (Nations). According to the common belief, all that survived of the twelve tribes was the remnant of Judah which was taken captive to Babylon and eventually, they say, returned intact to Jerusalem. This grossly mistaken concept ignores many factors; particularly that the vast majority of Judahites were also taken to Assyria to follow the path of their Israelite kinsmen in the great migration westward to settle the Isles and the Northern Coastlands of Europe.
According to the Biblical accounts and secular history, the major deportations of the Northern Ten‑Tribed Kingdom of Israel were carried out by two Assyrian Monarchs, Tiglath‑pileser and Shaimaneser. About this same period, 721 B.C., another Assyrian, Sennacherib, captured the forty‑six strongholds or "fenced cities" of Judah [36].
The captives of Judah were taken in the same northerly direction where Tiglath‑pileser had taken their Israel kinsmen of the tribes of Manasseh, Reuben and Gad in 745 B.C. All of these children of Israel became part of the great migration to the appointed place, north and west of Palestine. Only "the inhabitants of Jerusalem" within the city walls escaped the Assyrian conquests.
What remained of this shattered remnant of Judah was further decimated while captive in Babylon. Little if any account is taken of the proselytes to Judaism who joined them during the captivity. After seventy years, as many as desired to go were allowed to return to Jerusalem. This number included some of the remnant of Judah and the tribe of Benjamin, and the royal descendants of David, as well as a few of the tribe of Levi.
With them came many of the proselytes who were Hittites, Canaanites and Edomites; and among these were descendants of Ishmael and Esau who pressed the claim that Abraham was their father and thrust their company upon the returning remnant. When they returned from Babylon, certain ones of the House of Judah and some of the priests intermarried with the inhabitants of the land and these intermarriages were severely condemned by Ezra and Nehemiah [37]. While there were other admixtures in Judah, these forbidden marriages were mainly with Hittites of the former Canaanite empire. In time, this merging of Judahites with Hittites became identified as one of the racial types called "Jews."
������������������������������������� Kimyarite (Himyarites) King Adopts Judaism and Converts His Army and People
Kimyarite (Himyarite) [38].
��� Sabeans: The inhabitants of the ancient kingdom of Sheba in southeastern Arabia, known from the Bible, classical writers, and native inscriptions. The genealogies of Genesis give three pedigrees for Sheba, the eponymous ancestor of the Sabeans, who is variously termed (1) the son of Raamah and the grandson of Cush [39], (2) the son of Joktan and a great‑great‑grandson of Shem [40], and (3) the son of Jokshan and a grandson of Abraham by Keturah [41].
There seem, therefore, to have been three stocks of Sabeans: one in Africa [42], and the other two in Arabia. Of the latter one is connected with the story of Abraham, and the other with that of the kingdom localized by Genesis 10:30, including the Joktanites generally, and extending "from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar, a mount of the east." In Job 6:19 the Sabeans are mentioned in close association with the Temeans, an Ishmaelite stock [43] that dwelt in Arabia [44].
The Psalms and the prophetical books lay special emphasis upon the wealth and commercial activity of the Sabeans. The gifts of the kings of Sheba and of Seba to Solomon are noted in Psalm 62:10, gold being especially mentioned among these presents [45]. In both these passages the Septuagint, followed by the Vulgate, identifies Sheba with Arabia Isaiah 60:6 adds incense to the gifts which these countries were to bring [46].
"Despite the collocation with Dedan in Genesis 10:7, 1 Chronicles 1:9 and Ezekies 38:13, the merchants of Sheba, whom Ezekiel addressed in the words 'occupied in thy fairs with chief of all spices, and with all precious stones, and gold...' [47], were doubtless Sabeans; but the reference in the following verse to the 'merchants of Sheba,' together with Haran, Canneh, Eden Asshur, and Chilmad, who by implication would be Asiatics, is probably a mere dittography, and is rightly omitted in the Septuagint. The wealth of Sheba is indicated also by the list of the gifts brought by its queen to Solomon, and which were 'a hundred and twenty talents of gold, and of spices very great store, and precious stones: there came no more such abundance of spices as these which the Queen of Sheba gave to King Solomon." [48]
The only mention of the Sabeans is a warlike connection is in Job 1:15, where they are described as attacking and killing the servants of Job to rob them of cattle; but according to Joel 4. (A.V. 3:8), they dealt in slaves, including Jews.
In the New Testament there is a reference to the kingdom of Sheba in the allusion to "the queen of the south" [49]. Sheba must be carefully distinguished from the Cushite or African Seba [50], as is shown by the discrimination between the "kings of Sheba and Seba." in Psalm 72:10, and by the collocation of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Seba in Isaiah 43:3, 45:13.
Strabo, basing his account for the most part on Eratosthenes, an author of the third century B.C., gives considerable information of value concerning the Sabeans [51]. Their territory was situated between those of the Mineans and Cattabanes; and their capital, Mariaba, stood on the summit of a wooded hill.
The country, like those adjoining, was a flourishing monarchy, with beautiful temples and palaces, and with houses which resembled those of the Egyptians. The mode of succession to the throne was peculiar in that the heir apparent was not the son of the king, but the first son born to a noble after the monarch's accession. The king himself was also the judge; but he was not allowed to leave the palace under penalty of being stoned to death by the people.
��� "Inscriptions of the Sabeans are numerous, but the information which these records furnish is comparatively meager. They cover, it is true, a period of about 1,300 years, ceasing only with the extinction of the kingdom in the sixth century C.E. (A.D.); but only of the period just before and just after the beginning of the present era are they sufficiently abundant to allow even an approximation to a coherent history. The earliest inscription known is one containing the name of Yetha‑amara, who has been identified with the 'Ithamara the Sabean' of an inscription of Sargon dated 715 B.C.
��� Besides the epigraphical remains, there is a large number of coins, dating chiefly from 150 B.C. to 150 C.E. These are of special value for the history of the nation, even during its period of decline, since they bear both the monograms and the names of numerous kings. The Sabean inscriptions are dated by eponymous magistrates previous to the introduction of an era which has been identified with the Seleucidan (312 B.C.), and which has also been fixed by other scholars as beginning in 115 B.C., although there are traces of other chronological systems as well.
��� These texts frequently allude to commerce, agriculture, and religion. The chief articles of trade are the same as those mentioned in the Bible and the classics, with the addition of horses and camels. The agricultural texts are chiefly prayers for increase in crops and live stock, with the inevitable petition of the Semite for male offspring. They contain also a number of plant‑names, as well as occasional references to systems of irrigation. The military texts, in their accounts of successful raids on and repulses of other marauding tribes, confirm the allusion in Job 1:15.
��� The references to religion are for the most part names of deities; but the entire lack of description renders a reconstruction of the Semitic pantheon practically impossible. It is clear, however, from the appellations of the gods that the religion of Sheba closely resembled the pre‑Islamic Arabian cult, and showed certain affinities with the Assyro‑Babylonian system as well. Among the Sabean gods the most important were Almakah ('the hearing god?'), Athtar (a protective deity and the male for of 'Ashtaroth,' to whom the gazel seems to have been sacred), Haubas (possibly a lunar deity), Dhu Samawi ('lord of heaven'), Hajr, Kainan, Kawim ('the sustaining'), Sin (the principal moon‑god), Shams (the chief solar deity), Yata', Ramman (the Biblical Rimmon), El ('god' in general), Sami' (the hearing'), Shem (corresponding in functions to the general Semitic Ba'al), Hobal (possibly a god of fortune), Homar (perhaps a god of wine), Bashir (bringer of good tidings), Rahman (the merciful), Ta'lab (probably a tree‑god), and Wadd (borrowed from the Mineans). A number of goddesses are mentioned, among them Dhat Hami (lady of Hami), Dhat Ba'dan (lady of Ba'dan), Dhat Gadran (lady of Gadran), and Tanuf (lofty).
��� It becomes clear, even from this scanty information, that the religion was in the main a nature‑cult, like the other Semitic religions; and this is borne out by a statement in the Koran that the Sabeans worshiped the sun. Few details of the cult are given, although there are frequent mentions of gifts and sacrifices, as well as of 'self‑presentation,' a rite of doubtful meaning, but one which evidently might be performed more than once.
��� Ritual purity and abstinence of various forms also seem to have formed part of the Sabean religion, and the name of the month Dhu Hijjat or Mahijjat, the only one retained by the Arabs (Dhu'l‑Hijja, the twelfth month), implies a custom of religious pilgrimage to some shrine or shrines.
��� To the account of the government as described by Strabo the Sabean inscriptions add little. The word for 'nation' is 'khums' (fifth), which apparently implies an earlier division of Arabia or of a portion of it into five parts; and the people were divided into tribes (shi'b), which, in their turn, were composed of 'tenths' or 'thirds.' The kings at first styled themselves 'malik' (king) and, possibly later, 'mukarrib,' a term of uncertain meaning, while they afterward were called 'kings of Saba and Dhu Raidan,' and finally monarchs of Hadramaut and Yamanet as well. There were likewise kings of a number of minor cities. From a late text which mentions a king of Himyar and Raidan and of Saba and Silhin, it has been inferred that the capital of Sheba was later removed to Raidan while the actual palace remained at Himyar, and that from this circumstance the dynasty and all that it ruled were formerly called Himyaritic (the 'Homeritae' of Ptolemy and of Christian ecclesiastical authors), a designation now generally discarded.
��� The state of society in Sheba seems to have been somewhat feudal to character. The great families, which evidently possessed large landed estates, had castles and towers that are frequently mentioned in the inscriptions; and remains of some of these buildings are still extant. The status of woman was remarkably high. The mistress of a castle is mentioned in one inscription, and the epigraphical remains represent women as enjoying practical equality with men, although a few passages imply the existence of concubinage.
��� The Sabean language belonged to the Semitic stock. While some of the inscriptions differ little from classical Arabic, most of them show a close affinity with Ethiopic. The weak letters occasionally possessed their consonant value as in Ethiopic, although they have become vowels in Arabic. On the other hand, the article is affixed as in Aramaic, instead of being prefixed as in Arabic, and certain syntactic phenomena recall Hebrew rather than the South‑Semitic dialects. The alphabet, which, like all the Semitic systems except Ethiopic, represents the consonants only, is plausibly regarded by man as the earliest form of Semitic script." [52]
Even before the captivities, the "inhabitants of Jerusalem" were already a heterogeneous composite of antagonistic groups which included the "good fig" Judahites and the "evil fig" Shelanite‑Canaanite pseudo‑Judahites the Jews. When Nebuchadnezzar carried the "good fig" Judahites with Jeconiah and the princes of Judah to Babylon [53], the "evil fig" residue of Jerusalem was left under Zedekiah who reigned in Jerusalem for eleven years as Nebuchadnessar's puppet king. The appellation, "Jew," is a relatively recent term in Old Testament history.
The word, Jew, first appears in 2 Kings 16:6, in our English language Bibles as a slang contraction of the Hebrew, Yehudim, meaning "of Judah." Or of "the land of Judah." In fact, the origin of the term, Jew, does not antedate the return of the remnant of Judah from Babylon. During the captivity, many of the Babylonians who became proselytes to Judaism adopted the name, Diaspora, or "dispersion of the Jews," but they were neither of Judahite nor Israelite ancestry. In Juda, what became known as "the nation of the Jews" consisted of the proselytes to Judaism who had swelled their numbers in Babylon. Judaism had Nothing to do with the Hebrew Religion. There were further mutations in Jewry. One occurred about 125 B.C. when the nation of the Idumeans was absorbed by the Jews. Another took place in Queen Esther's time in the Persian Kingdom when "many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them." [54]
In his "Study of Esau‑Edom in Jewry," C.F. Parker of London explains how the pseudo‑Judahites brought in additional Esau‑Edomites and Ishmaelites to help them gain control. So great was the number and influence of these interlopers that, during Jesus' ministry, He found them "sitting in Moses' seat," i.e., in complete control of the nation of the Jews, albeit subject to Rome.
By the end of the tenth century A.D., the bulk of the world's Jewish population from Mesopotamia, Persia and the Armenian and Caucasian highlands had swarmed into Khazaria and intermarried extensively with the converted Khazars to produce the Ashkenazic Jews of Eastern Europe. These Ashkenazim of Eastern Europe and the Sephardim of the Mediterranean basin have been recognized for over a thousand years as two sharply contrasted physical types within the Jewish fold. Together they comprise the major part of world Jewry. However, today, Judaism embraces many other peoples including such diverse races as the Black Jews of Malabar and Ethiopia and the Mongoloid Jews of China.
The Appellation, Jew, has been broadened to include Anyone of Whatever Race or Nationality Who Accepts the Faith of Judaism or who, without formal religious affiliation, regards the traditions of Judaism; its ethics, its folkways, its literature, as their own. The vast majority of Judah who, like their kinsmen in Israel, were taken captive by the Assyrians were Never known as "Jews" nor had they been called "Jews" while in Palestine. They were Never part of the Jewish Diaspora which came out of Babylon and Egypt.
As the historian H.G. Wells wrote:
"The main part of Jewry was Never in Judea." [55]
While the children of Israel disappeared for a time from the pages of history, The Jews have always known who they were and the World has never been allowed to lose sight of them! Because they have always sought to destroy Christians and Christianity whenever possible.
The following Jewish attacks on Christianity are taken from the February, 1978 issue of the "Christian Vanguard."
� 1). 1954: ADL attorney Leonard Schroeter, is instrumental in preparing desegregation briefs for the NAACP for hearings before the U.S. Supreme court. He said "The ADL was working throughout the South to make integration possible as quickly as possible." [56]
� 2). 1957: Jewish rabbi attacks the Lord's Prayer in the schools. [57]
� 3). 1957: American Jewish Congress brought suit to have a nativity scene of Christ removed from public school property in Ossining, N.Y. The Jews obtained an injunction and planned to take the case before the U.S. Supreme Court. [58]
� 4). 1957: New Jersey Region of the American Jewish Congress urges legislature to defeat a bill that would allow prayer in the schools. [59]
Have you ever thought about it: If the Jews God is the same one as the Christian's God, then why do they object to Prayer to God in the Schools? The answer is given in a 1960 Court case by a Jewess Lois N. Milman, If Christians would only listen and observe!
� 5). 1960: Jewish pupil objects to prayer in schools. Jewess Lois N. Milman, objected to discussing God in the Miami schools because the talk was about "A God that is not my god." (How true this is) In a court suit she also objected to "having to listen to Christmas carols in the schools." [60]
� 6). 1962: The American Jewish Congress has called the Philadelphia decision against Bible reading in the public schools a "major victory for freedom." A special three judge federal court in Philadelphia voided as unconstitutional Pennsylvania's law requiring the reading of ten verses of the Bible in public schools each day. (Remember the Jews claim that the first five books of the Bible is also their Bible. Do you begin to see what liars they are?). "The Bible was read Without Comment and objectors were Excused upon Request from parents...The Jewish Congress is a Major Force in Supporting Challenges to Traditional (Christian)Practices in the Public Schools." [61]
� 7). 1963: Jews Bernard Roseman and Bernard Copley arrested smuggling in a large quantity of LSD‑25 From Israel. The drug was manufactured at the Wiseman Institute in Israel. [62] Jews repay Christian Americans for their Hospitality and Aid by Making Drug Addicts out of their Children. [63]
� 8). 1972: The American Jewish Congress filed a formal protest with the U.S. Post Office Department about a stamp to be issued representing Christianity. (But the Jews clandestinely put a so‑called star of David on a stamp issued by the Post Office.) The P.O. Department withdrew the stamp design to please the Jews. [64]
� 9). 1972: The Jewish Committee Against Religious Encroachment in Schools filed in Federal Court to have the Yule Pageant in Westfield, N.J. banned. The suit charged, "the pageant favor belief in religion over non‑religion and favors the Christian Religion over others (Jews)." [65]
� 10). 1973: Jewish State Senator Anthony Beilenson (representing Beverly Hills) brought pressure on state officials and had the nativity scene removed from the Capitol grounds because it offended the Jews from his district. [66]
� 11). 1976: Jewish owned movie studios in Hollywood produce two anti‑Christian movies. "The Passover Plot" which portrays Christ as a revolutionary who uses drugs to trick people into thinking he was crucified. "The Sex Life of Jesus," Christ is portrayed in a series of sexual encounters including homosexual [67] "Acts The Many Faces of Jesus" is built around the same theme. (Other movies made since 1976 with that same theme, that Jesus Christ was a drug addict and Queer are "Jesus Christ Superstar," "Last Temptation of Christ," "Heaven on Earth"; this one was not about Christ but about a fallen woman angel, "Oh God‑1" and "Oh God‑2" while these did not portray Jesus as a Queer they did portray Almighty God as a stupid mortal man ‑‑ and these are only a few of the many) [68].
|
Where the hell are our so-called Christian Ministers? That's right in their pulpits, on television and radio crying out for more money and letting these antichrist perverts go on blaspheming Almighty God the the Lord Jesus Christ; While they suck up after these Satanic Creeps! |
� 12). 1977: President Jimmy Carter forced to apologize to the Jews living in America for telling his Bible class the truth, that The Jews Killed Christ. [69]
� 13). 1977: Russian Jews arriving in the U.S. given Medicaid by New York States as they claim being uncircumcised ruins their love life. They complain Jewish girls will not date them on Religious grounds if they are not circumcised (I Wonder if a Jewish boy has to show the Jewish girls his Privy Member before he asks her for a date?) Despite Constitutional separation of Church & State, New York and Federal authorities give these foreign Jews taxpayer money to be circumcised so the Jew girls will date them. [70]
� 14). 1977: Jews urge Removal of Bible Toting Judge. The Anti‑Defamation League sent a letter to the state Committee on Judicial Performance (California) to have Judge Hugh W. Godwin removed from the bench because "his Christian religious beliefs color the manner in which he dispenses justice." [71]
� 15). 1977: Lutheran Church leaders are calling for the deletion of the hymn "Reproaches" from Lutheran hymnals because the "hymn has a danger of fermenting anti‑Semitism." The ADL sent a letter commending the president of the American Lutheran Church for the action.
� 16). 1977: The American Jewish Committee was responsible for the Episcopal Church removing two hymns "Reproaches" and "Improperia" from the Book of Common Prayer because they (truthfully) accused the Jews of the Crucifixion of Christ. Rabbi Marc Tannenbaum congratulated Episcopal Bishop Allin for "his historic act of respect for Judaism and friendship for the Jewish people." (Jewish Press).
� 17). 1977: The National Jewish Commission of Law and Public Affairs is now forcing cemeteries to bury Jews on legal holidays. Cemeteries were normally closed to burials on legal holidays. However, since the Jews bury their dead quickly after death they are now forcing cemeteries to make special rules for them. Jews have been instrumental in having Christian Crosses removed from graves in Veterans Cemeteries because the crosses "offend them." [72]
� 18). 1977: U.S. Foreign Policy is now based on How Foreign Countries treat their native Jews. Senators Moynihan and Javits of New York, two ardent Zionists, notified the Soviet Government that grain shipments from the U.S. would be cancelled if the Soviets tried Jewish trouble maker Anatoly Sheharansky. (So they sent him to the Israeli State). [73]
� 19). 1977: Jewish leaders chastised Jews for celebrating Christmas and for trying to make their Hanukkah holiday like Christmas. Dr. Alice Ginott said, "(Jews) borrow the style if not the substance of Christmas and, believing they can Take The Christian Religion out of Christmas, create an artificial holiday for their children...Hanukkah symbolizes the Jewish people's struggle to maintain their spiritual (racial) identity against superior forces."
� 20). 1977: The Anti‑Defamation League has succeeded in getting 11 major U.S. firms to cancel their ads in the "Christian Yellow Pages." To advertise in the CYP, people have to declare they believe in Jesus Christ. The Jews claim they are offended by the idea of having to say they believe in Jesus Christ and yet want to force their way into the Christian Directories.
These Are Just a Few of the many attacks against Christianity by the Jews in the past several years. It is unfortunate, indeed, that the Christian clergy seems to be ignorant of, or apathetic to this plot to destroy everything they say they stand for as Christians. In fact, in many instances, they stand behind their pulpits and defend and support the very people who are pledged to destroy them.
��� There is no doubt that thousands of Christian "Ministers" are deeply disturbed by the mysterious pressures from above, which often prevent them from exercising sound judgment. One outstanding Fundamentalist pastor, a leader in the Moral Majority, recently admitted to Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr:
"I am deeply disturbed by the Jewish influence behind the efforts to destroy the Moral Majority, even though we have been strongly pro‑Jewish. But all the great Bible scholars and preachers of the Twentieth Century have said they were God's Chosen People, so I will have to go along with them."
May God have mercy on us when we use this as the Criteria for Whether we are right or wrong! The greatest spiritual teacher of all time, our Lord Jesus Christ, spoke to the Jewish religious leaders of His time in no uncertain terms:
"Ye (Jews) are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye (Jews) will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." [74]
Then Christ goes on in verse 47, speaking to the Pharisees once more:
"He that is of God heareth God's words: ye (Jews) therefore hear them not, Because ye (Jews) Are Not of God."
Does this sound like the Jews are the "Chosen People" to you? These same Jews had Alreasy admitted they were Not Israelites in verse 33, when they told Jesus:
"...We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man..."
If they had been true Israelites, they could not have said this, since any bible Scholar knows the Israelites spent over 400 years in Egypt, many of which Were in Bondage. Yet their leaders told Jesus:
"We have never been in bondage to any man."
In John 10:26‑28, Jesus spoke again to a crowd of Jewish hypocrites:
"But ye (Jews) believe not, because Ye (Jews) Are Not Of My Sheep...My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish."
Then in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 we hear the final word of our Lord concerning these pseudo‑Israelites, as He warns the church at Smyrna oncerning them. He warned them of:
"...the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
How can our preachers ("Judeo-Christian Ministers") designate these blasphemers, whom Christ has cursed as "God's Chosen People?" In fact the Jews are desperately working toward the time when:
"They shall put you (Christians) out of the synagogues: yea, The time cometh, that whosoever killeth you (Christians) will think that he doeth God service." [75]
Most of the confusion in the minds of Christians is unwarranted and unjustified. It would not exist if the so‑called Christian Clergy had not aided and abetted the deceptions responsible for it. As a matter of fact, our Christian Clergy has committed TREASON ‑‑ as defined by the Constitution of the United States.
"Treason against the United States (Or The Lord Jesus Christ), shall consist of...adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort (America and Christians send billions of dollars in military and monetary aid to the Israeli State to aid them in their murders and theft against the Palestinain people)." [76]
With so many of our clergymen allies with their enemies it is no wonder we see spiritual sabotage on every hand. It is no wonder that millions of potential "front line" soldiers for Jesus Christ have become spiritual cowards; who hide in their spiritual foxholes, praying for Christ to return and rapture them out of the mess They Are Responsible For.
Many in this category will be in for the "shock of their lives," so to speak, for they will be so tightly zipped up in their "shroud of self‑righteousness" that they will not get unzipped in time to go with their Master when He does come. Remember Jesus said:
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." [77]
The will of God goes a lot farther than knocking on doors and inviting someone to attend church; it goes farther than telling them about the love of God and the way to salvation. It means "front line duty" in the battle that rages.
To stop this spiritual surrender, we are going to have to have an "about face" on the part of our clergy. Christian organizations, such as the Moral Majority, will never reach their full potential, until their leaders will willingly and honestly point out who their enemies really are. Mr. Freedman puts his finger squarely on one of the major church problems when he told Dr. Goldstein:
"The utterances by the Christian clergy, which confuses Christians the most, is the constantly repeated utterance that 'Jesus was a Jew.' This appears to be their favorite theme. It is a Misrepresentation and Distortion of an Incontestable Historic Fact...Informed, intelligent Christians, cannot reconcile This Unwarranted Misrepresentation and Distortion of Facts."
Most competent Bible historians will admit that at no time in the New Testament is Jesus ever called a Jew and that, during His sojourn on earth, He was called a "Judean" by His contemporaries. He was also called a "Nazarene" and a "Galilean" but the Nazarenes or Galileans are Not given such a glowing account! The great Hebrew historian, Josephus, wrote many times concerning Jesus, but Never once Called Him A Jew. The church historian, Theoplylact, writing in 1080 A.D. said:
"The city of the Judeans was taken, and the wrath of God was kindled against them: as also Josephus witnesses, that this came upon them on the account of the death of Jesus."
When Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judea, allowed the crucifixion of Jesus, he had inscribed on the cross the Latin words: "Iesus Nazarenous Rex Iudeorum." He was expressing his sarcasm for the Jewish religious leaders who had pressured him into allowing them to execute a man he knew was innocent. Authorities on Latin will tell you this inscription means: "Jesus the Nazarene, ruler of the Judeans." By no stretch of the imagination does this read: "King of the Jews," And it was Not so translated in the 1611 printing of the King James Version of the Bible. During His lifetime, Christ was Never known as the "King of the Jews." Pilate knew that Jesus had been denied by the Jewish religious leaders of the people we now call Jews and that they were responsible for the false testimony they had brought against Him.
Christ was crucified, by the Jews, not because of any guilt on His part. With the exception of a few of His followers, most of the Jews abhorred His teachings. There were only 120 faithful ones in the "upper room" on the Day of Pentecost [78]. The fact that Jesus was never called a Jew, or was known by this name, cannot be erased by the "wishful thinking" of our theologians, no matter how hard they try to back the Jews.
There is no factual foundation in history or theology, which would allow the word used by Pilate to describe Jesus as a Jew. The Greek word is "Ioudais" the Latin "Iudaeus," and the English translation can be nothing but "Judean." There is no way you can come up with a religious connotation for this word. During the time of Christ, at no place in the world, was there a religion known as "Jewish."
Countless intelligent and informed Christians no longer accept unchallenged assertions by the Christian clergy that Jesus in His lifetime was a Member of a group in Judea which practiced a religious form of worship then known as "The Tradition of the Elders" and now know as "Judaism," or that Jesus in His lifetime here on earth was a Member of the racial group which today includes the preponderant majority of All The "Jews" In The World, or that the "Jews" throughout the world today are the lineal descendants of the nation in Judea of which Jesus was a national in His lifetime here on earth, or that the cultural characteristics of the "Jews" throughout the world today correspond with the cultural characteristics of Jesus during His lifetime here on earth and His teachings while He was here on earth for a brief stay.
Christians, who follow the Lord's Commandment to study to make themselves approved, will no longer believe that the race religion, nationality and culture of Jesus and the race, religion, nationality and culture of the "Jews" today or their ancestors have a common origin or character.
The resentment by Christians is more ominous than the Christian clergy suspect. Under existing conditions the Christian clergy will find ignorance is not bliss, nor wisdom folly. Christians everywhere are today beginning to learn the authentic relationship between the "Jews" throughout the world today and the "Judeans" who populated "Judea" before, during and after the time of Christ. Christians now insist that they be told correctly by the Christian clergy about the racial, religious, national and cultural background of the "Jews" throughout the world today and the basis for associating these backgrounds with the racial, religious, national and cultural background of Jesus in His lifetime in Judea. The intelligent and informed Christians are alerted to the exploded myth that the "Jews" throughout the world today are the direct descendants of the "Judeans" amongst whom Jesus lived during His lifetime here on earth.
Many Christians today are becoming more and more alerted day by day why the "Jews" throughout the world for three centuries have spent uncounted sums of money to manufacture the fiction that the "Judeans" in the time of Jesus were "Jews" rather than "Judeans," and that "Jesus was a Jew." Christians are becoming more and more aware day by day of all the economic and political advantages accruing to the "Jews" as a direct result of their success in making Christians believe that "Jesus was a Jew" in the "secondary meaning" they have created for the 18th century word "Jew." The "Jews" throughout the world today and especially those in the Mideast, represent themselves to Christians as "Jews" only in the "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew." They seek to thereby prove their kinship with Jesus. They emphasize this Fiction to Christians constantly. But that Fable is Fast Fading.
To allege that "Jesus was a Jew" in the sense that during His lifetime Jesus professed and practiced the form of religious worship known and practiced under the modern name of "Judaism" is false and fiction of the most blasphemous nature. At the time of the Crucifixion of Christ, Pontius Pilate was the administrator in Judea for the Roman Empire. At that time in history the area of the Roman Empire included a part of the Middle East. As far as he was concerned officially or personally the inhabitants of Judea were "Judeans" to Pontius Pilate and not so‑called "Jews" as they have been called since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate in History there was no religious, racial or national group in Judea known as "Jews" nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the World prior to that time.
Pontius Pilate expressed little interest as the administrator of the Roman Empire officially or personally in the wide variety of forms of religious worship then practiced in Judea. These forms of religious worship extended from phallic worship and other forms of idolatry to the emerging spiritual philosophy of an eternal, omnipotent and invisible Divine deity, the emerging Yahve (Jehovah) concept which predated Abraham of bible fame by approximately 2,000 years. As the administrator for the Roman Empire in Judea it was the official policy of Pontius Pilate never to interfere in the spiritual affairs of the local population. Pontius Pilate's primary responsibility was the collection of taxes to be forwarded home to Rome, not the forms of religious worship practiced by the Judeans from whom those taxes were collected.
The Latin word "rex" means "ruler or leader" in English. During the lifetime of Jesus in Judea the Latin word "rex" meant only that to Judeans familiar with the Latin language. The Latin word "rex" is the Latin verb "rego, regere, rexi, rectus" in English means "to rule, to lead." Latin was of course the official language in all the provinces administered by a local administrator of the Roman Empire.
This fact accounts for the inscription on the Cross in Latin. With the invasion of the British Isles by the Anglo‑Saxons, the English language substituted the Anglo‑Saxon "king" for the Latin equivalent "rex" used before the Anglo‑Saxon invasion. The adoption of "king" for "rex" at this late date in British history did not retroactively alter the meaning of the Latin "rex" to the Judeans during the time of Christ. The Latin "rex" to them then meant only "ruler, leader" as it still means in Latin. Anglo‑Saxon "king" was spelled differently when first used but at all times meant the same as "rex" in Latin, "leader" of a tribe.
During the lifetime of Jesus it was very apparent to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was the very Last Person in Judea the Pharisees or scribes would select as their "ruler" or their "leader." In spite of this situation in Judea Pontius Pilate did not hesitate to order the inscription of the Cross "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum." By the wildest stretch of the imagination it is not conceivable that this sarcasm and irony by Pontius Pilate at the time of the Crucifixion Was Not Mockery of Jesus by Pontius Pilate, But Was Mockery of the Pharisees and the scribes; whom we know today as "Jews." After this reference to "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans" the Priests, Pharisees and scribes (Jews) forthwith proceeded to Crucify Jesus upon that very Cross.
��������������������������������������������������������� It was the Chief Priests, Pharisees and Scribes (The Jews),
����������������������������������������������������������� Who Crucified our Lord Jesus Christ: Not the Romans!!!
If one is to be honest, it is Utterly Impossible to give any other English translation to "Iudaeorum" than "of the Judeans." Qualified and competent theologians and historians regard as incredible any other translation into English of "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum" than "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans."
At the time Pontius Pilate was ordering the "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum" inscribed upon the Cross the spiritual leaders of Judea (The Jews) were protesting to Pontius Pilate "not to write Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans" but to inscribe instead that Jesus "had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans." The spiritual leaders of Judea made very strong protests to Pontius Pilate against his reference to Jesus as "Rex Iudaeorum" insisting that Pontius Pilate was not familiar with or misunderstood the status of Jesus in Judea.
These protests are a matter of historical record, as you know, if you have read the account of the Crucifixion in the Bible. [79] The Gospel, by John, was written originally in the Greek language according to the best authorities. In the Greek original there is no equivalent for the English that Jesus "had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans." The English translation of the Greek original of the Gospel by John 19:19, reads "do not inscribe 'the monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios), but that He Himself said I am monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios)." "Ioudaia" is the Greek word for the Latin word "Iudea" and the English word "Judea." "Basileus" is the Greek for the Latin for "Basileus" in Greek. The English "ruler," or its alternative "leader," define the sense of Latin "rex" and Greek "basileus" as they were used in the Greek and Latin Gospel by John.
Pontius Pilate "washed his hands" of the blood of Jesus and the protests by the spiritual leaders (Jews) in Judea who demanded of him that the inscription on the Cross authored by Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate very impatiently replied to their demands "What I have written, I have written." [80] "Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum," or "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans" in English.
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Inscriptions on the Cross
Since the inscriptions on the cross has been brought up. We will try to explain the questions that the atheists and agnostics continually bring up, when tormenting baby Christians; those who have only recently accepted Christ. And in all too many occasions, older Christians who, after accepting Christ, simply sat back and never learned anything else. Each of the four Gospels gives a Different wording of these inscriptions:
� 1). Matthew 27:37: "This is Jesus, the King of the Jews."
� 2). Mark 15:26: "The King of the Jews."
� 3). Luke 23:38: "This is the King of the Jews."
� 4). John 19:19: "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews."
Here again the difficulty is created by assuming that these Similar but differing records are Identical, without noticing the exact words which are written. It is universally assumed that there was only One, and then follow the efforts to explain the alleged "discrepancies" between the different version of it.
If we note carefully what is actually said all will be clear.
� A). Mark 15:26: can be dismissed; for he does not say anything about a "title" [81] being put on the cross or anywhere else, which any one had seen. It is a question of the Lord's "accusation" or "indictment," or the ground or cause of His condemnation as claiming to be "the King of the Jews."
� B). John 19:19: speaks of a "title" written by Pilate, Before it Left Pilate's Presence; for no one suggests that Pilate went to the scene of the execution and wrote anything there. He had already "washed" his hands over the affair. In Pilate's writing the three languages were in this order: (1) Hebrew, (2) Greek, and (3) Latin (cp. D below). And it was read After the Cross had been set up. This was the one which gave rise to the argument between the Chief Priests (The Jews) and Pilate [82] and this argument took place before the parting of the garments (v. 23 and 24).
� C). Matthew 27:37: was the result of that discussion; for another "title" was brought and was "set up over his head,"After they had "Parted His Garments," and having sat down, they watched Him there (v. 35 and 36). As there could hardly have been two titles at the same time, the former must have been taken down and the other substituted. We are not told how long the argument lasted or when it ceased, or what was the final result of it.
� D). Luke 23:38: a further result is seen for another was brought much later, close upon "the sixth hour" (v. 44), when the darkness fell. It was written with the languages in a different order: (1) Greek, (2) Latin, and (3) Hebrew (v. 38 ‑‑ but read the texts completely). It was put up "over Him" (Gr ep' auto, v. 38), "After the Revilings of the People" (cp. v. 35‑37, with v. 38); whereas Matthew's (No. C) was set up Before the Revilings [83].
The result is that:
� 1). Mark's was only His indictment.
� 2). John's was the First, written by Pilate himself (or at his order, in (1) Hebrew, (2) Greek, and (3) Latin, and was put on the cross Before It Left Pilate's Presence.
� 3). Matthew's was the Second, substituted for the first, in consequence of the arguments which took place, and was set up "over His head"After the garments had been divided, and Before the revilings.
� 4). Luke's was the Third (and last), put up "over Him,"After the revilings [84], and was seen just before the darkness of the "sixth hour" (v. 44). This was written in three languages but in a different order: (1) Greek, (2) Latin, and (3) Hebrew (v. 38). Not in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin, as No. B in John 19:19.
Thus, such differences as these are marks of Divine accuracy; and, instead of being sources of difficulties, become, when rightly divided, the means of their removal.
Jesus is first referred to as a so‑called "Jew" in the 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English, and is the corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in St. Jerome's Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer any doubt.
It is an acknowledge fact the word "Jew" did not appear in the English language until 1775. Prior to that time, it did not exist in any language on earth. It was introduced into the English language in a play (The Raven) written by an English playwright named Sheridan.
It was completely unknown to Shakespeare nor was it known to the translators of the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Contrary to popular opinion, Shakespeare wrote his "Merchant of Venice," (V. III i. 61). "I am an Iewe: hath not an Iewe eyes."
To go back a bit further, the word "Jew" does not appear in the 1582 version of the Douay Bible, the official translation of the Roman Catholic Church. But it does appear in both that version and the King James Version, when they were revised late in the 18th Century.
As we have stated, the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century and its one and only implication, inference and innuendo at that time was "Judean." However, during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries a well‑organized and well‑financed international "pressure group" (which later became known as Zionism) has created a so‑called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English‑speaking people of the world.
This so‑called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word "Jew." It is a misrepresentation. It is a Deliberate Lie Formulated by the Jews to Deceive Christians into support for a people who are the Enemies of Christ! The "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew" today bears as little relation to its original and correct meaning as the "secondary meaning" today for the word "camel" bears to the original and correct meaning of the world "camel," or the "secondary meaning" today for the word "ivory" bears to the original and correct meaning of the word "Ivory." Therefore, the "secondary meaning" today for the word "camel" is a cigarette by that name but its original and correct meaning is a desert animal by that name. While the "secondary meaning" of the word "ivory" today is a piece or box of soap whereas its original and correct meaning, the tusk of a male elephant.
The "secondary meanings" of words often become the Generally Accepted meanings of words formerly having entirely different meanings. This is accomplished by the expenditure of great amounts of money for well‑planned publicity. So today if you ask for a "camel" someone will hand you a cigarette by that name. Today if you ask for a piece of "ivory" someone will hand you a piece or a box of soap by that name. You will never receive either a desert animal or a piece of the tusk of a male elephant; unless you specifically state that is what you want.
We believe this illustrates the extent to which "secondary meanings" are able to practically eclipse the original and correct meanings of words in the minds of the general public.
The "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" today has totally eclipsed the original and correct meaning of the word Jew when it was introduced as a word to the English language. Well‑planned and well‑financed world‑wide publicity through every available means and by every available media by well‑organized "Jews" for three centuries has created a "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" which has completely "blacked out" the original and correct meaning of the word Jew. There can be no doubt about that! There is not a person in the entire English‑speaking world today who regards a "Jew" as a "Judean" in the literal sense of the word. But that was the correct and Only meaning in the 18th century. The generally accepted "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew" today is Falsely Presented by the Clerty with practically no exceptions is made of four universally‑believed theories.
These four theories are that a "Jew" is,
� (1) A person who today professes the form of religious worship known as "Judaism," and that it is the foundation of Christianity.
�� (2) A person who claims to belong to a racial group associated with the ancient Semites.
� (3) A person directly the descendant of ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history.
� (4) A person blessed by Divine intentional design with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to other.
The present generally accepted "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew" is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of the countless Christians for their Christian faith.
The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word "Jew" today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian Clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song "Jesus was a Jew." Until it actually now approaches a psychosis.
Thousands of Christians have come to the knowledge that they were "Brainwashed" by the so‑called Christian Clergy on the subject "Jesus was a Jew." The resentment they feel is not yet apparent to the Christian Clergy. Christians will soon begin to demand from the Christian Clergy "The Truth, The Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth." Because they know it is time for the Christian Clergy to tell Christians what they should have told them long ago.
Remarking about what took place in 1776, some Rhode Island Jews were overheard to say, in regards to the White American peoples' attitude about Jesus Christ, as their King:
"Damn those fellows! We shall never be able to do anything with them, until we root out that cursed Puritanic spirit!" [85]
This was in response to such statements as the one made by governor, Jonathan Trumbull of Connecticut, who spoke out openly in defense of freedom:
"It is hard to break connections with our mother country, but when she strives to enslave us, the strictest union must be dissolved...'The Lord reigneth; let the earth rejoice; let the multitudes of isles be glad thereof,' the accomplishment of such noble prophecies is at hand."
And to a letter to the Board of Trade in England: "If you ask an American, who is master? He will tell you he has none, nor any governor but Jesus Christ." Which may have given rise to the cry which was soon passed up and down the length of America by the Committees of Correspondence: "No king but King Jesus!"
|
The Jews are the most Deadly Enemy they have ever faced; The Jews are responsible for the outright murder of uncounted millions of Christians over the past 2,000 years; The Jews are even now working day and night to destroy this Great Christian Nation: The United States of America! It was the International Jewish Bankers who instigated the American Civil War! |
In respect to the Civil War, we will begin with several quotes from a book written in the last century.
��� "It was to obey those bloody laws that Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nates, caused the death of half a million of men, women, and children, who perished in all the highways of France, and caused twice that number to die in the land of exile, where they had found a refuge. Those anti‑social laws, today, are written on her banners with the blood of ten millions of martyrs. It is under those bloody banners that 6,000 Roman Catholic priests, Jesuits and bishops, in the United States, are marching to the conquest of this republic, backed by their seven millions of blind and obedient slaves.
��� Those laws, which are still the ruling laws of Rome, were the main cause of the last rebellion of the Southern States. Yes! Without Romanism, the last awful Civil War would have been impossible. Jeff Davis would never have dared to attack the North, had he not had assurance from the Pope, that the Jesuits, the bishops, the priests and the whole people of the Church of Rome, under the name and mask of democracy, would help him. These diabolical and anti‑social laws of Rome caused a Roman Catholic (Beauregard a Jew) to be the man chosen to fire the first gun at Fort Sumter, against the flag of Liberty, on the 12th of April, 1861. Those anti‑Christian and anti‑social laws caused the Pope of Rome to be the only crowned prince in the whole world, so depraved as to publicly shake hands with Jeff Davis, and proclaim him president of a legitimate government.
��� These are the laws which led the assassins of Abraham Lincoln to the house of a rabid Roman Catholic woman, Mary Surratt (a Jewess), which was not only the rendezvous of the priests of Washington, but the very dwelling‑house of some of them. Those bloody and infernal laws of Rome nerved the arm of the Roman Catholic, Booth (a Jew), when he slaughtered one of the ignoble man in the history of America to that time. Those bloody and anti‑social laws of Rome, after having covered Europe with ruins, tears, and blood for ten centuries, have crossed the oceans to continue their work of slavery and desolation, blood and tears, ignorance and demoralization, on this continent. Under the mask and name of democracy (which is in all reality Judaism) they have raised the standard of rebellion of the South against the North, and caused more than half a million of the most heroic sons of America to fall on the fields of carnage.
��� In the very near future, if God does not miraculously prevent it, those laws of dark deeds and blood will cause the prosperity, the rights, the education, and the liberties of this too confident nation to be buried under the mountain of smoking and bloody ruins. On the top of that mountain, Rome (Judaism through the rule of the Black Pope) will raise her throne and plant her victorious banners." [86]
Lincoln [87] was quoted to have said:
��� "We owe it to the Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noble sons. Though there were differences of opinion between the South and the North, on the question of slavery, neither Jeff Davis nor anyone of the leading men of the Confederacy would have dared to attack the North, had they not relied on the Promises of the Jesuits (the Jews), that...
��� The Money and the Arms of the Roman Catholic Church, and even the arms of France were at their disposal, if they would attack us (See how long the Dragon; Satan's Children have been working to enslave the entire world and destroy the memory of Christ and Christianity from off the face of the earth, and if possible at the same time to destroy True Israel the Anglo‑Saxons, Germanic, Celtic and Kindred People). I pity the Priests, the Bishops and the Monks of Rome in the United States, when the people realize that they are in Great Part Responsible for the Tears and Blood Shed in this war.
��� I conceal what I know, for if the people knew the whole truth, this war would turn into a religious war, and at once, take a tenfold more savage and bloody character. It would become merciless as all religious wars are. It would become a war of extermination on both sides. The Protestants of both the North and South would surely unite to exterminate the Priests and Jesuits, if they could hear what Professor Morse has said to me of the plots made in the very city of Rome to destroy this Republic, and if they could learn how the Priests, the Nuns, and the Monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretext of preaching their religion, instructing the people in their schools, taking care of the sick in the hospitals, are nothing but the emissaries of the Pope, of Napoleon and the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions, alienate the hearts of our people from our Constitution and our laws, destroy our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they have done in Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain and wherever there are any people who want to be free...
��� New projects of assassination are detected almost every day, accompanied with such savage circumstances that they bring to my memory the massacre of St. Bartholomew and the Gunpowder Plot. Our investigation indicates that they come from the same masters in the art of murder, the Jesuits. The New York riots were evidently a Romish plot from beginning to end. We have the proofs in hand that they were the work of Bishop Hughes and his emissaries. No doubt can remain about the bloody attempts of Rome to destroy New York, when we know the easy way it was stopped. I wrote to Bishop Hughes, telling him that the whole country would hold him responsible for it if he would not stop it at once. He then gathered the rioters around his palace, called them his 'dear friends,' invited them to go back home peacefully, and all was finished!...From the beginning of our civil war, there has been, not a secret, but a public alliance, between the Pope of Rome and Jeff Davis. The pope and his Jesuits have advised, supported, and directed Jeff Davis (through Judah P. Benjamin, also a Jew) on the land, from the first gun shot at Fort Sumter by the Rabid Roman Catholic Beauregard (Jew). They are helping him on the sea by guiding and supporting the rabid Roman Catholic pirate, Semmes, on the ocean...
��� The pope has thrown away the mask, and shown himself the public partisan and the protector of the rebellion, by taking Jeff Davis by the hand, and impudently recognizing the Southern States as a legitimate government. Now, I have the proof in hand that that very Bishop Hughes, whom I had sent to Rome...is the very man who advised the pope to recognize the legitimacy of the Southern republic, and put the whole weight of his tiara in the balance against us in favor of our enemies! Such is the perfidity of those Jesuits (Jews)." [88]
Under the guiding hand of Judah P. Benjamin (a Jew), chosen by the Rothschilds and the Church of Rome to represent the International Bankers, to do their work for them in the United States, was also the first advisor to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin is reputed to be the "brains of the revolt," as he was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy. Through the hands of this man, huge sums of money were provided to finance the destruction of this great New Christian American Republic flowed. The Confederacy fell and the men who had fought a valiant fight for what they believed right were thrown into the even greater travail of the Reconstruction; while Judah P. Benjamin, almost alone of the leaders of the South, forsook immediately the suffering people Who had Honored and Enriched Him, fled to England and was soon embarked upon a new career of distinction and wealth, Reminiscent of others of his religion (Jewish) dispossessed of their temporary cause and gains.
While we are talking of the Civil War it behooves us to mention that Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (A Jew). That the plot of Booth, involved not only the assassination of Lincoln, which was accomplished, but also the assassination on the same night of the Vice President, Andrew Johnson, of the Secretary of State, William H. Seward, and of General Ulysses S. Grant. Seward, who was ill at his home, was stabbed, as was also his son, Frederick Seward, by David E. Herold (A Jew), a co‑conspirator with Booth, who was hanged. The Vice President Johnson escaped injury, but George A. Atzerodt (also a Jew) was hanged for conspiring with Booth to kill him. General Grant, who was to have attended the theater with Lincoln that night, due to an unexpected departure for Burlington, New Jersey, was unharmed.
"John Booth, A Jewish silversmith whose ancestors had been exiled from Portugal because of their radical political views. In London the refugees had continued their trade and free thinking, and John had married Wilkes' cousin. This Wilkes was the 'celebrated agitator John Wilkes of Westminster, London...John Wilkes Booth's father was Junius Brutus Booth." [89]
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ American Civil War and Captivity
History often repeats itself, and like the ancient nation of Israel, America has been/is Undergoing a type of Captivity; the start of which as the Civil War of 1861. Not a physical conquest and captivity by foreign armies, but by stealthy encroachments against its founding legal principles, superseding them with new laws. Yet this is still a conflict. It is a conflict that seeks to conquer America and its people just as sure and complete as any physical captivity could have achieved.
Like Ancient Israel, America's adversaries and captors were foreign aliens, however, they did not attack America from outside its boarders but from within them. This enemy was none other than an elite group of alien Jewish money powers who had gained financial control over Europe and now wished to likewise financially conquer America. Through the use of large banks, usury, loans, and commodity manipulation, the Jews were able to control the political arena in Europe. Their conspiratorial plan for America was to repeat this modus operandi through which they could form a "new order" of law and government.
Perhaps the greatest and most tragic disaster in the history of the United States was the Civil War, or, the War Between the States, the South calls it The War of Aggression. The whole country is still paying for that evil Satanic war [90]. It is still difficult to speak or write about it without angering someone, blacks, Northerners, or Southerners.
Many people have been reluctant to argue over that unpleasant subject but unwilling to be silent when there was a need to speak, have told Northerners that it was less a moral concern and more economic and sectional hatred that governed the North. The rhetoric of a sizeable minority, mostly Jews, the Abolitionists, was anti-Christian and Unitarian. They were intensely interested in destroying the South, and their moral claims were questionable.
The Southerners were also ready to allow, as did the Northerners, the extremists and hotheads to lead the way into an unrealiztic war. The war came when the churches were at a low ebb theologically, although the South saw a major revival among the troops during the war. While the South was stauchly Christian, its leaders, especially secessionists, who were also mostly Jews, were not.
Some significant facts must be remembered about the South. Savage called attention to a neglected fact: "Of the hundred and thirty anti-slavery societies organized in the country, more than two thirds were in the South." [91] There were good reasons for this. First, slavery was a very present fact to all Southerners. Second, Puritan faith had then centered in the South and deeply resented by Unitarians, strongly influenced many Southerners, although not very many of their politicians. Third, only one of sixteen Southerners owned eve a single slave. [92] There were various reasons for this. Some of the fifteen Southerners could not afford it. Others were against slavery. Other than South Carolina, Southern states favored abolition provided that the slaves could be repatriated somewhere, and, with some, their owners compensated. Fourth, many Southerners resented the power and pride of the slave-owning aristocracy.
Even then, secession was not popular when first propounded by John C. Calhoun. Calhoun was a Northerner by education, a Yale man whose goal was to have Yale educate his sons. [93] Calhoun himself was at Yale in Timothy Dwight's day, whose faith Calhoun rejected. Calhoun would not join the church, nor profess Christianity, nor even join the Moral Society. In the classroom, his disavowal of Christianity was open. [94] When in politics, in Washington, D.C., he gave money to help build the Unitarian Church, and his name is found among the original members. Although he attended his wife's Episopal Church when in the South, he bluntly announced on one occasion, "Unitarianism is the only true faith and will ultimately prevail over the world." [95] In his last days, with an echo of his childhood Calvinism, Calhoun spoke of his "unshaken reliance upon the province of God," [96] but not of Jesus Christ.
Calhoun's perspective was important. More than a few prominent Southerners sought their education in New England colleges which were openly or tacitly Unitarian. The Timothy Dwights of the early years could not stem the tide. Unitarian and Transcendentalist thinking was either Hegelian or shared common roots with Hegel. Such thinking represented a major intellectual revolution in Europe with deep roots in the Enlightenment. Hegel best expressed the think of his and the previous era, namely, a radical belief in the conflict of interestts. With the French Revolution, the Western world entered into the Age of Revolution, which is very much with us still. As against the Biblical Faith in an ultimate harmy of interests for the Godly [97], this new belief was in a radical conflict of interests. Thus, the way to progress was revolutionary violence to establish justice, and hostile confrontations to resolve problems. Not moral suasion but bitter conflict was seen as the ethical course of action.
This faith marked the Abolitionists in the North, most of whom were Unitarian. In the South, Unitarianism was not an organized ecclesiastical or intellectual cause as much as the tact premise of the secessionist leaders. Calvinist leaders in that cause were at the best rare. However, Enlightenment premises were popular among gentlemen, and these persons were receptive to the Unitarian developments there of. The secessionist leaders were not Calvinists, and they did share in the growing and tacit Unitarian8ism of the leaders of the day.
Those men, North and South, who were not Christian, were not thereby neutral but rather were deeply influenced by a common media that prevailed in all of the United States. That media represented the culture of Enlightenment humanism. The philosophy of the modern era began with Descartes, whose "cognito, ergo sum," I think, therefore I am, was the starting point of philosophical inquiry. The Carthesian premise at once created a division in man's perspective between body and soul, between perceptions and reality, and between the inner and the outer worlds so that the concern was to bridge two realms. With Kant, the real world became the realm of the mind, and the reality was what the philosophical [98] mind declared it to be. Thus, the real world was not the creation of God but the creation of the philosopher's mind. it followed, then, that the rational is the real.
But what if some refuse to recognize that reality is what they define as real? What if, as with the Abolitionists, the reality is human freedom for all? Or if adherents of slavery see it as a condition inherent to slavery? What happens then? Without God and His law, man's recourse is to himself, or to his creature, the state. Reality is then not God, nor His created order and His law; it is instead what man declared is right the new reality is man's declared law, and the non-Christians in both North and South had their own vision of the right and the real. God was not in their picture. To read through the editionh of John C. Calhoun's works, in the Cralle edition of 1851-1856, or the more recent and more extensive collection edited by W. Edwin Hemphill, is a chilling experience: there is no evidence of Christian thinking. In the North, the abolitionists wanted conflict, not resolution. Slavery could have been abolished had the North been ready to take practical steps, such as compensating the slave-owners and some kind of plan for the future of the slaves. The Abolitionists, however, wanted conflict, as did the secessionists by 1860. Lincoln, without war, would have been a stalemated President, with a hostile Congress in power. The demand in the radical circles both North and South was for conflict as the solution. Otto Scott has pointed out that, that at about the same time, many courntires with a higher perfentage of slaves freed them all peaceably; only the United States had a war over the matter. In the U.S., more than anywhere else, the common man was reasonably well informed and atune to intellectual trends. In a travel essay written for a French magazine on his return fromt he U.S., Alexis de Tocqueville wrote, of frontier Michigan:
"When you leave the man roads you force your way down barely trodden paths. Finally, you see a field cleared, a cabin made from half-shaped tree trunks admitting the light through one narrow window only. You think that you have at last reached the home of the American peasant. Mistake. You make your way into this cabin that seems th asylum of all wretchedness but the owner of the place is dressed in the same clothes as yours and he speaks the language of towns. On his rough table are books and newspapers, he himself is anxious to know exactly what is happening in old Europe and asks you to tell him what has most struck you in his country. One might think one was meeting a rich landowner who had come to spend just a few nights in a hunting lodge."
This was in 1831. One can say that Toqueville found a superior settler without invalidating his point that the Americans in the most remote areas were not peasants but citizens of the Western world. This made them more readily susceptible to currents of thought than were rural peoples in Europe. There was another factor. The American War of Independence had been a legal break. The colonies were not under Parliament but the crown. They were chartered colonies. Under law, the agents of the crown, held by the ailing George III, were violating the charters and placing the colonies under Parliament. King George III was King of England, King of Scotland, King of New York, King of Massachusetts, and so on, all separate realms. Their powers were subverted, and the colonies were subjected to an armed invasion by Parliament
This same scenerio is happening today, and has been happening for the last few decades. America was under the Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, but is being invaded by the President, Congress and the Courts. Therefore, when the coming conflict, and there will be a conflict because evil men who control the Congress, President and Courts from behind the scenes wish such a conflict. But, praise Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ, this time they will be utterly destroyed, for Christ will come and rescue His Israel People from their evil grasp.
In 1863, a monthly journal, "The Old Guard" began publication in New York, dedicated to the defense in effect of secession. "The Old Guard" cited publicaitons of the 1776 era as justifications for 1860 and secession, and tellingly so. At the same time, however, a subtle shift had taken place. The War of Independence had become known as the American Revolution. Jacobinism flourished in the United States with the French Revolution, especially in Democratic circles. A legally faithful course of severance became confused wiht revolution. Aledxander H. Stephens, the Confederate vice-president, in his great "Constitutional View of the Late War Between the States," defined the legalities of the war. But it was not Stephens who precipitated the war but men like Edmund Ruffin, known as a firebrand.
The roots of that war are with us still. North, South, East and West, the belief in the conflict of interests is very great, and it still predisposes Americans to senseless divisions. The conflict of interests concept is born of a world view which is implicitly evolutionary, posits the struggle for survival, and sees that struggle as inherent to life, i.e., as metaphysical rather than moral, although the strubble can borrow moral coloration. The Calvinistic insistance on the moral antithesis seeks its resolution in conversion, in a new creation. The conflict of interestbelief seeks its "resolution" in the obliteration of the opponent. It has led to the doctrine of Total War in the military sphere and elsewhere. Not surprisingly, the modern military strategy of Total War began in the so-called Civil War with men like Quantrill in the South (a guerilla), and General Sherman in the North. Its history is a grim one.
One of the most startling spectacles of the, supposed, collapse of Soviet Communism was surely the Confederate battle flags which occasionally waved above the mass rallies of the Baltic peoples, as they demonstrated to press their claims of sovereignty. Not surprisingly, the pictures of those flags did not make it into the politically correct American newspapers. Still, their presence suggests that we may need to rethink our own view of America's secessionist history in light of the current popularity of post-communist secessionist movements.
For too many, secessionism is an argument of convenience, wherein we take sides based on whether we like or dislike the seceding arty. Irish-Americans were almost deliriously suportive of the Irish Republic's secession from the United Kingdom. The Northern six counties remained loyal to Britain, based on ties of culture and relition. Interestingly, the Ulster Unionists have made folk heroes of such American Unionists as General (and later President) Ulysses S. Grant. Indeed, his biography is still sold by the ruling Ulster Unionist Party.
As Britain prepares to abandon Northern Ireland, it shall be interesting to see if the Ulstermen shall remain so deeply committed to unionism, or suddenly find confederation, or even independence, as preferable to submersion into the Roman Catholic Republic to the south. If secessionism and unionism are, in fact, mere posturing the problem, then becomes one of identifying and formulating a principled basis for government itself, as it relates toplace and culture, rather than expediency.
For the Christian, one obviously srarts with two basic Scriptural facts: 1). God divided the peoples of the earth at Babel, and 2). He established the bounds of the nations. The question is how properly to apply these foundational principles to the question of nationhood today. Furthermore, it is important that our view of secession and nationhood bee applicable to every circumstance, from the United States to the former Yugoslavia to the Hutu and Tutsi tribal wars of Africa.
��� Diversity and Confederation: For the Founders of the American Republic, the answer was obviously covenantal and constitutional. The notion that the American colonies were homogeneous is pure fiction. The colonies were certainly as distinct, at least regionally, as any parts of the United States are today. The Dutch influence in New York contrasted with the Quaker and German influence in Pennsylvania, the cavalier culture of Virginia, Puritan domination of Massachusetts, Huguenot immigration in the Carolinas, Spanish influence in Florida, Roman Catholic in Maryland, etc.
The British had only recently established their dominance of the colonies by defeating the French during the French and India War (aka Seven Years War). It was the subsequent battle against Britain that temporarily allied the colonies with one another and laid the foundation for post-war confederation. The first attempt, codified in the Articles of Confederation, proved to have several flaws (at least to those who fovored a stong central government) and was subsequently replaced with the current Constitution.
Over the next century, the South would flourish agriculturally, while manufacturing and commece grew rapidly in the North. This was not merely a feature of topography� climate and opportunity, but also an outworking of cultural predispositions. In his book, Cracker Culture, Grady McWhiney argues persuasively that the South was (or became through immigration) culturally Celtic, while the North remained culturally British and German. His study of surnames showed that by a substantial margin, Southern soldiers were of Celtic descent. A substantial majority of Northern soldiers, on the other hand, bore British surnames. [99] The reason Southerners were able to maintain a relative degree of unity with their Northern counterparts was due, in no small measure, to the fact that the zealous Roman Catholicism which characterizes modern-day Ireland is of relatively recent vintage. McWhiney points out that the Irish immigrants to the Old South were decidely not strong Roman Catholics and were quickly assimilated into the various branches of Protestantism then extant.
That the states were able to confederate after the first War for Independence is testimony to the great men with whom God providentially chose to bless the respective colony-states. Modern history texts virtually dismiss these men's labors on behalf of confederation, along with confederation itself. The popular notion is that confederation was rejected and national unionism adopted, almost without debate. Only those completely unfamiliar with the history of the period could adopt such Northern revisionism with a straight face. The debate was intelligent and intense, on both sides. In the end, we adopted a federal system, not a national one.
We must make the point, if not belabor it, that the debate over the Constitution was expressly ab out the nature of the proposed union and that states expressly articulated their understanding as to the dissoluble nature of the federal union, should that union exceed the bounds of its express powers. In raction to the "Alien and Sedition Acts," the Virginia House of Delegates and Senate adopted the resolution put forward by James Madison, stating:
"That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the Federal Government, as resulting from the compact to which the States are parties, as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting that compact, as no further valid than they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted, by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right, and are duty bound, to interpose, for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining, within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties, appertaining to them." [100]
This resolution, first passed in 1798, was re-examined in the following Session and declared "(that) in its just and fair construction, it is unexceptionally true in its several positions, as well as constitutional and conclusive in its evidences." The sustaining resolution continues:
"Clear as the position must seem, that the Federal powers are derived from the Constitution, and from that alone, the committee are not unapprized of a late doctrine, which opens another source of Federal powers, not less extensive and important, than it is new and unexpected."
The Virginia Resolution then meticulously dissects the "new and unexpected" doctrine, reminding the Congress and other States how firmly proponents of the new Constitution had argued that powers not expressly delegated to the Federal government were reserved to the States, or to the People. [101] The battle was clearly joined, as the pragmatists incessantly sought to expand national power, dismissing the arguments of principle and constitutionalism.
��� "Intangible Moonshine": In Dabney's day, such arguments as those presented by the constitutionalists were dismissed, in his words, as the "intangible moonshie of metaphysical [102] ideas." [103] He chronicles the changes wrought by the "new and unexpected doctrines" so cogently identified by Madison. From our perspective today, we can see that the flight from constitutionalism mirrored the ascendance of Unitarianism, itself a driving force behind the eventual War Between the States.
There were prominent Unitarians on both sides of the conflict. John Calhoun, as well as Edmund Ruffin, who put fire to the first cannon at Ft. Sumter, were thoroughgoing Unitarians. It was in the North, however, that Unitarians had their most pernicious influence, holding the Union army to be the very Incarnation itself. In her Battle Hymn of the Republic, Julia Ward Howe writes, incredibly, "I have seen Him in the watchfires of a hundred circling camps/They have built to Him an altar in the evening dews and damps."
While the writings of the Founding Fathers are replete with pleas for Divine protection and Providential favor, nowhere does one find a voice so presumptuous as to claim Divine attributes for the acts of mere men. This equating of Christ's mediatorial rule with earthly armies was heresy, pure and simple. It is the stuff of Crusade, Inquisition and jihad and has no place in Protestant theology or practice. God may, indeed, send Pharaoh to chastise His people, but having acknowledged His sovereignty at work, we err if we give Pharaoh any credit. In like manner, Southerners may receive God's chastisement in defeat, but it is a presumptuous Northerner indeed who would expect God's blessing for the destruction he visited on his neighbor.
For those who insist on arguing from circumstance (rather than from the "intangible moonshie of metaphysical ideas"), let us consider who has received God's blessing, in fact? In the camp, tens of thousands of Southerners were converted by the Holy Spirit and returned home to raise Christian families. The marks of that tremendous revival are still evident in the distinctively Christian culture of the American South today. Would any Christian Southerner trade that spiritual victory for victory on the field of battle? Precious few, one would think.
But what of the victors? After trampling the vineyeards of wrath, did the Northern armies cease to be the Incarnate Christ, or did the messianic state simply replace by force of statute what had been won by force of arms? How do we explain the death of constitutionalism, the rise of statute law, ever-expanding centralized federal power and the other fruits of the Northern victory? Are these a falling away from, or the natural consequence of, presumption and self-will? Is it so far a journey from trampling the vineyards of wrath to "making the world safe for democracy?"
George Washington warned against "entangling foreign alliances," but Woodrow Wilson plunged us headlong into a European War, presuming as did the liberals of a previous generation that government had a transcendent right to act as Mediator of Creation. In the League of Nations [104], this liberal post-millenialism would assume Christ's role as Mediator of Redemption, as well. The God who "established the boundaries of the nations" would stay His hand of judgment for only a season before this modern tower of Babel came crashing down, as well. Undeterred, the enemies of Christianity would try again with the formation of the United Nations. From Lincoln's blue uniforms to Clinton's blue helmets, the tragedy of messianic interventionism travels a road strewn with the liberties, property and human wreckage of an idea gone terribly wrong.
��� Heresy Today, Best-Seller Tomorrow: Is it not remarkable how easily Evangelicalism seems to adopt every stray-dog doctrine and movement for its own? If we object to the "baptized humanism" which lines the shelves of the typical Christian bookstore today, ought we not to seek out as rigorously what other historical and philosophical camels we may have swallowed before breakfast? What a comfort it must be to the Jewish charlatans and bamboolzers of every description to note how sanitized is our mondern view of Abraham Lincoln, for example, a man who sought out Christians just to aruge against Scriptural inerrancy and trinitarianism. At least four contemporary historians of his day relate that a friend named "Hill" burned a manuscript written by Lincoln in order to save "Honest Abe's" political career from ruin. The manuscript was an attempt to disprove the divinity of Christ. Though asked about it, Lincoln never denied or disclaimed the book [105] Of course, we may substitute a pious sentimentalism and latter-day revisionism for the truth, but to what end?
Let's get to the root of the matter. Many Christians want it to be simple: Lincoln good, slavery bad. But as in most controversies, it is not that simple. To suggest that any means were lawful to extinguish an unbiblical system of slavery in the South is a dangerous reductionism. That was the ethical foundation on which abolitionist John Brown stacked the corpses of his neighbors, murdered in their sleep in Lawrence, Kansas. It is not dissimilar to the blanket absolution some abortion abolitionists expect for their own acts of murder and mayhem, today. Both are lawless and, therefore, both are ungodly. We need not defend Kansas slave owners or murderous abortionists to condemn acts which break the civil covenant. Indeed, even magistrates may step beyond the pale of God's protection if their acts are unlawful. Such was the case when Northern leaders took to themselves powers which the Constitution never gave them.
There were many in the North who abhorred slavery, but believed that it was a state issue beyond the reach of federal law. It is ludicrous, however, to suggest that hundreds of thousands of Southerners who did not own slaves would take up arms merely to defend an institution in which they had no interest. The motivating cause was, in most cases, a defense of home and family. As one Southern soldier was heard to respond when asked across the trenchline why he, a poor sharecropper, was fighting, "Because y'all are down here." For many, it was as simple as that.
��� The Call of Duty: For Southern Christians, there was a variety of opinion. Many were constitutionalists who were scandalized by Northern assaulst on state's rights. A great many, like Southern Presbyterian theologian Robert L. Babney and fellow Presbyterian Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson [106], believed that war would be a great evil. Both were signers of newspaper ads which ran in Virgnia papers urging peace and reconciliation and opposing calls for secession and war. Still, when war broke out, they took up arms in defense of their homeland. Their position was totally consistent with their covenantal and constitutional view and one most Christians today would do well to study.
Deeper South, South Carolina Presbyterian theologian James Thornwell was an advocate of secession. Robert E. Lee and his family were devout Christians who pleaded for reconciliation rather than war. Lee himself was offered command of the Union armies, but recognized that his constitutional and convental duty lay with his home state of Virginia. After a several-hour meeting across the Potomac in Washington, D.C., with his former commander and old friend, General Winifred Scott, Lee resigned his commission in the army and subsequently heeded the call of Virginia. [107] His Christian testimony was never questioned by friend or foe alike.
��� The Good Civilization of the South: To what purpose do we so easily despise the shed blood of a generation, whose lives were laid down for a cause we claim to hold dear? Shall we eat the fruits of liberty while laying the ax to the tree which brought it forth? This is nothing more than presumption, pride and ingratitude. Far from disclaiming our rich heritage, or shunning it in embarrassed silence, true Southerners realize that the Old South passed from the scene not because it was good enough, but rather because it was too good.
We do not speak of the sanctificaito of a people, for indeed, that is as much a fruit of the conflict as a precondition. Rather, we speak of a new order that arose, a new Pharoah who "knew not Joseph." The citizens forgot their roots. The price of liberty, described by Jefferson as "eternal vigilance" simply was left unpaid by a generation preoccupied with commerce and urbanization.
Dabney eloquently notes that;
��� "...while we were contending for the rights and interests of the civilizaed world, nearly the whole world blindly and passionately arrayed against us...We were attempting to defend and preserve a system of free government which had become impossible by reason of the change and degeneration of the age. To the outside world they were to be one, to each other they were still to be equals and independent partners...The functions of the general government were to be few and defined, its expenditures modest, and its burdens in time of peace light. Such was the form of government instituted for themselves by our free forefathers; and well fitted to their genius and circumstances as communities of farmers inhabiting their own homes, approaching an equality of condition, and having upon the whole continent no one city of controlling magnitude or wealth.
��� But this century has seen all this reversed because of Jewish subversion; and conditions of human society have grown up, which make the system of our free forefathes obviously impracticable in the future. And this is so, not because the old forms were not good enough for this day, but because they were too good for it." [108]
Lest we think Dabney spoke only of a romanticized antebellum agrarianism, he adds that,
"Our fathers valued liberty, but the liberty for which they contended was each person's privilege to do those things and those things only to which God's law and Providnece gave him a moral right. The liberty of nature which your modern asserts as absolute license is the privilege of doing whatever a corrupt will craves, except as this license is curbed by a voluntary 'social contract.'" [109]
��� The Religion of the South: Make no mistake, the Jews hate Christ and Christianity with a passion that know no bounds. Therefore, they hated the South because of its adherence to Christianity and sought its total destruction. [110] To have any understanding the the pre-War South, one must first note its religion. Henry Van Til has correctly noted, "religion and culture are inseparable. Every culture is animated by religion." [111] The South was greatly influenced by the Second Great Awakening that impacted America in the 1800s (which was very dangerous for the Jews, so they had to put a stop to it before it could reach such a crescendo that no power could subdue it). Numerous denominations were affected. Unlike in the South, where the Second Great Awakening contributed to a near abandonment of Calvinist theology [112], in the North, Calvinism gained in influence. Prior to this spiritual revival, Presbyterians had churches and schools to meet their goal of training the covenant youth. However, with the God-sent revival, renewed impetus was given to doctrinal praching and teaching accompanied by applicaton of that doctrine to daily life.
B.M. Palmer's biographer writes about the change God brought to the lower part of South Carolina as a result of the Great Awakening.
"Horse-racing, gambling and hard drinking had prevailed to a considerable extent in early colonial times. Nor had these habits been uprooted by the preaching of Whtiefield, though they had been checked. But provinces connected with the Revolutionary War, the work of evangelical ministes of all denominations, and particularly the revivals under the Rev. Daniel Baker about 1831, did much to lift up the standard of morality and religion. The communities in which he grew up were Sabbath-observing, condemned worldly amusements, often thought to be entirely compatible with the profession of Christianity, and in general showed a sympathy with a mildly Puritan mode of Life." [113]
But just the opposite was happening in the North. Under the influences of the Jews Christianity morality and thought was in decline; until today there is little True Christianity left in the North. But not surprisingly Puritan writings were once again popular. Similar testimonies could be given for other areas throughout the antebellum South.
The Southerners believed that God is sovereign in all things. He alone converts sinners. He is the Lord of all things. Thus Christians must see Christ not only as their Savior but also as their Master. They are to serve Christ not only on Sunday, but on all seven days of the week. No doubt they must be mindful of Christ's words, "Buy why do you call Me Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?" [114] Southerners firmly held to the inspired, infallible Scripture as their rule of faith and practice. Scripture "is prof8itable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, throughly equipped for every good work." [115] One of many areas in which evangelicals had socail impact in the South was in that of dueling. Among the wealthy, in particular, dueling was the traditional way to preserve one's honor and to settle arguments. To fail to answer a call to a duel was to brand oneself a coward. Societies were formed to promote reconciliation through mediation. [116] Although dueling did not end at this time, the labor of Chrisitans called public attention to this unbiblical practice and provided solid moral basis for reform.
The God who provided atonement for the elect through the active and passive obedience of His eternal Son, Jesus Christ, also provided for the daily needs that existed throughout His creation. Thus there was a daily dependence on God and a desire to walk by faith even in time of great trial and difficulty. Prayer, was important, as was daily obedience. It is not surprising that many Southerners took seriously their covenantal responsibilities. Christians understood that through Christ, God had brought man into a saving relationship with Him. Homes in which there wree one or more Christians were homes in which there were manifold opportunities to live out the Gospel and to sow good Gospel seen on the soil of unsaved hearts. Having a saving relationship with God meant, therefore, a change in relationships with others.
Families often ministered to the needs of relatives; if a home or barn burned their neighbors would join in and rebuild; if sickness invaded ones home, the neighbors would pitch in and perform the chores until the sick returned to health. A neighborness that had long been abandonded in the North, because of the Jews influence to make money out of any tragedy of a Christian neighbor. A first cousin, a Christian, provided a home for J.H. Thornwell's widowed mother and her children. Such help was understood to to be accompanied by a strong Biblical work ethic on the part of the person helped. Thus, Thornwell's biographer provides this insight regarding Thornwell's mother:
"In the beautiful language of Rudolph Stier, 'Man lifts his imploring, empty hand to heaven, and God lays work upon it; thus hast thou thy bread.' By weaving, serving, and such forms of lator as ws suited to her sex, she was enabled, not onlyt to 'give meat to her household' but to serve to them such elementary education as the neighborhood afforded." [117]
Another incident in Thornwell's own family shows family ministry and the entrusting of itself to God's providential hand in the mindst of trials. Following an illness of less than a week, his eldest daughter died at the age of twenty:
"When it became apparent that she must die, he took his eife into the adjoining room and there the two knelt and prayed for help and submission. At intervals, he read and prayed with the departing one; and she, in the triumph of her faith, became his comforter, and sought with words to reconcile him to the inevitable separation." [118]
The scene becomes more poignant as the writer points out that this daughter was to have been married that week. The wedding announcements had already been sent out. Those traveling from a distance arrived in a timely fashion. Thus the wedding attendants became the pallbearers. She was buried in her wedding dress and the following was inscribed on her tombstone: "Prepared as a Brid Adorned For Her Husband." [119] Thus even at death, Christians were comforted by their saving relationship with God. Through their tears they could at least smile in the blessed work of God inthe lives of family members. This action is simply somthing that the Jews cannot understand and thus hate with undying passion. [120]
��� The Testimony of the Confederate Constitution: The Constitution of the Confederate States of America gives evidence that Christinaity had influenced the South to such a degree that the region realized it must answer to God for its activities. It opens with these words:
"We, the People of the Confederate States, each state acging in its sovereign and indpendent character, inorder to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the blessings of liberty to rouselves and our posterity; invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish this constitution for the Confederate States of America."
Each state recognized its own sovereignty and independence. However, that sovereignty was limited. There was a submission to the fact that God alone was supremely sovereign. He is almighty. Also, the South sought to be mindful that God holds nations, as well as individuals, accountable before Him. The South sought God's favor upon their action.
Meeting in Augusta, Georgia, the newly formed Presbyterian Church in the Confederate States received the following resolution from the eminent theologian James Henley Thornwell, that he desired the Church to approve and send to the Confederate Congress for inclusion in the Confederate Congress for the inclusion in the Confederate Constitution:
"Nevertheless we, the people of these Confederate States, distinctly acknowledge our responsibility to God, and the supremacy of His Son Jesus Christ, as King of Kings and Lord of lords; and hereby ordain that no law shall be passed by the Congress of these Confederate States inconsistent with the will of God, as revealed in the Holy Scriptures." [121]
However, there was insufficent time to farily debate this resolution, and it was withdrawn. [122] Yet, it does provide further evidence of the Southern belief that man must live his life out under God not only within the family but also nationally. Further reason for the Jews hatered of the South and its people, so evident even today.
Southerners also realized that covenantal disobedience, if not repented of, would lead to God's judgment [123]. Anne Loveland provides these insights from her research:
"Indeed, they pointed to epidemics, drought, panics, steamboat disasters, and other 'public calamities' as indications of God's disapproval and warnings of a worse chastisement yet to come. They saw the hand of Providence in all things; in 'national affliction' as well as blessings. Thus the nationof a social covenant between God and the American people was an integral part of their thinking. Evangelicals believed that so long as Americans followed God's laws, conducting themselves as befitted citizens of a Christian commonwealth, they might be expected to be rewarded with peace, well-being, and prosperity. However, if they departed from the path of righteiousness; as evangelicals contended they were doing, then they must expect divine punishment." [124]
Southerners were particularly concerned about drunkeness, desecration of the Lord's Day, infidelity, and the rise of a democratic government that was driven by the people's will.
This sort of reliance on Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ had to be stopped, before it could spread to the North; or the Jews would find themselves once again being driven from the United States as they had been from every other country in Europe at one time or the other. Americans could not be allowed to learn the great and wonderful blessings they could receive from such faith in God, and the White Americans would come to realize what a few had already learned, that the True Tribes of Israel were the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and Kindred Peoples of the earth, and that the Jews were the Seed of Satan, murderers, thieves, and the sworn enemies of Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Being an agrarian society, there was much less movement in the South than in the North. Due to more available jobs, immigrants entered northern states much more frequently than they did in the South. With the maintenance of the status quo in the South it was easier to get to know people as people. Undergirded with the fact that other people are image-bearers of God, there was appreciation of the work and calling of others. Indeed, there were various classes in society with slaves being the lowest class. Only a small minority of Southerners held slaves: "It must be remembered as well that of the 5.3 million whites in the South, only about 300,000 were slaveholders (about 6% of the population)." [125] There was the recognition oby the owners, that for the plantations to prosper the work of others was essential.
Many Southerners did not see slavery as being inopposition to Scripture. Christians could point ot numerous references to slavery in Scripture. Paul, for example, sent the slave Onesimus back to his master Philemon� accompanied by a letter (Philemon 1). Many Christians in the South did not believe the church should speak to issues such as slavery. While condemning slave trade, the Southeners did not see the holding of these slaves as sin. It is only fair to point out that the slaves could not be immediately released. In the South there were free blacks and even black slave owners. Many slaves did not have sufficient money to buy property nor would they be able to easily find a job even if they were released. Many slaves had great respect for the white masters and realized that their condition here, especially as they had come to saving faith in Christ, was far superior to their former condition in Africa. Having inherited slaves from preceding generations or owning land worked with slave labor, many masters shought to provide for their needs, as both groups labored to make the plantations prosper.
��� Crucial Lessons for Today: From the examples given of the antebellum South, we can draw several enduring lessons for our day. A belief in God's Word as governing all of life must be the basic fact on which any society is to be properly built. Southerners believed their Constitution was God's Word. Thus they were to govern their lives accordingly. Southerners also took the U.S. Constitution seriously. Their representatives had ratified the Constitution in good faith that those written words were honorable and true. When they realized that the Federal Government was not going to honor the Tenth Amendment and instead limit the rights of states far beyond what the Constitution allowed, they believed they had no choice but to secede.
Today many evangelicals rightly deny the unconstitutional actions of the various branches of government. As they fail to see the enemy of God, the Jews, pulling the strings of government from behind the scenes. Yet they fail to take seriously that higher Constitution, God's Word. The relevance of God's law is too often denied. Proponents of the continuance of the general equity of God's law often meet with more opposition from within the church than they do from the world itself. Christians must take seriously the inspired Word of God as our command word for daily life. As we proclaim this message, then we can begin to point out, without hypocrisy, the importance of the words of that lesser constitution; that of our own civil government.
Overall, the South lived in terms of God's sovereignty. Naturally its citizens opposed the rising sovereignty of the central government. Removal of the constitutional limits to the sovereigjnty of the federal government would open the door to unbounded sovereignty at the national level. Such sovereignty could in time compete with God's sovereignty. Such a civil government could replace God as the one to whom future generations would look for cradle-to-grave security. Time has prove them correct, with the welfare state in effect today in America.
With the Confedereacy's defeat in 1865, the last one hundred and thirty years have been a time of increasing growth of civil government. The Confederate leaders were right. Under God, government must be limited. The individual must be self-governed. Family government and other realms of government must operate properly. Without Biblical government at the grass roots (individual, family), one can expect the rise of centralized government. A strong central government will not be properly changed unless there is a return to responsible self and family government.
Our desire shold not be for the South to rise again. It was nto a perfect society in spite of its high regard for Christianity. History is linear; forward moving, not ciruclar, longing for a return to a past day. We should be desirous of seeing the Biblical aspects of Southern culture become our practice. We need a return to honoring God and living out our covenant relationship with Him as basic societal principles.
In His mercy, God allows the blessings of obedience to be operative for a thousand generations [126]. although the South lost the War, its region has been one to which many have desired to move. Even in our generation, the South is referred to as the "Bible Belt" because of the continuing influence of Christianity in its culture. Many will tesitfy to the friendliness of the people. There is much family solidarity. It is in the Southern states, much more so than the North, that convicted murderers are executed. It was not until recent years that the Lord's Day has become, because of Jewish influence in business, just another business day by local store owners. At the same time we are increasingly seeing in the South a turning away from Biblical teaching resulting in consequences such as less respect for one another, the breakdown of family units through physical abuse, divorce, and the acceptance of other unbiblical practices. Too many Southerners have taken God's covenantal blessings for granted, without realizing that these blessings are not our rights but indeed representative of God's mercy. Failure to belive that crime, family breakdown and socialtal degeneration can move into rural areas, many Southerners have failed to stand against humanism and take seriously Christ's crown rights over all of life.
Southern Christians have been slow to deal with social ills. Yet, looking at the social ills today (the modern welfare system that spans the the races might well be viewed as a type of slavery), we ralize that once in place, social problems are not reformed overnight. Many wish the South had acted in a Biblical fashion in dealing with slavery. However, it behooves Christians in our day to be busy applying Biblical truth to the social ills of our culture. To prepare for the war that is to come against the enemies of God and their allies.
"How then was it that this Government (Northern American Federal Government), several years after the war was over, found itself owing in London and Wall Street several hundred million dollars to men who never fought a battle, who never made a uniform, never furnished a pound of bread, who never did an honest day's work in all their lives?...The facts is, that billions owned by the sweat, tears and blood of American laborers have been poured into the coffers of these men for absolutely nothing. This 'sacred war debt' was only a gigantic scheme of fraud, concocted by European capitalists and enacted into American laws by the aid of American Congressmen, who were their paid hirelings or their ignorant dupes. That this crime has remained uncovered is due to the power of prejudice which seldom permits the victim to see clearly or reason correctly: 'The money power prolongs its reign by working on prejudices." [127]
Therefore, with a close study the "American Civil War" was fought because of financial interests, Jewish Interntional Banking Interests:
"If this mischievous financial policy (the United States Government issuing interest‑free and debt‑free money) which had its origin in the North American Republic during the war (1861‑65) should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every Monarch on the globe!" [128]
At the head of this money power was the Jewish Rothschild family, who in 1857, met in London to devise a "divide and conquer" plan to destroy the economic freedom of the people of the United States. The Rothschilds had their agents planted in both the North and South to maneuver the country into Civil War. In the north they had the Jewish financier August Belmont. The Belmont financial interests were well recognized as being an "American representative of the European banking house of the Rothschilds." [129]
The Jewish lawyer, Judah P. Benjamin, was chosen by the Rothschilds to do their work in the South. He managed to become a "leader of the Southern wing of the Democratic Party" and as a U.S. Senator avidly "promoted secession." He consequently has been called "the brains of the revolt." Benjamin held several high positions in the Confederacy where he continued to direct the actions of the Confederacy according to the plans laid out by his masters in London and Paris.
During the Civil War, the armies and governments of both North and South were financed with huge loans by the Rothschilds. These Jewish financiers understood all too well the principle that "the borrower is servant to the lender." [130] Their agents had strong influences on the treasuries of both governments to assure loans were made.
Legally speaking the American Civil War, was not a war between "North" and "South," even though there were physical battles between them. In legal parlance, that war was an international conflict being waged by an alien race, the Plutocratic Jews, for the destruction of the law and government of the White Israelites of America ‑ The Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and Kindred people. It was a war between two separate races who held two distinct ideals of law and morality.
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ The Knights of the Golden Circle
The division of the American nation and ensuing war was a necessary step to overthrow the true government and laws of the nation. This task was achieved by the Plutocratic elite through their use of the Jewish‑Masonic organization known as The Knights of the Golden Circle. The purpose of this subversive organization is shown in the following excerpt:
"Knights of the Golden Circle, the name of an organization founded for the overthrow of the Government of the United States. It was A Secret Society, and was first organized for action in the slave‑labor States. The members were pledged to assist in the accomplishment of the designs of those who were intent upon the establishment of an empire within the limits of the Golden Circle. It was the soul of the filibustering movements in Central America and Cuba from 1850 to 1857; and when these failed, the knights concentrated their energies for the accomplishment of their prime object ‑ The Destruction of the Union and the perpetuation of slavery." [131]
The Knights of the Golden Circle was a part of the Masonic Scottish Rite. Members of the Scottish Rite established the Knights of the Golden Circle in Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1854. Between 1855 and 1860, this secret order had recruited, armed, and trained about 100,000 men in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Virginia, and Maryland.
"While the Knights of the Golden Circle, the military preorganization of the Confederacy, was being organized under the control of the Scottish Rite's Northern chief, the Swiss J.J. Gourgas, and his lieutenant Killian Henry Van Rensselaer, the Southern Jurisdiction of the Rite was organizing the political leadership for the secession itself. The man in charge of this project was Albert Pike of Newburyport, Massachusetts." [132]
The order of the Knights of the Golden Circle were the instigators and promoters of political and physical rebellion throughout the South, they were the real "secessionists" and "insurrectionists." The true Southern leadership, including Jefferson Davis, Alexander H. Stephens, Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson, Sam Houston, and other such men were all against secession. Generally, the sentiment of the South was pro‑Union and secession Was Not a popular movement.
Robert E. Lee in a letter to his son, dated January 23, 1861, he wrote:
��� "...I see that four states have declared themselves out of the Union; four more will apparently follow their example. Then, if the border states are brought into the gulf of revolution, one half of the country will be arrayed against the other. I must try and be patient and awit the end, for I can do nothing to hasten or retard it.
��� The South, in my opinion, has been aggrieved by the acts of the Nort. As you say, I feel the aggression and am willing to take every proper step for redress. It is the principle I contend for, not individual or private benefit. As an American citizen, I take great pride in my country, her prosperity and institutions, and would defend any state if her rights were invaded. But I can anticipate no greater calamity for the country than a dissolution of the Union. It would be an accumulation of all the evils we complain of and I am willing to sacrifice everything but honor for its preservation. I hope, therefore that all constitutional means will be exhausted before there is a resort to force. Secession is nothing but revolution. The framers of the Constitution never exhausted so muchy labor, wisdom, and forbearance in its formation, and surrounded it with so many guards and securities, if it was intended to be broken by every member of the Confederacy at will. It qas intended for 'perpetual union,' so expressed in the preamble, and for the establishment of a government, not a compact, which can only be dissolved by revolution or the consent of all the people in convention assembled. It is idle to talk of secession. Anarchy would have been established, and not a governmetn, by Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison, and the other patriots of the Revolution..."
Lee closed with this realistic appraisal:
"Still, a Union tht can only be maintained by swords and bayonets, and in which strife and civil wars are to take the place of brotherly love and kindness, has no charm for me. I shall mourn for my country and for the welfare and progress of mankind. If the Union is dissolved, and the government disrupted, I shall return to my native state and share the miseries of my people; and, save in defense, will draw my sword on none."
By the time the Civil War started the Knights of the Golden Circle claimed at least 65,000 armed and drilled recruits in the deep South [133]. It was this military organization which became the heart of the Confederate States of America, who provided the military backbone and enforcement for the Confederate insurrection. The bulk of the true Southern mainstream was sucked into the whirlwind of their planned insurrection, being left with no choice but to fight in defense of the consequential retaliation to that insurrection.
Nearly every aspect of the Southern policy on secession, war, and the formation of a new government was derived from members of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry or the Knights of the Golden Circle.
"The Secessionists, controlling the state governments of South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas met at Montgomery, Alabama, under the chairmanship of Scottish Rite Supreme Council Member Howell Cobb. They announced the establishment of the Southern 'Confederacy,' and designated Jefferson Davis of Mississippi as President of their rump nation. He made fairly good window‑dressing for their insurrection, being both a Southerner and an American." [134]
When Governor Sam Houston of Texas prevented his state from seceding from the union, he was deposed by a secessionist coup backed by thousands of armed paramilitary Knight of the Golden Circle. When Fort Sumter became the focus of strategic concern for the nation, members of the Knights of the Golden Circle served as officers in the South Carolina forces "to supervise the attack on Fort Sumpter which started the Civil War." [135]
Since the objective of this secret Masonic order was the "overthrow of the government of the United States, and destroy Christianity" they obviously had in plan the establishment of a new government, one based upon the law that guided their order, a Jewish Talmudic law, which is the basis of their de facto government.
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Prize - The South's Wealth
The assessed valuation of all United States property in 1860 was $12‑billion. One‑half of that was in 11 Southern States with only 8‑million Whites [136] These 8‑million Whites exported 57% of the total exports of the nation. The plan was to bind the South and take her wealth. With a bonus to Eliminate a Nation of Kings, The Natural Competitors of the Ultimate Ruler of the World.
War would be necessary since the South could not be expected to willingly give away wealth that had taken over 250 years to accumulate. Then, too, war is good for business. In fact, it is the best of the several ways to force money to be borrowed into existence in a usury society [137]
The usual way the media goes about creating a war climate is:
� 1). "The enemy" must be made to appear unlawful. He must be made to appear criminal, one that must be restrained and punished for the good and safety of all.
� 2). The public must be made to believe that the enemy is going to attack them. If the enemy can be made to strike the first blow, opinions harden and unite on war, and "happy days are here again" as war contracts go out.
Is there any doubt that this will work? Think about the wonderful results the media obtained in the so‑called "Gulf War." Where they absolutely convinced most Americans that Hussein must be destroyed in Iraq or he would invade America next!
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Chosen Issue - Radical Abolition
The public issue of the day was the colonization program; the purchasing, freeing, and sending of the slaves back to Africa. It was a subject freely discussed in almost every social setting. It was on the tip of everyone's tongue; a subject ready for the media's propagandist twist. The media took Thomas Jefferson's abolition plan, adopted it, revised it by leaving out "compensation" and "repatriation," and started their own propaganda campaign.
Jefferson's abolition plan minus colonization nullified all that the colonization plan was created to correct, the protection of the White workers from cheap alien labor and the protection of the White race from destruction through contact with strangers and learning their ways. And, of course, to prevent the inevitable interbreeding that always result when two peoples live in the same land.
This selection of the abolition issue was a work of genius. it could not fail to succeed where a media monopoly existed. The way it was developed was even more inspired. The media stopped virtually all reference to colonization. They stopped almost all reference to payment for freed slaves. Abolition took on meaning that was harsh and sinister. It was the San Domingo campaign all over again, done by the same international bankers in the same manner. All that was new was the victim.
The only topic the media discussed from 1830 on was the evil of slavery, a topic on which the entire nation agreed. The evil was embellished with reports of the brutality of slave owners. Not only were the slave owners brutes, but they were pictured as fiends who delighted in devising vile punishments to inflict on helpless Black wretches.
The story as it appeared in the northern media was the atrocity story, of which we have become so familiar: slave owners were treating slaves in a shameful manner, they were the servants of the devil and any punishment meted out to such evil creatures was too good. Northern city dwellers traveled very little in those days. They were dependent on others to furnish news of outside events. They only knew what they read in the newspapers and had no way of telling if the stories were true or false. But, they believed if the newspapers printed it; then it must be true. Because then, just as now, Americans could not bring themselves to believe that there were traitors who would destroy our country if only they could.
If what the media said was actually going on in the south, if slaves were being beaten, starved, and maltreated wholesale for pleasure, and if good Black "Christian" slave families were being broken up and sold away from each other just so the plantation master could enjoy the female without the irate slave husband around, the hard opinions were justified. But, it was lying Jewish propaganda.
It was "implied" at first, and later outright demanded, that instant freedom, minus payment and colonization, be granted these "poor" drown‑trodden wretches from these slaveholding fiends, even if force had to be used to do it. The word "force" began to enter the papers with increasing frequency and urgency. Money was lavished on this new radical abolition campaign on a scale not seen since the French Revolution. Revolutionary tracts were printed and sent to the salves in the South by the case.
As far back as 1835, John Quincy Adams noted in his diary:
"Anti‑slavery associations are formed in this country and in England and they are already co‑operating in concerted agency together. They have raised funds to support and circulate inflammatory newspapers and pamphlets gratuitously, and they send multitudes of them into the Southern country into the midst of swarms of slaves." [138]
This was Haiti all over again. The same sort of tracts had appeared among the slaves in Haiti to foment a revolt that exterminated the Whites. The main difference was that these were printed in English while those used in Haiti were in French. The content was the same, the style was the same, and the demands were the same. There were white refugees from Haiti living in Virginia who could identify the tracts and testify as to the results they produced.
Margaret Mercer of Maryland, who had freed her slaves, was incensed by the writings of William Lloyd Garrison. In a letter to a friend she says:
"This is my apology for feeling and expressing the deepest indignation against the man who dares to throw the firebrand into the powder magazine while all are asleep and stands himself at a distance to see the mangled victims of his barbarous fury." [139]
The amazing thing is that through it all the northern people hadn't the faintest idea that the media were trying to foment a slave revolt in the South, and were using them as pawns in the great game of war. They had no way of knowing. The tracts sent to the Southern slaves weren't the same as the editorials appearing in the northern newspapers. Each was slanted to its own particular audience.
Money continued to pour into the campaign. The mails were full of insurrection propaganda. Southern reaction against this incendiary printed matter is given in the following letter by The Rev. Nehemiah Adams, of Boston, who visited Virginia in 1854. He wrote:
"When these amalgamation pictures were discovered (pictures showing interracial couples in all sorts of poses)...Who can wonder that they broke into the post‑office and seized and burned abolition papers; indeed no excesses are surprising in view of the perils to which they saw themselves exposed." [140]
In his message to Congress in December 1860, President Buchanan wrote:
"The incessant and violent agitation of the slavery question through the North for the last quarter of a century has at last produced its malign influence on the slaves...Hence a sense of security no longer exists around the family altar. A feeling of peace at home has given place to apprehension of servile insurrection."
George Lunt of Boston, wrote:
"It thus appears that an active and alarming system of aggression against the South was in operation at the North thirty years ago, threatening to excite servile insurrection, to imperil union, to stir up civil war." [141]
Professor John Burgess of Columbia University wrote:
"If the whole thing, both as to time, methods, and results, had been planned by his Satanic Majesty himself, it could not have succeeded better in setting the sound conservative movements of the age at naught...No man who is acquainted with the change of feeling which occurred in the South...can regard Harper's Ferry villainy as any other than one of the chiefst crimes of our history..."
Brown and his band had murdered five men and wounded some eight or ten more in their criminal movement at Harper's Ferry. In Kansas, Brown's gang mutilated prisoners by cutting off arms, etc. [142] His activities were well publicized in the South. When the Northern media wrote approvingly of these acts the South's wrath knew no bounds. The south acted as people are supposed to act when being conditioned for war.
"Add to this the consideration that Brown certainly intended the wholesale massacre of the Whites by the Blacks...it was certainly natural that the tolling of the church bells, the holding of prayer‑meetings for the soul of John Brown, the draping of houses, the half‑masting of flags, etc., in many parts of the North should appear to the people of the South to be evidences of a wickedness which knew no bounds..." [143]
Slave owners in Kansas reacted to John Brown's attacks by organizing vigilante committees for their own protection as it was meant that they should. This played into the hands of the media. This defensive organization and its protective measures were interpreted by the press to their Northern readers as aggressive acts directed against all abolitionists. This was the justification they needed to assert that the North must now arm to protect itself against hostile and aggressive Southern slave owners who threatened to spread their evil society over all the country. The whole affair only cost a few hundred thousand dollars.
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� America's Hidden Rulers
The manipulation and instigation of the American Civil War by Jewish powers had profound legal ramifications. The Jews knew that such a war would cause both sides to violate fundamental principles and established Christian Laws. Both North and South violated the Law of God which says you shall not "fight against your brethren" without a just cause. Just as God brought Israel into alien captivity for its gross violations and unjust actions against its brethren, so too God brought about a captivity upon Americans by alien, Plutocratic Jews, not a physical captivity, but a legal captivity resulting in a legal revolution.
The Civil War was, in a legal sense, an international war between America and the International Banking Monopoly of the Jews, and the victor of that war was the Jews. However, since they did not engage in any successful armed insurrection, as they did with Russia [144], they had no right to physical occupation and control. But God gave America into their hands, by giving them legal control over the national government.
The Civil Was was the second step of the legal control and captivity the Plutocratic Jews had over the U.S. Government and legal system. The Civil Rights Acts, the Reconstruction Acts, the 14th and 15th Amendments were all revolutionary in nature, being based on Jewish-Socialistic-Communistic-Zionist principles which are contrary and foreign to the original American system. The Constitution, State autonomy, and the freedoms of the White citizenry were severe barriers for the advancement of these Judeo‑Socialist principles. Since they did not possess physical control, the Jews could only make advancements against the States or citizenry by deception and legal entrapments.
Surprisingly parallel to Lee's "secessionis nothing but revolution" was Abraham Lincoln's view. We have previously noted Lincoln's primary commitment to the preservation of the Union. Although backed by Abolitionists, Lincoln's platform did even mention slaver, prior to his electionas a so-called "sectional President" in 1860. Lincoln's first inaugural sums up his Constitutional perspective:
��� "I hold that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution, the Union of these States in perpetual. Perpetuity is implied if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all national governments. It is safe is assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution, and the Union will endure forever, it beingimpossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument itself.
��� Again: If the United States be not a government proper, but an association of States in the nature of contract merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it? One party to a contract may violate it; break it, so to speak, but does it not requrie all to lawfully rescind it?
��� Descending from these general principles, we find the proposition that in legal contemplation the Union is perpetual confirmed by the history of the Union itslef. The Union is much older that the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And finally, in 1787, one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was 'form a more perfect union.'"
From time to time one could find an agent or debtor of the Jews in political office to directly advance their cause and principles of socialism. The first president they had control over to some degree was the second Jewish President Woodrow Wilson, who paid his debts to them by signing the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Franklin D. Roosevelt, the third Jewish President, has proven to be the greatest benefactor to the Jews for the destruction of fundamental American principles and the establishment of Marxist‑Talmudic laws and Judaic‑Socialism to that time.
"Until Roosevelt became president, the Protestant elite both reigned and ruled in Washington. To be sure, Catholics and Jews had been rewarded with occasional appointments, but essentially the government had been run by Protestant descendants of old‑stock Americans. When Roosevelt took office, he set the tone for an administration that recruited people on the basis of their intellectual and administrative talents, not their heritage. As a result, large numbers of Catholics, Jews, and blacks found opportunities to utilize their professional skills." [145]
Roosevelt was very discriminatory in appointing to government positions only those who had "intellectual talents" geared towards the principles of Socialism‑Zionism. While Jews constituted only about 3 percent of the population, "they made up 15 percent of the higher civil service and upper‑echelon appointments during Roosevelt's presidency." Contemporaries sensed this overrepresentation and denounced the so‑called "Jew Deal" and its destructive measures.
Roosevelt brought many Jews into the White House orbit and New Deal agencies. The Jew, David Niles of Boston, "roamed as a behind‑the‑ scenes political emissary," and the Jewish attorney Ben Cohen from Indiana, "wrote some of the New Deal's most significant legislation." [146] The Jewish financier Bernard Baruch was called "elder statesman because he has advised many Presidents." [147]
Jewish subversives have also continued the use of private or secret organizations to alter or abrogate American principles by covert legal means and to gain further control of the government and people. Some of these include the Council on Foreign Relations, the Masonic orders, and the Trilateral Commission whose members are Presidents, Senators, and Judges, with their objective being a new (de facto) government.
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Martial Law Rule in America
While much of the defacto nature of the government in America has been achieved by gradual and stealthy deviations from established laws and principles, certain principles surrounding American law and government were too prevalent to change except by force. Some of these principles include the fact that only White persons could govern or be citizens, that the States were independent political entities, and that the foundation of American rested on Christian principles. Martial law or military force is a common tool used in subverting or displacing the established law and to compel the citizenry to accept a change in the law.
The exercise of martial law has been used by existing governments which desire to step outside its lawful bounds, thus governing unlawfully or in a de facto mode. It also has been used by subversive forces infiltrating a nation to overturn the existing government and law. Certain modes of martial law have been instrumental in bringing about a de facto government in America. We thus need to understand the nature and scope of martial law and how it has been used in the past.
��� Martial Law and American Law: Martial law is essentially a system of rule through the use of military personnel. It is said to exist only when the nation is actually in a state war and when hostile forces have expelled the governing power and incapacitated its civil courts. It thus is instituted out of sheer necessity, and, since all civil authority is overrun, a military officer assumes authority.
"Martial law is the law of military necessity in the actual presence of war. It is administered by the general of the army, and is in fact his will. Of necessity it is arbitrary; but must be obeyed." [148]
The manner of government that prevails today would not only be foreign to the Founding Fathers, but would be repugnant to them as well. The 14th Amendment has steadily caused revolutionary changes in the principles and structure of the government in America. It has greatly influenced the acts of legislators, governors, presidents, judges, and bureaucrats. Due to this, the 14th Amendment (and supporting legislation such as the Civil Rights Acts) has been referred to as a "new constitution," as being a basis of new governmental powers.
Wherever the tenets and principles of the "new constitution" are resisted, or wherever the original principles of American government and law (de jure) are supported or implemented, the "new" (de facto) government is quick to meet such measures with force, the same manner of arbitrary force which gave birth to the new government. The 13th and 14th Amendments (known as the "war amendment") along with the Reconstruction Acts, were the beginning of a de facto government, using force, fraud and usurpation to oust the original de jure government of America.
"A de facto government is one that maintains itself by A Display of Force against the will of the rightful legal government, and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof." [149]
The U.S. Supreme Court in deciding on the nature of such a de facto government recognized it as "a government of paramount force." The Court further stated that:
"(A de facto government's) distinguishing characteristics are (1), that its existence is Maintained by Active Military Power within the territories, and against the rightful authority of an established and lawful government; and (2), that while it exists, it must necessarily be obeyed in civil matters by private citizens who, by acts of obedience, Rendered in Submission to such force, do not become responsible, as wrongdoers, for those acts, though not Warranted by the laws of the rightful government." [150]
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Modern Day Martial Law Rule
This "government by force" is quite characteristic of the government that now rules America. Whenever traditional American principles are attempted to be upheld, such as those surrounding money and taxation, we see the National Guard, FBI, U.S. Marshalls, Federal Agents, SWAT teams or police sent in to prevent original principles from being exercised. It is not the money they are concerned about but rather the protection of one type of law from the influence of another. It is conflict between two diametrically opposing principles of law, that is to say, Talmudic law versus Christian law.
It would be rather naive to view the illegal exercise of martial law acts as something that may have occurred during the Civil War, but had vanished along with the war. This notion is just as foolish as the belief that Martial Law was confined strictly to the Southern States during the Civil War. The events of that war established a foundation for that type of arbitrary and illegal rule which continues to this day.
When the war ended, proclamations by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson declared that the "said insurrection is at an end." [151] However, the Reconstruction period proved that Congress did not feel it was at an end but rather continued to enact measures as though the war or "insurrection" still prevailed.
In the two proclamations declaring the insurrection to be ended, there was specific mention of every proclamation made by Lincoln during the war that dealt with insurrection, thus implying that these proclamations were revoked. However, Lincoln's "Maritla Law Proclamation" was never mentioned and was never Specifically Revoked!
The Civil War allowed new concepts in law and government to be instituted and used, concepts that were contrary to the principles of the Fundamental Christian law of America. These new, anti‑Christ, anti‑American concepts have periodically been exercised by the "Federal Government" to the present day.
The crux of this new power is represented within the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments. Congress added to these amendments a Power Clause which said that, "Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." Within these Amendments Congress bestowed arbitrary powers unto itself, giving it complete power over the status, life, liberty, property, due process, voting rights, privileges and immunities of colored persons.
Now, not only was the Executive and the military to be the guardian and protector of the Negro, but Congress also. The intent of the civil war was not for the noble claim of "reserving the union" or even the destruction of slavery, but to elevate the black race and lower the status and freedom of the White Race, to divest the States of their rights and independent powers, and to dismantle the Christian foundation of the nation. This is too hard to deny since this was the outcome of the war and the trend followed by the government ever since.
The enemies of Christian America never had the ability to invade the country and overturn its laws and principles of government as they did with Russia in 1917. Only be establishing a secret de facto government, one which can wield arbitrary force (martial law rule), could the traditional Christian American principles be superseded. The rights of the States have been the greatest obstacle of the plutocrat's plan to control the government and establish talmudic/socialist/communistic/Zionist laws.
Thus, it was not until the 1950's that any significant headway could be made in this plan. The Brown vs. Board of Education edict of the de facto Supreme Court in 1954 (347 U.S. 483), opened the door for offensive measures from the de facto Federal Government against the States and their institutions in regard to race.
On September 24, 1957, the 5th Jewish President Eisenhower sent about 1000 Federal Troops to Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, to force local school officials, "at the point of a bayonet," to integrate the school. This was an act of Martial Law, the arbitrary use of the military to govern civil matters.
In September of 1962, when Governor Barnett of Mississippi prevented a Negro from entering the University of Mississippi, President Kennedy sent in Federal troops to override the State's decision on segregation and to force the University to admit the Negro.
In 1963, Governor Wallace of Alabama "stood in the schoolhouse door" in order to prevent Federal Marshals from registering black students at the University of Alabama. Again Kennedy sent federal troops in to remove the Governor and overturn state law.
The use of such force to unlawfully suppress the actions of the de jure government when the need arises is most often done under some form of martial law measures. It has of recent been the means by which the de facto government enforces its heavy progressive "income tax" against the white citizenry in an attempt to enslave them. The de facto government has raised an army of agents, bureaucrats and operatives to maintain and protect that tax system. Under the exercise of martial law powers, these "agents" will make warrantless searches, seizures, and arrests in order to suppress those that resist that system.
Benjamin Franklin once stated:
"The more the people are discontented with the oppression of taxes; the greater need for the prince (or government) has of money, to distribute among his partizans and pay The Troops that are to Suppress All Resistance, and enable him to plunder at pleasure. There is scarce a king in a hundred who would not, if he could follow the example of Pharaoh, get first all the people's money, then all their lands, and then make them and their children servants forever." [152]
Along these same lines Caesar was noted for saying:
"With money we will get men, and with men we will get money."
Any warrantless arrest by a peace officer, if challenged, is presumptively invalid, and the burden of proof is on the state or arresting officer to justify it as one not only authorized by statute, but as not violative of the constitutional guarantee against invasion of privacy. [153] If the burden is not met, the arrest is unlawful. An unlawful arrest is a crime and usually classified as a gross misdemeanor. Because of this, when a peace officer makes an arrest without warrant, "he is a trespasser and acts at his own peril." [154]
In recent times, liberal arrests are made and justified because it is said the officer had "probable cause." As originally used under our constitutional system, probable cause was not an excuse or reason for arrest, it was one of the requirements for a warrant, "No Warrant shall issue but upon probable cause."
The history of the use of arrests (especially of recent times) shows that police, sheriffs, marshals, etc., have not possessed the knowledge or respect for the rights of liberty and privacy which the Law of the Land proclaims for every citizen. An appalling number of arrests are illegal. Much of the blame for this rests with the "Slave mentality" which people acquired, and act like programed robots when it comes to the government or police telling them what to do, even when it flagrantly violates their rights. Under a government of slavery people are educated that government is supreme and cannot be resisted.
Just as the peace officer must determine if the circumstances justify whether he can make an arrest, the citizen must determine if the attempted arrest is legal or not. It is a well‑settled principle that a person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest and use what force is necessary in defense of his liberty:
"The offense of resisting arrest, both at common law and under statute, presupposes a lawful arrest. It is axiomatic that every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such case the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by use of force, as in self‑defense. [155] What rights then has a citizen in resisting an unlawful arrest? An arrest without warrant is a trespass, an unlawful assault upon the person, and how far one thus unlawfully assaulted may go in resistance is to be determined, as in other cases of assault. Life and liberty are regarded as standing substantially on one foundation; life being useless without liberty. And the authorities are uniform that where one is about to be unlawfully deprived of his liberty he may resist the aggressions of the offender, whether of a private citizen or a public officer, to the extent of taking the life of the assailant, if that be necessary to preserve his own life, or prevent infliction upon him of some great bodily harm." [156]
It has to be understood that the right to freely detain and arrest individuals is one of the most important tools a corrupt and despotic government has in maintaining control over the populace. In its eyes all arrests are lawful and all resistance to it is unlawful; even the slightest objection to the arrest is to be checked with extra‑physical force. Resistance is an affront to the legal system and the jobs of those enforcing that system. If people can actually be conditioned to believe that the police can stop them and arrest them any time for any cause the policeman claims is justified (as they see on TV), then they have no liberty and are but slaves to be commanded and punished at the whim of their master, their god (the government).
All de facto governments need a legal system that provides and supports the power to make liberal arrests so as to keep the principles of the de jure government from surfacing. In America the de facto government has established this "power" at both local and national levels.
The entire concept of proper and lawful arrests under our American system has been further corrupted in order to further gain control over the citizenry. This has been achieved through a variety of methods used in conjunction with arrest, such as fingerprinting, measuring and photographing, blood tests, breath tests, etc., all before the person is ever convicted of any crime. As many courts have shown, such actions are a violation of one's right of privacy.
"To charge that one's finger print records have been taken would ordinarily convey an imputation of crime, and very probably support a complaint for libel per se. In my judgment, a compulsory finger printing before conviction is an unlawful encroachment upon a person, in violation of the state Constitution. [157] Was the act of the officers of the police department in compelling the petitioner to submit to having his photograph taken and these measurements and imprints (fingerprints) made a lawful, to such indignities, is certainly unnecessary in order to 'detect and arrest' him; for he must have been detected and arrested before he can be so dealt with. It is unnecessary to 'prevent crime,' for the acts for which indictment has been found, if criminal, have already been committed...The exercise of any such extreme police power as is here contended for is contrary to the spirit of Anglo‑Saxon liberty. [158] To subject a person against his will to a blood test is an assault and battery, and clearly an invasion of his personal privacy...If we admit such an encroachment upon the personal immunity of an individual where in principle can we stop?" [159]
A de facto government would have a great need for collecting data and information on those who would object to the new order of government, so they can be readily identified by its police forces.
All of our traditional principles of natural liberty have now taken a back seat to the oppressive measures of a de facto government through its abusive use of arrest and forcibly extracting information from any citizen it may consider a "criminal." Due process of law requires a warrant to be issued prior to arrest; or in cases where the public security requires an arrest, the alleged offender is to be taken immediately before the nearest sitting magistrate that he may be dealt with according to law. He is not to be take to police headquarters to be photographed, measured, fingerprinted, and jailed.
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� State Rights and Independence
When the colonial States claimed their independence from Britain, they became "Free and Independent States," having "full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which Independent States may of right do." [160] In other words, they became nations on the same footing as any other nation such as France or England. This was essentially their status after the adoption of the U.S. Constitution.
"We choose rather to plant ourselves on what we consider impregnable positions. They are these: That a state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction over all persons and things, within its territorial limits, as any Foreign Nation; where that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the Constitution of the United States." [161]
If the independent status and rights of the States were not retained under the U.S. Constitution, that document Would Never Have Been Ratified.
Our American school children have been taught that the Civil War was fought over the slavery problem, but this was only a surface issue to hide the intrigue of the Great Red Dragon to foment one side against the other. After thousands of our choice White Israel sons and one of our greatest Presidents were murdered, our Great God stopped the slaughter of the Dragon By the Intervention of The Czar of Russia, whom God sent to our National Rescue, but unknown to Most Americans.
After the Dragon saw that he could not destroy our nation through civil war, he undertook to destroy us in another manner. One of which was the passage of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution which for all practical purposes destroyed the Original Constitution. More on this later.
"And the serpent (still in the guise of Rome and some of her apostate daughters of organized religion) cast out of his mouth WATER as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood." [162]
The word "water" has two meanings in Bible symbolism.
1). It means the "Word of God."
2). It means "peoples and races of humanity."
And the serpent has used both meanings in trying to destroy the woman and her seed. So let's check out the first meaning. Ordinarily we think of the "Word of God" as being that which is spoken by only God or His Son Jesus Christ. But Satan who is the god of this World order and also the Prince and Power of the air [163], has a word also which is taught as gospel. It is the wicked doctrines of devils and seducing spirits. Paul warns us of it in 1 Timothy 4:1‑2, Peter in 2 Peter 2:1‑3 of which he (Satan) has been flooding our Israel's Christian Kingdoms (nations) and is being preached as the "Word of God" and the "Gospel of Jesus Christ."
Jesus said:
"Many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ (men/women who come into our churches and say that Jesus is Christ); and shall deceive many...many false prophets (preachers, ministers and etc.) shall arise, and shall deceive many...there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect (they will be such great and convincing speakers that they will be able to deceive all but the very elect). Behold, I have told you before (He, Christ, has given us warning to watch and to study to make ourselves approved ‑ be able to discern these false pastors and ministers [164])." [165]
We can safely say our Nations have been submerged under its evil propaganda and influence. Paul said, when this wicked one, the Red Dragon, would be revealed, his coming is the working of Satan with all power, signs and lying wonders. So that the deceived, through strong delusion would believe a lie rather than the truth [166].
What are some of these cunning lies taught today as the Word of God? Perhaps the first one we should deal with, is that the Jews are the "Chosen People of God." Millions of Christian people have been taught this damnable lie, this Satanic falsehood by the clergy of this nation (America), the nations of Western Europe, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand, until multiplied millions of people have given the International Esau‑Edomite‑Canaanite‑Khazar Jew, a special treatment as the "Chosen of God" and a people who can do no wrong. With the Chosen People status afforded them by Organized Religion, they are hidden from their Red Dragon Identity, as The Children of Satan, and activities in this nation and the world. Jesus identified them in his day, and said:
"Ye serpents (Satan is called that old serpent in the Scriptures, thus Jesus is saying they are serpents‑Satan's Children), ye offspring of vipers (here Jesus identifies their fathers as being Satan's Children also), how can ye escape the damnation of hell (in other words Jesus is in effect saying The Jews Cannot be Saved!)?" [167]
Our clergy stand in the pulpits and declare that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were Jews and the Bible does not once declare that this is true. They were Hebrews, and the words Hebrew, Israel and Jew are not synonymous terms, as our nations people have been brainwashed to believe, so as to hide the "Serpent Jew" behind the Chosen People status.
Furthermore, the Jews and organized religion have coined a dirty phrase to hang onto anyone who dares to expose their evil works. This phrase of words are called "anti‑semitism." But how can one be "anti‑Semitic" when he is more Semitic than most Jews? Since the Jews are claiming "chosen people" status, then who in the world are all of these Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic, Germanic and Kindred people God has been calling out of all the nations where he has scattered them, and is regathering them in America? Are we just "Gentiles" as we have been brainwashed into believing? No wonder the doctrine of America revealed as modern day Israel is heralded from the housetops of every organized church as false doctrine.
To test the validity of this doctrine of Israel's identity, we present the following questions. Who is fulfilling the prophecy of Genesis 35:11 and Genesis 48:19 which was to take place in these last days? Have the Jews become A Great and Mighty Single Nation and also A Company of Nations, whose people are so great in number as to be as the sands of the sea or the stars in the heavens? Of course not. That is already fulfilled by the Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic, Germanic and Kindred people, the White Israel People. Due to the tremendous amount of false teachings that have been done in regards to the Jews, perhaps it would not be inappropriate here to present a brief review of the history of the House of Israel, the House of Judah and the Jews, as related in the Scriptures.
From this point on it will be almost impossible to keep from repeating ourself from time to time. I respectfully request that you take into consideration that fact and realize that this is because the three peoples are so intertwined in history that the threads must cross time and time again as we go along. Was Abraham a Jew? It has often been stated that Abraham was the first Jew. The Bible, however, never calls Abraham by that term and for good reason.
The word "Jew" is merely the modern English contraction for the word "Judahite" or "Judean." Thus, the question is not really whether Abraham was a Jew or not; but rather, was Abraham a Judahite? That is, was Abraham of the tribe of Judah? Obviously not, for Abraham preceded the tribe of Judah by 3 generations. Abraham was a Semite (a descendant of Shem ‑‑ a son of Noah), and he was also a Hebrew (a descendant of Heber, or Eber). But to say that Abraham was a Judahite is to say the he descended from his own great‑grandson! That is impossible. The descendants of Judah (Hebrew, Yehudah) were known as Yehudim, which means "Judahites." The New Testament, written in Greek, uses the term Ioudaioi, which is best translated "Judeans."
It is somewhat confusing that almost all Bible translations employ the word "Jew" instead of Judahite of Judean. But once we learn to read Judahite or Judean, the distinctions in the Bible between Hebrews, Israelites, and "Jews" is clarified. But let us concentrate for now upon the various meanings of the Biblical term "Judahite." The Bible uses the word "Judahite" in three distinct ways:
� 1). One who is of the tribe of Judah in the racial sense;
� 2). One who is a citizen of the Southern Nation of Judah, including the tribes of Benjamin and Live; it may even include Canaanites and Edomites who are citizens of Judah;
� 3). One who is a follower of the religion of Judah as given by Moses and the Prophets. This usage is found in Esther 8:17 and Romans 2:28‑29.
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Edomite Connection
The nation of Judah, comprising of a portion of the Israelite Tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi, were conquered and deported to Babylon 600 years before Christ. After a 70‑year captivity, 50,000 of them returned to rebuild Jerusalem, Ezra and Nehemiah both had a difficult time keeping them from intermarrying with the heathen who had settled in Palestine during their absence. They often had to institute reforms to cleanse the people, even the priests from these unlawful marriage relationships [168].
About a century and a half later, when Alexander the Great conquered the known world and set up his Greek Empire, the Greek language began to become the dominant language of the world. It was not long before the Hebrew term Yehudah ("Judahite") was replaced by the Greek term Ioudaioi ("Judeans"). This is why the New Testament (written in Greek) speaks of Judeans instead of Judahites. However, both terms have roughly the same meaning.
Between the time of Nehemiah and the birth of Christ, the problem of intermarrage increased. The climax of the problem came about a century and a half before the birth of Christ, when the Judean, John Hyrcanus, conquered the heathen cities in Palestine and forced the Canaanites to become Judeans ("Jews").
Josephus, the Judean historian, writing in about 95 A.D. wrote of this:
"Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea (Greek form of Edom), and subdued all the Idumaeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would be circumcised, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, they were hereafter no other than Judeans." [169]
A footnote in Josephus quotes Ammonius, an ancient grammarian, who says further:
"The Judeans are such by nature, and from the beginning, whilst the Idumaeans were not Judeans from the beginning, but Phoenicians and Syrians; but being afterward subdued by the Judeans and compelled to be circumcised, and to unite into one nation, and be subject to the same laws, they were called Judeans."
This same footnote also quotes Dio, the ancient historian:
"That country is also called Judea, and the people Judeans; and this name is given also to as many as embrace their religion, though of other nations."
Josephus continues his history of how the Judahites incorporated the Edomites and Canaanites and a history of the son of Hyrcanus named Aristobulus:
"He was called a lover of the Grecians; and had conferred many benefits on his own country, and made war against Iturea, and added a great part of it to Judea, and compelled its inhabitants if they would continue in that country, to be circumcised, and to live according to the Judean laws [170]. Now at this time the Judeans were in possession of the following cities that had belonged to the Syrians, and Idumeans, and Phoenicians: (Here he lists 23 non‑Israelite cities); which last (city) they utterly destroyed, because its inhabitants would not bear to change their religious rites for those peculiar to the Judeans. The Judeans also possessed others of the principle cities of Syria, which had been destroyed." [171]
This all took place at least a century before Christ. It is obvious, then, that by the time Christ was born a great host of the people living in Judea were Canaanites and Edomites by race, although they were Jews by religion and Judeans by citizenship. Even the ruling dynasty of the Herods were Edomites. Josephus speaks of:
"Herod, who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, i.e., a half‑Judean" [172]
A footnote here says:
"Accordingly, Josephus always esteems him an Idumean, though he says his father Antipater was of the same people with the Judeans, and a Judean by birth, as indeed all such proselytes of justice as the Idumeans, were in time esteemed the very same people with the Judeans."
The Esau‑Edomite nation ("Idumea") ceased to exist as a separate nation at this point in history. And yet the Bible is clear that Edom would be the enemy of Israel in the latter days. How could these prophecies be fulfilled, if there are no Edomites left in the world? There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction.
The Jews have thus adopted the materialistic and anti‑Christ attitude that characterized the father of the Edomites, Esau. As judgment for their sins, including that of the Crucifixion of Christ, God cast them out of Palestine in 70 A.D. whereupon they fled to North Africa and Spain. We find what happened to them in The American People's Encyclopedia for 1954, page 15‑492, under "The Jews."
"Following their dispersal many spread across North Africa to Spain and during this movement converted many of the Berber tribes to Judaism. This had little effect on physical type, since most of the Berbers were likewise of that Mediterranean Race. That portion which moved into Spain and later northward achieved considerable wealth and prestige and became known as Sephardin Jews."
There are two main racial branches of modern Jewry: the Sephardic Jews of Western Europe and the Ashkenazi Jews of Eastern Europe. Thus far we have dealt only with the Sephardic Jews, and in conclusion we may say that according to historians the Sephardic branch of modern Jewry is a mixture of Judean blood with that of Edom, Syria, Canaan, Phoenicia and North Africa (The Negro Races).
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ Gog and Magog in Modern Jewry
As Arthur Koestler pointed out earlier, Togarmah was a nephew of Magog. Here the plot begins to thicken, for most students of Bible prophecy will immediately recognize that name from reading Ezekiel 38 & 39. In these passages Togarmah, Magog, Meshech, and Tubal are all mentioned in connection with the great end‑time invasion of the land of Israel. They are pictured as INVADERS, NOT AS ISRAELITES. The identification of the Jewish Khazars with Gog and Magog is very old, Koestler writes:
"At some date earlier than 864, the Westphalian Monk Christian Druthmar of Aquitania wrote a Latin trestise 'Expositio in Evangelium Mattei,' in which he reports that 'there existed people under the sky in regions where no Christians can be found, whose name is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one, called the Gazari (Khazars) who are circumcised and observe Judaism in its entirety.' This remark occurs a propos of Matthew 24:14 which has no apparent bearing on it and no more is heard of the subject." [173]
Koestler continues with the story of ibn Fadlan, an Arab traveller who visited Gazaris (the Khazars) in 922 A.D. concluding his account of his travels with these words:
"The Khazars and their king are all Jews. The Bulgars and all their neighbors are subject to him. They treat him with worshipful obedience. Some are of the opinion that Gog and Magog are the Khazars." [174]
There is also evidence of an Edomite connection with the Khazars. The Jewish Encyclopedia, in commenting on the letter which Hasdai ibn Shaprut wrote to King Joseph, says:
"In this letter Hasdai speaks of the tradition according to which the Chazars (Khazars) once dwelt near the Seir (Serir) mountains."
The Bible identifies the Edomites as having lived in Mount Seir in Genesis 36:8:
"Thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir: Esau is Edom."
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ The Communist Connection
"Edom" literally means Red, and it is certainly no coincidence that the major theorists and financiers of World Communism have been Jews. That they should pick red as the color of their Edomite Banner is quite fitting. However, this color was associated with the Khazars many centuries earlier:
"The legends which circulated among Western Jews in the Middle Ages provide a curious parallel to the Russian Bylinda. To quote Poliak again: 'The popular Jewish legend does not remember a Khazar Kingdom but a Kingdom of the Red Jews.'" [175]
When the Khazar Empire was finally destroyed by the Russians from the north, the Khazar‑Jews began to disperse into what is now called Poland and Germany, as well as into other Eastern European lands. However, they continued to multiply and remained the most populous branch of World Jewry.
The destruction of the Khazar Empire brought many Khazars into contact with their fellow Jews of the Sephardim. Together, they continued their anti‑Christian activities, mainly through their practice of usury, until finally the Christian Nations of Europe began to banish them. And as they left their usurious monetary practices left with them, and the European Renaissance began. The so‑called Dark Ages lifted. Koestler quotes Cecil Roth, a another Jewish Historian:
"In a sense, the Jewish dark ages may be said to begin with the Renaissance." [176]
Thus it can be seen clearly, God blessed the Christian Nations when they expelled His Enemies of Edom, Gog, and Magog. But the tide changed when these Khazar‑Jews of Gog and Magog finally succeeded in overthrowing the Russians in what became known as the Communist Revolution‑Bolshevik Revolution of Russia in 1917, and with the slaughter of literally millions of Christian Russian People. This revolution was carried out with the monetary backing of the Jewish banking houses in Western Europe and America.
Thus, the rise of Togarmah, Ashkenaz, Gog, Magog, Meschech (ancient name for Moscow which also sit on Seven Hills), Gomer and Tubal (ancient name for Tobolsk) as prophesied in Ezekiel 38 and 39, is none other than the rise of the Bolshevik Khazar‑Jews of Eastern Europe.
Prophecy is unfolding before our very eyes, but as long as the True Racial Origin of the Jews Remains hidden from Christians, few will understand how it is being fulfilled.
The Soviet Khazar‑Jews of Gog, Magog and Togarmah have already invaded Palestine and stolen it from the Arabs as Ezekiel prophesied. The Arabs know the origin of the vast majority of the Jews entering Palestine today, find it difficult to understand why Americans would support such an invasion. The Khazars were the traditional enemies of the Arabs during the Middle Ages, and so they recognize the true nature of the invasion.
The Khazar‑Jews who control the Soviet Government have tried to cover their historic tracks in order to prevent the Christians in the West from dropping their support for Jewish Zionism. They know that without such support from the Christians, their entire venture would be jeopardized. Thus, Arthur Koestler states:
"It is sad to report in this context that more than a thousand years after the events under discussion, the Soviet regime has done its best to expunge the memory of the Khazars' historic role and cultural achievements." [177]
��������������������������������������������������������������������������� Bolshevism-Judaism-Communism-Zionism
Bolshevism is an alien concept imposed upon the Russian people from the outside. It was never an indigenous Russian movement, but clearly an anti‑Christian Eastern Byzantine system. Its tenants as set out by the Jew, Adam Weisaupt, professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, Bavaria.
The Odessa and Syrian Jews were responsible both for Bolshevism (Judaism) and dogmatic Zionism (Talmudism)...The Marshall Plan, looted, as we know, many shipments of foodstuffs, goods and weapons, and diverted them to the Haganah and Stern Gangs which were operating in Palestine, under the Command of the Jew, General Julius Klein. In any case, The Marshall Plan was designed to obstruct, not promote, the recovery of Jewry's most hated enemy, Germany, just as it was General Marshall who put the Communist Mass Murderer, Mao Tse Tung in power in China.
Thus from the very beginning, Bolshevism was a Jewish thing, written by Jews, implemented by Jews, and
largely financed by Jews and their surrogates. Secondly, all of the Czars were well‑schooled in the
Revolutionary-Avaricious-born-exploiters-ingrained-nature of the Jews! With this in mind the Czars enacted a set
of laws and rules to protect the indigenous Russian political, economic, religious and cultural life, from the
despoilers.
From 1772 all Jews were confined inside the "Pale." They were free to do what they liked inside the Pales, but were forbidden to travel or trade beyond them. In other words, they were not allowed to prey on the non‑Jewish inhabitants as is their custom, since time immemorial. Here began the first sproutings of Bolshevism‑Judaism‑Communism‑Zionism, as the hybrid "language" of Yiddish was born. Thirdly, since Russia, which was a Christian Nation at that time, was the first to impose such hated restrictions upon Jewry, it was only natural; given the well‑known Jewish characteristic of lust for vengeance to topple Russia first.
Therefore, to hide their guilt, they intensified the propaganda to promote the false doctrine that "The Jews Were God's Chosen People." So much so that, millions of Christian people have been taught this damnable lie, this Satanic falsehood by the clergy of the Christian Nations of the West, until multiplied millions of people have given the International Esau‑Edomite‑Canaanite‑Khazar Jew, special treatment as the "Chosen of God" and a people who can do no wrong. With the Chosen People status afforded them by Organized Religion, which they carefully subverted with traitorous agents in the seminaries, they are hidden from their Red Dragon Identity, as The Children of Satan, and activities in this nation and the world.
Furthermore, the Jews and Organized Religion have coined a dirty phrase to hang onto anyone who dares to expose their evil works. This phrase of words are called "anti‑Semitism." It is a weapon the Jews use freely. But the question remains; how can one be "anti‑Semitic" when he is more Semitic than most Jews?
The battle between Christianity and the Jews has been going on long before the physical birth of Jesus Christ. The war has been going on since early Biblical days and continues to the present. St. Eusebius of Caesarea made a distinction, "between Hebrews who were good men in the Old Testament and the Jews who were evil."
St. Bernard said:
"...The Jews are murderers, a race who had not God for their father, but the devil, and are murderers as he was a murderer from the beginning." [178]
Bishop Agobard:
"...the latter (Bishop Agobard) forbade the Christians to have any connections with Jews, because it was unworthy of the sons of light to contaminate themselves by associating with the children of darkness; it was unworthy too, of the impeccant and spotless Church, which must prepare for the heavenly bridegroom, to dishonor itself by any connection with the polluted, shrivelled and repudiated Synagogue." [179]
St. Hillary of Poitiers did not acknowledge a Jew's greeting in the street.
"He believed that before the Jews received the law they were possessed by an unclean devil, who immediately returned after their rejection of Christ." [180]
St. Jerome:
"I detest the Jews with an unutterable hatred because even to this day they are cursing our Lord in their Synagogues." [181]
St. Gregory of Nyssa:
"...Jews are the slayers of the Lord, murderers of the prophets, adversaries of God, haters of God, men who show contempt for the law, foes of grace....advocates of the devil; brood of vipers, slanderers, scoffers, men whose minds are in darkness, leaven of the Pharisees, assembly of demons, sinners, wicked men, stoners and haters of righteousness." [182]
St. Ambrose:
"I declare that I set fire to the Synagogue, or at least that I ordered those who did it, that there might be no place where Christ was denied. If it be objected that I did not set the Synagogue on fire here, I answer that it began to be burnt by the judgment of God." [183]
The false belief that the Jews are "just like us but a different religion" is the cause of much of our misfortune today. St. Bernard knew the Jews were Not just like us when he said:
"The wickedness of the Jews consists not in their conduct, but in their Jewishness." [184]
By 1492 the Jews had become so powerful that so‑called Christian Jews, or Marranos were in control of many key positions in Spain. Even today the Jews hate Queen Isabella of Spain because she had the Inquisition carry out the limpieza de sangre laws which made all Christian church leaders and those in the aristocracy prove with genealogies that they were of pure Spanish blood and had no racial mixture with the Jews.
Pope Honorius III realized that mixing with the Jews was a crime against nature and,
"...it has been decided that the difference in clothes the Jews of all lands should be distinguished from the Christians, lest they sinfully mingle with the women of the other...the Jews of your diocese do not observe this; with the result that under the veil of error this damnable intermingling be committed, we by Aposostolic Letters, order Your Fraternity to compel the Jews by means of punishment fixed against them at the General Council, without appeal, to wear clothes by which they may be distinguishable from Christians." [185]
Gregory IX:
"...Since we desire that the Jews be recognizable and distinguished from the Christians, we order you to impose upon each and every Jew of both sexes a sign; one round patch of yellow cloth or linen, to be worn on the uppermost garment, stitched over the heart and behind it, in order that they may be recognized." [186]
As the Jews are claiming "Chosen People" status, then who in the world are all of these Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic, Germanic and Kindred people God has been calling out of all the nations where He has scattered them; and is regathering them in America?� Are we just "Gentiles" (non‑Jews) as we have been brainwashed into believing? No wonder the doctrine of America revealed as modern day Israel is heralded from the housetops of every organized church as false doctrine.
Due to the tremendous amount of false teachings that have been done in regards to the Jews, perhaps it would not be inappropriate here to present a brief review of the history of the House of Israel, the House of Judah and the Jews, as related in the Scriptures. From this point on it will be almost impossible to keep from repeating ourself from time to time. So we respectfully request that you take into consideration, that fact, and realize that this is because the three peoples are so intertwined in history that the threads must cross time and time again as we go along.
The Jews have thus adopted the materialistic and anti‑Christ attitude that characterized the father of the Edomites, Esau. As judgment for their sins, including that of the Crucifixion of Christ, God cast them out of Palestine in 70 A.D. whereupon they fled to North Africa and Spain. They are constantly spewing out their propaganda of how they are being picked on and persecuted by everyone. Anti‑Semitism is their pet cry and the mask behind which they hide. They continually spell out how Christians MUST help the Jews; and if they do not then they are really not Christians after all. They send out literally tons of literature that tells how we can, and must, funnel our money, efforts, time, energies, influence and personal work as individual Christians and Churches into Specific Jewish Programs, on how we as Christians Must buy merchandise offered by Jews, patronize Jewish businesses, to lobby the American Government to aid the Jews (to the tune of about 10‑12 Billion per year in money and military hardware) and stop aid to those who oppose them or hinder their plans for world conquest. The dragon, or World Jewery, who created the Beast of (Revelation 16:13) which is World Communism, and has been a very handy tool in the hands of the dragon (also known as Zionism or Judaism).
One might compare this with:
"For this city hath been to me as a provocation of mine anger and of my fury from the day that they built it even unto this day; that I should remove it from before my face, Because of all the evil of the children of Israel and of the children of Judah, which they have done to provoke me to anger, they, their kings, their princes, their priests, and their prophets, and the men of Judah, and The Inhabitants of Jerusalem." [187]
Now if the inhabitants of Jerusalem were just some of the men of Judah, there would be no point in making the distinction here. Remember, the prophet Ezekiel was with the group who had been deported to Babylon. Jeremiah was never taken there, although the statement has been made many times by those who tried to put Jeremiah in Babylon, although the Bible, if they ever read it, would tell them the exact opposite.
Jeremiah sent a letter to those Already in Babylon, telling them both sides of this prophecy: he said,
"For this saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Let not your prophets and your diviners, that be in the midst of you, neither hearken to your dreams which ye cause to be dreamed. For they prophesy falsely unto you in my name: I have not sent them, saith the Lord. For thus saith the Lord, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word toward you, in causing you to return to this place. For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the Lord, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. Then shall ye call upon me, and ye shall go and pray unto me, and I will hearken unto you. And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart. And I will be found of you, saith the Lord: and I will turn away your captivity, and I will gather you from all the nations, and from all the places whither I have driven you, saith the Lord; and I will bring you again into the place whence I caused you to be carried away captive. Because ye have said, The Lord hath raised us up prophets in Babylon; Know that thus saith the Lord of the king that sitteth upon the throne of David, and of all the people that dwelleth in this city, and of your brethren that are not gone forth with you into captivity; Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Behold, I will send upon them the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, and will make them like vile figs, that cannot be eaten, they are so evil. And I will persecute them with the sword, with the famine, and with the pestilence, and will deliver them to be removed to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, and an astonishment, and an hissing, and a reproach, among all the nations whither I have driven them: Because they have not hearkened to my words, saith the Lord, which I sent unto them by my servants the prophets, rising up early and sending them; but ye (Jews) would not hear, saith the Lord." [188]
Again we have two groups presented here. Part of the nation of Judah had gone into captivity already at Babylon, part of the nation of Judah remained still, in and around Jerusalem, and then of course they had the Jews among them in Jerusalem. Just as the Jews congregate in our big cities, New York, Los Angeles, Washington, and that sort of thing today, so did they in that day.
Here we are presented with clear prophecies by Jeremiah, that even those not yet deported to Babylon were going to be, and yet somehow they wouldn't believe. There had been the one Babylonian conquest and deportation, and they wouldn't believe that there was coming another. Now why? Well, they wouldn't hear Jeremiah for several reasons.� One of course is the natural dislike of bad news by evil men, and second was the supposed contradiction of Jeremiah by Ezekiel. Now Jeremiah had warned that this last king of Judah, Zedekiah, was going to be captured and taken to Babylon.
Jeremiah 34:2‑5, says:
"Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel; Go and speak to Zedekiah king of Judah, and tell him, Thus saith the Lord; Behold, I will give this city into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall burn it with fire: And thou shalt not escape out of his hand, but shalt surely be taken, and delivered into his hand; and thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the king of Babylon, and he shall speak with thee mouth to mouth, and thou shalt go to Babylon. Yet hear the word of the Lord, O Zedekiah king of Judah; Thus saith the Lord of thee, Thou shalt not die by the sword: But thou shalt die in peace: and with the burnings of thy fathers, the former kings which were before thee, so shall they burn odours for thee; and they will lament thee, saying, Ah lord! for I have pronounced the word, saith the Lord."
Jeremiah told Zedekiah, he would be captured; he would be taken to Babylon; he would talk face to face with King Nebuchadnezzar, but he wasn't going to be put to death; instead he would die in peace.
In Babylon, Ezekiel said to Jerusalem:
"Say thou unto them, Thus saith the Lord God; This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem, and all the House of Israel that are among them. Say, I am your sign: like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity. And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight, and shall go forth: they shall dig through the wall to carry out thereby: he shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes. My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there. And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them." [189]
You know how it is today: you can attend any church of Organized Religion and the preacher will take one verse, or sometimes just a phrase out of one verse, as his subject for his sermon of the day; that is his point of departure from the Bible, not to return to it. So in those days they were doing the same thing. Ezekiel said that Zedekiah should not see Babylon, so they said, "Well, that means he is not going to be deported there, and therefore the rest of us will not be."
However, both of these prophecies were fulfilled in great detail. As we see from the following:
"In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they besieged it. And in the eleventh year of Zedekiah, in the fourth month, the ninth day of the month, the city (Jerusalem) was broken up. And all the princes of the king of Babylon came in, and sat in the middle gate...And it came to pass, that when Zedekiah the king of Judah saw them, and all the men of war, then they fled, and went forth out of the city by night, by the way of the king's garden, by the gate betwixt the two walls: and he went out the way of the plain. But the Chaldeans' army pursued after them, and over took Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho: and when they had taken him, they brought him up to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon to Riblah in the land of Hamath, where he gave judgment upon him. Then the king of Babylon slew the sons of Zedekiah in Riblah before his eyes: also the king of Babylon slew all the nobles of Judah. Moreover he put out Zedekiah's eyes, and bound him with chains, to carry him to Babylon. And the Chaldeans burned the king's house, and the houses of the people, with fire, and brake down the walls of Jerusalem." [190]
Josephus also records in some detail of the great accuracy of this prophecy. The city was taken about midnight, and Zedekiah with his family and a few retainers fled. The king could not go out any of the regular gates of the city, because these were all guarded by the besieging army. So they escaped out of the one little gate that had been overlooked, and they were probably disguised. But when the pursuers came into sight near Jericho, all those around the king scattered and fled, leaving Zedekiah and his family alone, to await capture.
In keeping with the prophecy, Zedekiah was taken to Babylon alive; he was kept there a prisoner until he finally died of natural causes. He was not killed, but he went to Babylon, and he never saw it. So we can clearly see that this is an instance of the extreme accuracy of Bible prophecy.
We know that on that second conquest of Jerusalem, not only Zedekiah, but probably most of the survivors were also taken to Babylon. It said there were left only some of the poorest sort of people of the land; which does not mean poor in the financial sense, but poor in the sort of people they were. In other words only the dregs of society remained in Jerusalem.
Thus, we have here two kinds of figs: the good figs, and the bad figs. But, how are we going to sort them out? Who were the good figs? Remember Jeremiah 24:5 said they were among the Judahites who were taken into captivity into the land of Babylon, the land of the Chaldeans. We know that substantially the whole remaining nation of Judah was taken into the Babylonian captivity; we know that after the seventy years, when Babylon was conquered by the Medes and Persians (No doubt many of the military and officers were Israelites who had been taken captive by the Assyrians and transported in to the cities of the Medes.
"In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and In The Cities of The Medes." [191]
This is recorded a second time, for a witness:
"And the king of Assyria did carry away Israel unto Assyria, and put them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and In The Cities of The Medes." [192]
We know that a substantial number of the nation of Judah was taken in the Assyrian captivity also.
"Now in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah did Sennacherib king of Assyria come up against all the fenced cities of Judah, and took them." [193]
Thus the remaining nation of Judah, except for the poor:
"Now when all the captains of the forces which were in the fields, even they and their men, heard that the king of Babylon had made Gedaliah the son of Ahikam governor in the land, and had committed unto him men, and women, and children, and of The Poor of The Land, of them that were not carried away captive to Babylon." [194]
Then after Babylon was conquered by the Medes and Persians, a remnant returned to Jerusalem, as the books of Ezra and Nehemiah record. Were these the good figs, those who returned to Palestine after the seventy years captivity? It would appear not; there are too many indications against it.
God had said:
"And I will be found of you, saith the Lord: and I will turn away your captivity, and I will gather you from all the nations, and from all the places whither I have driven you, saith the Lord; and I will bring you again into the place whence I caused you to be carried away captive." [195]
But, Babylon was not a lot of nations; it was only one nation and, in general one place, one territorial area. So those who returned with Nehemiah and Ezra had not been scattered; they were only in Babylon. Then Jeremiah, says of those who were the good figs:
"For I will set mine eyes upon them for good...and I will plant them, and not pluck them up." [196]
Now that doesn't fit those who came back to Jerusalem, because they came back for a few centuries of continuous trouble. Jeremiah goes on to say of the good figs:
"And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am the Lord: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart."
Remember, those who returned to Jerusalem, with the exception of a tiny little minority among them, came back bringing with them the Babylonian Talmud, the "tradition of the elders" as they called it in Jesus Christ's day; they refused to receive Christ; and they refused His message. It is related that:
"...He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him." [197]
Again,
"And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape. And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not." [198]
And,
"But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you...if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive." [199]
And,
"...Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me." [200]
Again,
"Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also." [201]
Then,
"...it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God: Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying." [202]
They had to go to Babylon, and what happened to them there? We know that it was a large nation which was captured, and we know that about 50,000 came back, of whom slightly over 8,000 were not of any tribe of Israel whatsoever. So those who came back from Babylon were only some 34,000. What happened to the rest?
Jeremiah himself told us what was going to happen to the rest, the good figs.
"The word that the Lord spake against Babylon and against the lad of the Chaldeans by Jeremiah the prophet. Declare ye among the nations, and publish, and set up a standard; publish, and conceal not: say, Babylon is taken, Bel is confounded, Merodach is broken in pieces; her idols are confounded, her images are broken in pieces. For out of the north there cometh up a nation against her, which shall make her land desolate, and none shall dwell therein: they shall remove, they shall depart, both man and beast. In those days, and in that time, saith the Lord, the children of Israel shall come, they and the children of Judah together, going and weeping: they shall go, and seek the Lord their God. They Shall Ask The Way to Zion with their faces thitherward, saying, Come, and let us join ourselves to the Lord in a perpetual covenant that shall not be forgotten." [203]
Now you hear some people, who profess to know something of the Israel message, quoting this verse as though it were something to happen in the future. But, we must remember that Jeremiah has been talking specifically about the fall of Babylon, and said: "...in Those Days, and in That Time, saith the Lord, the children of Israel shall come."
Well, we know of course that the ten‑tribed northern kingdom of Israel, together with a considerable portion of the people of Judah and Benjamin, were deported by the Assyrians, and settled in an arc around the southern end of the Caspian Sea, where they became known as the Scythians.
In 612 B.C., the nation of the Assyrians was broken up; their capital, Nineveh, was captured and destroyed; and the people that captured and destroyed it were an alliance of three: there were Scythians, in other words, the people of Israel destroying their Assyrian conquerors; and the Medes; and the Babylonians. They had formed that alliance against the Assyrians, and as such the Scythians were a very formidable military people; we always have been a formidable military people, throughout the history of our people.
Then, later the Medo‑Persian army came down and took Babylon, some of the ancient historians record that the Scythians swooped down into Babylonia, at that time, and gathered up most of the deported Judahites and Benjaminites. They took them back with them; in other words, they were about ready to start their march northward into Europe, and they would not leave the people of Judah and Benjamin behind, so they took their brethren with them. Thus, fulfilling the words of Jeremiah, when he said:
"...in Those Days, and in That Time, saith the Lord, the children of Israel shall come, they and the children of Judah (Which would include Benjamin and the half tribe of Levi)Together, going and weeping: they shall go, and seek the Lord their God."
In the Aprocrypha it is recorded that Esdras had been given a vision and the angel speaking to him refers to that:
"And whereas thou sawest that he gathered another peaceable multitude unto him; those are the ten tribes, which were carried away prisoners out of their own land in the time of Osea the king, whom Salmasasar the king of Assyria led away captive, and he carried them over the waters, and so came they into another land. But they took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth Into a Further Country, Where Never Mankind Dwelt, that they might there keep their statutes, which they had never kept in their own land. And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow passages of the river...For through that country There Was A Great Way to Go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. Then dwelt they there until the latter time." [204]
We know of course they went around the eastern end of the Black Sea. Some of them went through the mountainous region lying between the Caspian and Black Sea, the Caucasus Mountains, and because they came out of the Caucasus Mountains on their march into Europe, you note that many historians have called those people Caucasians; but they never ask, Who were they before they went through the Caucasus Mountains?
Some others, of course, went around the easterly side of the Caspian Sea, and after they came to the north end of it, turned west and joined the other migration, and we know that they followed up the Danube Valley, for the major portion of their migration. This Arsareth was a northern tributary of the Danube river in modern Rumania, still bears the name Sareth. Now that is one of the places that they would have passed in their migration, so even the name of it was given.
Now remember, of the good figs God had said He would plant them and not pull them down. We can see, even today, how God has prospered our people, the White Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and Kindred nations of Europe. But as to those who claim that heritage, falsely, the Edomite and Khazarian Jews who are occupying Palestine today, look what the first chapter of Malachi says of them:
"The burden of the word of the Lord to Israel by Malachi. I have loved you, saith the Lord. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob, And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. Whereas Edom (The Jews) saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the Lord of hosts, They (The Jews)Shall Build (Build up Jerusalem and Palestine), but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever." [205]
Ezekiel related the following:
"Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and All The House of Israel Wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem (The Jews) have said, Get You (Israelites)Far From The Lord: Unto Us (Jews)Is This Land (Palestine and Jerusalem)Given in Possession." [206]
He then told our Israel people:
"Thus saith the Lord God; Because the enemy (The Jews) hath said against you, Aha, Even The Ancient High Places Are Our's In Possession...Therefore, ye mountins (Nations) of Israel, hear the word of the Lord God...Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea (The Jews)Which Have Appointed My Land (Palestine and Jerusalem)Into Their Possession wiht the Joy of all Their Heart, with Despiteful Minds, to cast it out for a prey." [207]
Now what about the people of Judah who came back to Jerusalem after the seventy years of the Babylon
captivity? Daniel relates:
"Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy." [208]
Well, when it came to the murder of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, that certainly was finishing the transgression; and little could be added after that. They came back for an evil destiny in itself, save for a little handful of them. Think about it, there were only about 5,000, or a little more, who were the converts in Christ's own time; and the rest were obviously riff‑raff of the basest sort.
Now those who came back to Jerusalem certainly didn't go and see Jesus Christ as Jeremiah related:
"In those days, and in that time, saith the Lord, the children of Israel shall come, they and the children of Judah together, going and weeping: they shall go, and seek the Lord their God." [209]
There were two baskets of figs: one good and one rotten. Today in our land we have a people who claim American citizenship Along with their Israeli passport; they are here in our country, they vote in our elections when it is convenient to them; they claim to be Americans: But are they really? Upon examination, we find it is the same old thing.
As Isaiah relates:
"...Jerusalem is ruined, and Judah is fallen: because their tongue and their doings are against the Lord, to provoke the eyes of his glory. The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves." [210]
There is a long series of Bible prophecies concerning Assyria; not Assyria as it existed in Bible times, but what it was going to do in our own day; and you will find that those prophecies coincide exactly with the prophecies about Russia in the thirty‑eighth and thirty‑ninth chapters of Ezekiel.
We know a lot of the surviving Assyrians fled northeast from their old kingdom into what is today known as southwestern Russia: Georgia and the Ukraine. We know that there was a heavy Jewish population there, and we know of course that the Jews are the complete masters of Russia today.
Russia is also the birthplace of the Khazar Jews whose descendents make up about 90-95 percent of the Jewish population of the world today. Thus we can see that the identical prophecies, that the Assyrians were going to do this, and that, the Russians are doing today. But we are getting off track so lets continue. When the Assyrians captured the people of Israel, the ten‑tribed northern kingdom and a large portion of the kingdom of Judah, and deported them, they were not about to let them settle down an build for themselves a large number of fortresses; they kept them a nomadic, agricultural, shepherd and cattle raising people.
Contemporary history records that these Scythians made a raid clear down into Palestine. In fact, they reached the borders of Egypt before they were turned back, and they left a settlement in the Jordan Valley which was called Scythopolis, which was named after them.
But it was against God's plan for them, to return and stay in Palestine, so He allowed the combined forces to push them on up into their eventual European homelands.
"Therefore, behold, I will hedge up thy way with thorns, and make a wall, that she (Israel) shall not find her paths (Israel was not to return to Palestine)...she shall follow after her lovers (False gods), but she shall not overtake them; and she shall seek them, but shall not find them (Israel has looked for her false gods for many centuries but God says)Then shall she say, I Will Go and Return to my First Husband: For then was it Better With Me Than Now." [211]
The Medes and Persians, while they had received the help of the Scythians in destroying Babylon, they were ungrateful. Every king in those days felt his first order of business was to conquer as many of his enemies as he could, and the Medo‑Persian armies turned against the Scythians.
One of them was turned back with a frightful defeat and slaughter, but they gathered another one, and went out again against the Scythians, and these were primarily the ones on the western side of the Caspian Sea. These Scythians retreated before them, finally into the Caucasus Mountains, where there is a great pass; which has from that time until our own day, has borne the name, The Pass of Israel.
The Jewish Communist Government in Russia may have changed the name, since they came into power, but, until then at least, it was known as The Pass of Israel; and it is the route of the Georgian Military road. This mountain pass came to a point where the mountains on both sides were so steep, that fighting along that surface was impossible.
There is just a narrow, little bit of level ground at the edge of a river, because the river covered most of the bottom of this gorge, and here and there are places where great rocks barred the passageway and a few men could have defended it against an army of a million men, because only three or four at a time could pass. It was there the army of Darius finally gave up and turned back, as further pursuit was hopeless; and the place was named the Dariel Gorge, and has also borne that name down through the centuries to our present time.
Remember, God was going to gather the good figs out of the many nations where He had scattered them, Well, now we know what happened to these Scythians: we know that while they were still in Scythia, two of the tribes were even then known as the Angles and the Saxons. We know the name of many of the others. They were called Getae, for a period of time.
As time passed it became slurred and changed until finally became Goth. The Angles and Saxons historians have no difficulty in tracing, because the tribes of the Jutes, Angles, and Saxons settled in Northwestern Germany, along the border of the country, now known as Denmark. By the time the Goths were moving up through the Danube Valley, they were starting to be pushed westward by the great flood of mounted nomad warriors from Asia, under Attila the Hun.
First, the Visigoths turned west; they were coming into the Roman empire then, and the Romans sent out an army which the Visigoths almost exterminated. So, the Romans gave them some land on the western side of the Danube river, to settle on, provided they would stay there. Where they were supposed to be peaceful settlers and give up their arms, and so; of course, as they did that, the Romans started oppressing them, and besides, there was also pressure coming from the east. This disarming of our Race is even now being attempted today, and if successful, it will end with the same result, our people becoming oppressed by the enemy. Who we believe to be the same enemies of ancient times; The Jews.
So the Visigoths went on the march again. They went around the north end of the Adriatic Sea, then down into Northern Italy. Where in 408 A.D., they were threatening to capture the city of Rome. However, by that time, Rome had gone the way America is beginning to go at the present time. In the days of Rome's greatness, it was the Roman citizens themselves who made up the Roman Army, a well trained powerful army. But by now the Romans had grown soft, off the plunder of the other nations, and the Romans just couldn't be bothered with military service.
So they were hiring mercenary soldiers to defend them, soldiers who fought, not because it was their country or the patriotic thing to do, but just because they were getting paid wages for it. Just as the negroes are doing today. For the most part, they are not loyal to America, they are just serving in the army because it is easy and the pay is good. Remember the present furor, "We should not have a draft anymore, just have a mercenary professional army."
The Romans saw they could not withstand this force of the Visigoths; so they bought them off, paying a very heavy ransom, tribute, and in that same year, 408 A.D., they pulled the last of the Roman legions out of Britain and brought them back to Rome in an effort to try and defend the city.
In 410 A.D., the Visigoths resumed their attack upon Rome; captured it, and looted it. In fact, they had captured and plundered the whole northern half of Italy. Soon thereafter, in 412 A.D., the Visgoths, finding nothing left worth taking, pulled out. They then marched through Southern France, where a few of them settled; but the bulk crossed the Pyrenees and settled in Spain. And from the time they got there, somewhere between 415 and 420 A.D., they were the dominant ruling people in Spain until the Moorish conquest in 711 A.D.
When the Moors came into Spain, attacking from the south, the Visgoths fought a rearguard battle as far as they could, but they were driven up into Northern Spain, and there today you will find tow completely different racial types in Spain. A dark Latin type, and a blue‑eyed blond type, who are the pure descendants of the old Visigoths.
About fifty years after the Visigoths came through, the other Gothic tribe, the Ostrogoths, came along the same route. Part of these Ostrogoths had gone up the Danube River, clear up to the shores of the Baltic Sea where they had settled in what became known as East Prussia, and is now under communist rule. But the rest of the Ostrogoths, or Eastern Goths, came down into Italy, again captured and looted Rome, and they set themselves up a Gothic Kingdom in Northern Italy that lasted, as an independent kingdom, about twenty‑five years.
They were then overthrown politically, but their people remained there, and it can be seen two distinctly different racial stocks. In the extreme southern part of Italy and in Sicily you have one type; in Northern Italy there is another type who are obviously of our own racial stock. They are the descendants of the Ostrogoths. Portions of them got into Austria and up into Switzerland, and again even in Switzerland there is not a pure race, but different racial types, part of whom are our people.
Not all of the Ostrogoths went all the way up into the Baltic regions; some of them settled in the Danube Valley, and you will find what are obviously our Israel people in Hungary and in Czechoslovakia; not a hundred percent, because that area has been a battle ground for the invasion of many different people who have left some of their racial stock behind. But you will find there, quite a number who are obviously our people; Germany of course in its entirety, and the Scandinavian countries.
Then, from the Jutes, Angles and Saxons (Germans), came the settlement of the British Isles after the withdrawal of the Roman legions. Some of these people, Armstrong and a few others, will try to tell you that England is going to have to be overthrown, as part of the collapse of the old Roman Empire, simply do not know their history.
There wasn't an Englishman in England at the time when the Romans were there. English history, as such, begins with the landing of the Jutes, Angles and Saxons, and by that time the Roman army had been gone for nearly a century. So, an Englishman is, quite simply, a German who went for a boat ride, and a German is an Englishman who stayed home; and yet we let the Jews promote constant warfare between them.
We must remember that God spoke in these passages we presented before, about the evil that had existed in the lands of Israel and Judah, provoking Him; and it did, because they had let themselves be corrupted by the Jews among them, exactly as we are today allowing ourselves to be corrupted by the Jews among us. Therefore, in punishment, we are having to go through disaster after disaster, just the same as those which fell upon our ancestors 2,500 years ago.
Therefore, in fulfillment of the prophecies of Jeremiah, our people were scattered among a number of nations. They fulfill in all respects the description of the good figs; and the others: well, some were left behind, even after the second Babylonian conquest and deportation; those went down into Egypt, taking the prophet Jeremiah with them. And, as Jeremiah told them, they weren't going to escape from the Babylonians by going to Egypt, because they would be under Babylonian rule even there, and would be slaughtered. History does record that the Babylonians conquered Egypt shortly after that.
Jeremiah, of course, did not stay there for that; he had been warned of what was coming, and left with the two princesses, the daughters of Zedekiah, and finally landing in Ireland with one of them; the other one had married a Milesian King in Spain. Those who remained in Palestine, those who went to Egypt, and most of those that came back to Palestine, were the bad figs; and the rest, who went on to become the Israelites of today, were the good figs. Thus we can clearly see: Whenever God makes a prophecy, He carries it out in complete detail, exactly as He said it.
After observing that Jeremiah devotes two entire chapters to making clear this vital distinction between Israel and Judah, How can anyone fancy that the Jews who are a very small fraction of mixed breeds of the Tribe of Judah, can possibly take the place of Israel?
�Another group that make up part of the English today, of course, are the Normans who came in under William the Conqueror in 1066 A.D., and those were not Latin French at all. History records that the Norse and Danish Vikings were a scourge of most of the known world for several centuries, at least along the coastlands of Europe. Viking ships sailed up the Tiber to attack the city of Rome. Of course Rome was so well fortified, and the Vikings did not have the equipment or the training for conducting a long siege, so they could not capture it. But they did capture the island of Sicily and there was a Norman kingdom there for several generations.
The Vikings harassed the coasts of France continually, and on three different occasions Vikings captured and looted the city of Paris. And finally one of the French Kings made a deal with one of the Viking Chieftains: He would give him the English Channel coastal province of Normandy, if the Vikings would settle there with their people, settle it thoroughly, and then act as a buffer against any further attacks; the agreement was made. Thus the people of Normandy, who came in with William the Conqueror were Norse Vikings.
However, before that time, the Vikings had likewise harassed the British Isles, including Ireland. They established settlements on the coasts of England, in addition to conducting a great deal of piratical raiding, and a large number of them settled in Ireland. The early Irish histories record that one could hardly find a village in Ireland that didn't have some of these Norse Vikings among them.
Therefore, in fulfillment of the prophecies of Jeremiah, our people were scattered among a number of nations. They fulfill in all respects the description of the good figs; and the others: well, some were left behind, even after the second Babylonian conquest and deportation; those went down into Egypt, taking the prophet Jeremiah with them. And, as Jeremiah told them, they weren't going to escape from the Babylonians by going to Egypt, because they would be under Babylonian rule even there, and would be slaughtered. History does record that the Babylonians conquered Egypt shortly after that.
Jeremiah, of course, did not stay there for that; he had been warned of what was coming, and left with the two princesses, the daughters of Zedekiah, and finally landing in Ireland with one of them; the other one had married a Milesian King in Spain. Those who remained in Palestine, those who went to Egypt, and most of those that came back to Palestine, were the bad figs; and the rest, who went on to become the Israelites of today, were the good figs. Thus we can clearly see: Whenever God makes a prophecy, He carries it out in complete detail, exactly as He said it.
���������������������������������������������������������������������������� Only The Inhabitants of Jerusalem Left
This event occurred early in the reign of Sennacherib, who came to the Assyrian throne in 705 B.C. It is evident that he carried away all the people of the Kingdom of Judah except those who were shut up within the walls of Jerusalem.
It was also, about this time that the Jews who were already in control of Jerusalem told the True Israelites to go far from them.
"Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and All the House of Israel Wholly are they unto whom The Inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the Lord [212]: Unto us is this land (Here they, the Jews are already claiming Jerusalem and Palestine as theirs. Just as they do in modern times) given in possession." [213]
Many will disagree with this statement because they think that the inhabitants of Jerusalem consisted of people from the Tribe of Judah. This is not true. The people of Judah never consisted of more than a mere percentage of the population of Jerusalem. The following Scriptures well bear this out:
"As for the Jebusites the Inhabitants of Jerusalem, the children of Judah could not drive them out: But the Jebusites Dwell with the Children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day." [214]; "Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah, and caused the Inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit fornication, and compelled Judah thereto." [215]; "Therefore thus saith the Lord God; As the vine tree among the trees of the forest, Which I have given to the Fire for fuel, So will I give the Inhabitants of Jerusalem." [216]
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ Fugitives Taken To Babylon
"In 581 B.C. the few remaining Jews in Palestine allied themselves with the Moabites and made a last wild stand for independence. A final defeat followed by a final exile brought them to irretrievable ruin." [217]
How many were exiled at this time and how many exiled from Egypt we do not know. Note here that there were two groups of Jews in Egypt at the time Nebuchadnezzar conquered that country; those who dwelt in Egypt prior to the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, those who fled to Egypt after the murder of Geheliah. It was the descendants of these captives from Egypt and of the 4600 deported from Jerusalem, who returned from Babylon and established themselves as the Jewish Nation in Palestine. These did not include Jeremiah and the daughters of Zedekiah.
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Jews Increase In Babylon
If the "residue" removed to Babylon numbered 15,000 as one writer estimates, they could have increased easily during their captivity, to the number indicated by Ezra (about 50,000). They were urged to marry and raise large families [218]; and they added further to their number by intermarriage with the Babylonians. The Jews were severely criticized for this practice [219].
How much of an alien admixture the Jews received from this source is not known, but it must have been considerable judging by the drastic action taken in the matter by Ezra and Nehemiah.
"In those days also saw I Jews...and I contended with them, and cursed them (the Jews), and Smote Certain of them, and plucked off their hair, and made them swear by God..." [220]
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Jews Who Returned To Jerusalem
In Ezra 2:64‑65, we are told that 42,460 of the congregation and 7,337 servants returned from Babylon; later arrivals brought the total to about 55,000. The servants were, of course, of alien or doubtful ancestry, otherwise they would have been numbered with the congregation. No doubt these servants were eventually absorbed and thus the Jews, in this manner alone, received an alien admixture of about one‑seventh. The Jews intermarried with the Babylonians, Syrians and other races also, as previously pointed out, and such mixture with alien races seems have been sufficient to change the physiognomy indicated in Isaiah 3:9.
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Effects Of Intermarriage
It should be noted that it is a biological virtue to keep the race pure. The Israelites (our forefathers) were instructed, time and again, not to mix with other races. For God knows that only a race of mongrels and a less intelligent, easily controlled progeny is produced. That is why the Jews are continually trying to deceive the White Race into marriage with those of other races, so that they will be more easily controlled.
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Historians and Public Misled
Today it is quite generally held that the ten tribes were "lost" by being absorbed by other races. The popular belief seems to be that Benjamin, part of Levi, the Children of Israel who dwelt in the fenced cities of Judah, and those who joined Asa and Rehoboam for religious reasons, have long since amalgamated with the tribes of Judah, now all Israel is represented in the present day Jew. However, this is in error for Benjamin was told by God to go into the Assyrian captivity with the ten tribes of Israel.
"O ye children of Benjamin, gather yourselves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem..." [221]
Jeremiah was not addressing the people of his time alone but prophetically he set forth the inevitability of judgment whenever apostasy rears its head. In condemning Judah of his day, Jeremiah also condemned Judah of our Lord's time, for he was looking toward the future and saw spoiler after spoiler wasting and desolating Palestine until at length, in the fullness of time, the whole country would become desolate.
The first general ruin was wrought by the armies of Babylon; the final one by the armies of the Romans. Jeremiah's condemnation is therefore much greater in scope than would confine it to his generation alone. It did condemn that generation but there was also the prophetic condemnation applicable to later generations which would become as corrupt and ungodly.
It is because the messages of the prophets were addressed to more than their own people as the seers looked down the stream of time to the end of days, that their writings are recorded in the Bible as a warning to all the Israel people everywhere of the results of unrighteousness. This is not to be taken as proof their statements have no chronological timing. To do so is to entirely overlook the significance of Jeremiah's purpose when he paused in the midst of denouncing Judah for her sins to issue a warning to Benjamin. That tribe was informed of a time to come when a repetition of the evils of the prophet's day would again be in evidence in Judea. When that day came Benjamin was to give heed to the admonishment to flee Jerusalem and Judea.
The fact that Jeremiah's warning to Benjamin was to be heeded by that tribe at a specified time centuries later, furnishes clear evidence of the reliability of the prophetic word. It was in our Lord's day that this tribe known then as Galileans, became the first Christians when they accepted the Messiahship of Jesus Christ. These Benjaminite Galileans heeded the warning and fled Judea just before the destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman armies under Titus in 70 A.D.
The full significance of this warning becomes apparent when it is realized that Jeremiah turned from the immediate task of condemning the rulers and people of Judea to give Benjamin the sign which, if obeyed, would preserve them to carry out their task as "light bearers." Jesus Christ admonished His disciples to flee when they should see armies encompass the city of Jerusalem [222]. He did not refer to Jeremiah's admonition; instead, he was calling His disciples' attention to Daniel's prophecy [223].
If he had cited Jeremiah, the identification of Benjamin and their mission as "light bearers" would have been made known, involving all that this would imply concerning the identification of Israel, long before God intended it should be recognized by either the House of Israel or the Christian world. The knowledge of Israel's identity was not to become generally known until the time of the end.
Not understanding the Scriptures is the reason why the names Israel, Judah and Jew are held to be synonymous, Although no basis for such a belief is to be found in the Scriptures. Compilers of Encyclopedias and Dictionaries seem naively unaware of the fact that these names denote distinct groups among the descendants of Jacob/Israel.
Once the Error is accepted that the terms Israel and Jew are synonymous, the flood-gates of error are wide open and there is nothing to hinder prophecies intended for Israel being applied to the Jews, even though the Holy Word says Plainly "Israel."
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Sennacherib's Raid
Those who hold to this idea should remember that Sennacherib carried away all the people of the Kingdom of Judah except those who were shut up in the city of Jerusalem. Most of these captives were Judahites but among them were Benjaminites, Levites and elements of the other tribes.
These captives were carried away one hundred years before the Babylonian captivity and were "lost" in the same manner as the ten tribes were supposed to have been lost. It matters little whether these Children of Israel, who dwelt in the cities of Judah were few are many in number; They simply could not have been any part of the ancestry of the Jewish which came into existence before Christ.
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Evil Figs
The basket of evil figs which were so bad they couldn't be eaten represented Zedekiah, King of Judah, and his princes. It will be seen that later on in the story that there was a discrimination among the members of Zedekiah's family; not all of them went into the basket of bad figs and came under the subsequent curse. Selection from among them was made when the King's daughters were set apart to continue the reigning line of kings upon the throne of David.
Among the people whom Nebuchadnezzar left in the land were those numbered with the bad figs, together with the colony which had fled to Egypt to escape the King of Babylon and were dwelling there. Of them the Lord said:
"And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them. And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they be consumed from off the land that I gave unto them and to their fathers." [224]
It is certain that a remnant of the survivors of both groups of those carried away captive to Babylon returned to Judea and Jerusalem at the end of the 70 years. Some of that remnant were to be blessed.
The family of Coniah of the House of David was so blessed in the birth of the Messiah, Jesus Christ. A remnant from the tribe of Benjamin also returned and became the Galileans who constituted most of the followers of Christ who accepted Christianity in the first century. But there also returned a remnant of those taken captive with Zedekiah whose descendants were the Jews of our Lord's day. Here are the bad figs of whom Jesus said:
"If God were your Father, ye would love me...Ye (the Jews) are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him." [225]
Can anyone say that in the subsequent history of the Jews, following their rejection and crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the curse pronounced upon the basket of bad figs has not been fulfilled to the letter upon this people? They have become a byword, a taunt and a proverb in all countries, "tossed to and fro" among the nations, and have been cursed and harassed as predicted.
They continue even now under this condemnation in their continued rejection of Christ. Following the teachings of the Talmud, which Jesus described as the traditions of men, and which He condemned [226], this people have been a seed of evil in all nations because they have refused to accept Jesus Christ as the Messiah and keep His Commandments.
Never has the history of any people shown a more noticeably accurate and literal fulfillment of published curses upon them than the history of the Jewish race, exemplified in the centuries of suffering and persecutions which they have had to endure. Nor are these days ended, for in their continued refusal to acknowledge the Messiahship of Christ they plan to take the Kingdom by force and occupy the land of Israel by violence. Their present attitude and acts will only increase and intensify their afflictions.
The suffering of the Jew is in itself irrefutable evidence of the truth of prophecy, for the curse uttered by Jeremiah upon them and their children, and confirmed by the generation of our Lord's day who said, "His blood be on us, and on our children" [227], is being intensified a thousand‑fold in these latter days. It is this group that formed the Nucleus of the Jewish Nation [228].
Compare the former verses of Scripture with those pertaining to Cain and his descendents.
"And now art thou Cursed from the Earth...A Fugitive and a Vagabond shalt thou be in the Earth." [229]
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Jews Are Not Judah
We have traced the origin of the Jewish nation to a minor fraction of the Tribe of Judah, some elements of other Israel Tribes, and a goodly portion of alien admixture. This is residue, which developed into the Jewish Nation, cannot rightly be said to be the Tribe of Judah, any more than a fragment of a broken plate can be called the plate.
While it is True "Some" of the Jews came partly from Judah, but they do not constitute the Tribe of Judah and cannot rightfully claim the prophecies for that Tribe or for any other Israel Tribe.
It is evident that the writer of Acts thought of the Jews as distant from the Tribe of Judah [230]. This is made even more clear in James, where we find that James addressed his epistle to the "twelve tribes scattered abroad." The Jews were not scattered at the time James wrote this Epistle, but the twelve tribes, including Judah, were scattered. Thus the Scriptures do not recognize the Jews as Israelites!
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Charter For The "JEwish Nation"
The ninth chapter of Daniel contains the charter for the Jewish Nation: A nation destined to endure for seventy prophetic weeks; on a scale of a day for a year, or 490 years [231]. This nation was chosen of God to supply the background and surroundings for the coming of the Messiah [232]. When those purposes were accomplished, the Jews rejected Christ as their Saviour when they cried,
"Crucify Him, Crucify Him. His blood be on us and on our children." [233]
They rejected Christ as King, also, by declaring,
"We have no king but Caesar." [234]
The legitimate mission of the Jewish nation thus ended, and by their own actions they terminated their national charter even as Christ had previously told them:
"The Kingdom of God shall be taken from you..." [235]
Note in this connection the marginal rendering of one in Daniel 9:16:
"The Jews they shall be no more His People."
The Bible commentator did not understand that The Jews, themselves, Were "never" God's People, only their forefathers who were Israelites before the intermarriage between them and the other races. The dispersion of the Jews begin when the Romans captured Jerusalem in 70 A.D. The dispersions and judgments pronounced upon the "residue" (Jews) in Jerusalem [236]. have continued down through the centuries and the end is not yet.
Ezekiel described the Jews in the following way:
"Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, cause Jerusalem to know her abominations, And say, Thus saith the Lord God unto Jerusalem; Thy Birth and Thy Nativity is of the Land of Canaan; thy father was an Amorite, and thy mother an Hittite...Thou hast slain my Children, and Delivered them to cause them to pass through the Fire for Them?...Thus saith the Lord God; Because thy filthiness was poured out, and thy nakedness discovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers, and with all the idols of thy abominations, and by the blood of thy children, which thou didst give unto them; Behold, therefore I will gather all thy lovers, with whom thou hast taken pleasure, and all them that thou hast loved, with all them that thou has hated; I will even gather them round about against thee, and will discover thy nakedness unto them, that they may see all thy nakedness. And I will judge thee, as women that break wedlock and shed blood are judged; and I will give thee blood in fury and jealousy. And I will also give thee into their hand, and they shall throw down thine eminent place, and shall break down thy high places: They shall strip thee also of thy clothes, and shall take thy fair jewels, and leave thee naked and bare. They shall also bring up a company against thee, and they shall stone thee with stones, and thrust thee through with their swords. And they shall burn thine houses with fire, and execute judgments upon thee in the sight of many women: and I will cause thee to cease from playing the harlot, and thou also shalt give no hire any more." [237]
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Jews Were Never Lost
Most people consider the Tribes of Israel "lost." Which is indeed true and it is also true, that the Tribes of Benjamin and Judah are also "lost." For ALL the Tribes of Jacob/Israel were to "lose" their identity.
"And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying...They Shall Put My Name Upon The Children of Israel..." [238]; "...And Thou Shalt Be Called By A New Name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name." [239]; "...And Call His (God's)Servants (Israel)By Another Name." [240]
However, The Jews Are Not Lost; They Have Never Changed Their Name; and Have Never Been Lost: For the World Has Never Been Permitted to Forget Them!!! They are parasites; Indeed they are like a cancer which has been slowly eating away at the Body of Christ: The Church, and the Children of Israel, the Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic and Kindred people. To write a detailed history of the Anglo‑Saxons would be to write of the blessings to all mankind.� For God promised: "In Thee Shall All the Families of the Earth be Blessed." [241]
To write a detailed history of The Jews Would Be to write of wars, treason, intrigue, murder, the shedding of righteous blood and A Curse To All The Families of the Earth. for it is written:
"I will deliver them (Jews) to be removed into all the kingdoms (nations) of the earth for their hurt, To be a Reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a Curse, in all places whither I shall drive them." [242]; "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!...Ye serpents, ye generation (Race) of vipers, How can ye Escape the Damnation of Hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge In Your Synagogues (only the Jews have Synagogues), and persecute them from city to city: That upon you (Jews)May Come All the Righteous Blood shed upon the Earth, From the Blood of Righteous Abel (and who slew Abel, Cain, and Satan was Cain's father)." [243]
Therefore, Jesus is saying in effect: "You Jews are (Satan's Children)..." [244]; "And in Her (Mystery Babylon, Judaism, the Jews)Was Found The Blood of Prophets, and of Saints, and of all that were slain upon the Earth." [245]
���������������������������������������������������������������������������� Benjamin Franklin and John Crysostom
������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Warned America About Their Enemies
"The wickedness of the Jews consists, not in their conduct but in their Jewishness. The Jews are men possessed by an evil spirit and are habitual murderers and destroyers. We should not even salute them, or have the slightest converse with them." [246]
Benjamin Franklin told our Forefathers:
��� "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; Have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian Religion upon which that nation is founded by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.
��� For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they call Palestine. But, Gentlemen, Did the World today give it to them in Fee Simple, they would at once find some cogent Reason for not returning. Why? Because they are Vampires, and Vampires do not live on Vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.
��� If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government (which they have done; they have changed it from a Republic to a Democracy), for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.
��� If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our Descendants will be working in the Fields to furnish them sustenance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A Leopard cannot change its spots.
���� Jews are Asiatics, they are a menace to this country if permitted entrance and should be excluded by this Constitution." [247]
God says in the Scriptures concerning the Jews:
"Why boastest thou thyself in mischief...Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs...working deceitfully. Thou lovest evil more than good; and lying rather than to speak righteousness. Thou lovest all devouring words...God shall likewise destroy thee for ever..." [248]; "For a voice declareth from...Mount Ephraim...behold, publish against Jerusalem...Thy way and thy doings have procured these things unto thee; this is thy wickedness...Though thou clothest thyself with crimson, though thou deckest thee with ornaments of gold, though thou rentest thy face with painting, in vain shalt thou make thyself fair; Thy Lovers (the Communist countries)Will Despise Thee,They Will Seek Thy Life." [249]
������������������������������������������������������������������������������ Troubled Times For The Jewish People
Immediately after their return from Babylon, the Jews had "troublious" times while building the Temple and walls about Jerusalem. Their condition was tolerable while they remained under the rather mild rule of Medio‑Persia; but after the fall of that Empire, the Jews were almost continually subject to persecution.
Their condition became rather trying after the death of Alexander the Great, and was particularly bad after the battle of Ipsus (301 B.C.), when the Ptolemys became firmly established in Egypt, and when a few years later the Selucids became the masters of Syria: These powers becoming respectively the "King of the South" and the "King of the North" as mentioned in Daniel. These two nations were at war with each other most of the time, and Palestine, a strip of land bound on the West by the Mediterranean and on the East by the Jordan River and desert beyond, was a natural highway over which the contending forces of Egypt and Syria armies, the Jews having to exist under ever changing rulership.
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Antiochus The Worst Oppressor
The worst period for the Jews came during the rule of Antiochus Epiphanes (175‑164 B.C.). He took Jerusalem, slew 40,000 people and plundered the Temple. And as a crowning insult to the Jews, Antiochus had a sow butchered in the "Holy of Holies" and its blood sprinkled on the sacred things in the Temple (Many believe in error that this was the abomination of desolation as spoken of by Daniel). Antiochus sought to Helenize the Jews, with no little success, and was aided in that effort by some of the Jews themselves. Evidently he planned a totalitarianism where all the people in his realm should adhere to a uniform religious practice dictated by him, with death the fate of the non‑conformists.
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Jews Come Under Roman Rule
This brought on the Macabee wars which in turn brought the Jews a short‑lived independence; but the successors of the Macabees soon promoted wars of their own and the fighting continued. At this time the Roman Empire was rapidly extending its rule; Syria became a Roman Province in 64 B.C. while Palestine and Egypt came under Roman rule soon thereafter at the request of the Jewish Pharisees. It is difficult to state at what time the Pharisees, as a party, arose. Josephus first mentions them in connection with Johathan, the successor of Judas Macabeus [250].
Under John Hyrcanus (135‑105 B.C.) they appear as a powerful party opposing the Sadducean proclivities of the king, who had formerly been a disciple of theirs, through the story as told by Josephus is unhistorical [251].
The Hasmonean dynasty, with its worldly ambitions and aspirations, met with little support from the Pharisees, whose aim was the maintenance of a religious spirit in accordance with their interpretation of the Law. Under his widow, Salome Alexandra (78 ‑ 69 B.C.), the Pharisees, led by Simeon ben Shetah, came to power; they obtained seats in the Sanhedrin, and that time was afterward regarded as the golden age, full of the blessing of heaven. But the bloody vengeance they took upon the Sadducees led to a terrible reaction, and under Aristobulus (69‑63 B.C.) the Sadducees regained their power [252].
Amidst the bitter struggle which ensued, The Pharisees Appeared Before Pompey (Anglicized name of Gaseus Pompeius Magnus Imagnas), 106‑48 B.C. Roman general and statesman; defeated by Julius Caesar) Asking him to interfere (Bring Palestine under Roman rule) and restore the old priesthood (which would destroy their opposition) while abolishing the royalty of the Hasmoneans altogether [253].
The defilement of the Temple by Pompey was regarded by the Pharisees as a divine punishment of Sadducean misrule. After the national independence had been lost, the Pharisees gained in influence while the star of the Sadducees waned. [254]
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Priesthood
The Jews have never had a Priesthood that officiated at an altar. The Jews do not believe in the Altar!!! Only Christian Israel has consistently walked forward with a Priesthood throughout all the centuries of time since she was formed into a Nation and a Church at Mount Sinai in B.C. 1491 (Think about it America was declared discovered in A.D. 1492 but the voyage started in 1491!!!) No other people in the world have maintained a Priesthood except in the White Christian Caucasian Nations of the earth! This is a Certain Sign, an absolute footprint, that points to the identification of the Modern Anglo‑Saxon Nations as being the Israelites of the Bible. Nothing else makes any sense whatsoever.
������������������������������������������������������������������������� American Christians Do Not Seek The Truth
However, Christians of today will not search out the truth for themselves, instead they listen to the Prostitute "Ministers" who are owned body and soul by the Enemies of Christ; Satan's Children and Present Themselves as the "Chosen People of God."
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� A Great Conspiracy
What is the actual objective of the Zionists? It is certainly not benevolent and peaceful for their utterances and actions prove otherwise. What is their goal? The Scriptures are clear concerning a diabolical conspiracy to destroy the way of peace and enslave mankind. This entire program of evil would have been clearly recognized by Christian men and women long ago but for the skilfully prepared, deceptive teachings of the Clergy of Organized Religion, the Prostitutes of Zionism, as are the TV Clergy of today, who had everything to gain and so have falsified the facts regarding the identity of the race of the Bible and assigned to the Jews the promises and blessings which belong to the House of Israel. The result has been to give the Jew an entirely false position of supposed pre‑eminence in the light of the prophetic word which actually he will never be able to occupy.
The so‑called Theologians have completely failed to examine the evidence to see whether the Jews are really entitled to the position the modern Organized Religions has assigned to them. The assumption that the Jews are all of Israel today has closed much of the Bible to Christian understanding. Furthermore, it has had far‑reaching results in blinding men to the meaning of current world developments and it has materially assisted those who are endeavoring to acquire world rulership by furthering their subversive activities. This Christian leniency in regard to Jewish aspirations have been based upon the expectation that the Jews are to eventually come into world rulership.
Thus, the Zionists, unsupported by any Scriptural evidence whatever to substantiate their claims, are moving toward the consummation of their plans for world rulership. And in so doing they are making world revolution and war inevitable which will climax in a reign of violence and bloodshed bringing the present age to its close.
|
The Pity of it all, is. The Christian World is Responsible for much of this Planned Chaos, at least to the extent that they have extolled the Jews as God's People who are chosen to rule the world. Actually, the Zionists are seducing the nations of the world and they, The Jews, have deceived Christian People everywhere into believing, falsely, they are the Israel of God so that no active protest is made while they boldly pursue their aim to gain World Control. |
The fallacy of assigning to the Jews the prophecies and blessings pronounced upon the House of Israel is not in conformity with the great prophecies of the restoration of the House of Israel. The Zionists, however, are fulfilling ominous prophecies which foreshadow the coming of evil, not the coming of peace. Their move toward Palestine was a harbinger that the Great and Terrible Day of the Lord is very near.
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Gullible Americans
It is almost impossible for men to frankly discuss the import of what is taking place because of the powerful propaganda machine of the Anti‑ Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith, as well as many other active agencies of the Zionists; who will immediately set their well‑oiled machine in motion to smear those who have the intrepidity to set forth the truth. Then too they are aided by those so‑called Christian clergy who would rather serve mammon than God and refuse to admit to the errors they have been teaching for so long.
If exposure becomes even a remote possibility, the cry of anti‑Semitism is promptly raised. The result is that gullible Americans allow their eyes to be closed to the truth in an misguided assumption that in so doing they are being tolerant, when actually they are playing the part of stupid asses.
As they slumber and sleep the enemy is moving forward to consummate his well laid plans to destroy freedom and enslave those over whom he will rule. The threat of being labeled anti‑Semitic has become, in itself, a singularly powerful weapon in the hands of the plotters to prevent the public exposure of their sinister aims.
If Christian men and women continue to fear to hear or speak the truth, and refuse to investigate the facts or raise their voices in warning against evil and devilish intrigue, the day will come when freedom of speech and the press, as well as of conscience, will pass away in our own land just as it passed away in all countries behind the Iron Curtain. To those who know and understand what is taking place, this assertion does not presage an idle threat, for they know that unless America awakens soon the enemy within will destroy our freedom and seize openly our government.
���������������������������������������������������������������� What Christians Can Expect From "Our Government"
����������������������������������������������� While Under The Control of The Jewish-Zionists and Non-Believers
At the present time it does not matter what you believe about the formation of America; as to whether it was formed as a Christian nation or not.
For anyone who will use his/her mind, will come to realize that our beloved America has come under the absolute control of the Jewish‑Zionists and non‑believers, through their control of the American Government; Which control is guaranteed through their control of the Democratic and Republican Parties, wherein only "their" agents can be nominated and elected, with the aid of the Jewish‑Zionist‑Communist owned news media. That this is true, is an undeniable fact. This can also be observed by the very fact that MOST of the elected and appointed officials are either non‑Christians or who profess no beliefs at all.
��� Now this turn of events produces a second question: Is that alright and will it make any difference to the Christians of America? In the following, we will attempt to answer these two very important questions.
In Matthew we find the following:
"The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him (Christ) that he would shew them a sign from heaven. He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red. And in the morning, It will be foul weather today: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?" [255]
Jesus then goes on to say:
"A wicked and adulterous generation (From the word 'gena' #1074 meaning 'nation' and 'genos' #1085 meaning 'nation,' 'offspring' and 'stock.' Combined with #1074 and #1076 of Strong's Concordance. We can see that Jesus is saying in effect 'A wicked and adulterous 'Race') seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas."
The Clergy of Organized Religion falsely teach that this word "generation" means a time span of a persons life of between 20 to 40 years. However, with a careful study of #1074 we find in #1075 which is from #1074 that "generation" also is derived from "genealogy and tracing by generations." Therefore one can understand without difficulty that Jesus was telling Christians that the Pharisees and Sadducees (the Jews) were/are a wicked and adulterous "Race." This point is further enlarged upon by Christ in Matthew 23 and John 8.
Now there is another lesson Jesus attempted to teach us immediately following the above.
"And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread. Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread." [256]
They thought Jesus was making reference to the bread they had forgotten, because of His reference to the "leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees" as the word "leaven" was usually used in reference to the baking of bread.
"Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them. O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread? Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the Doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees." [257]
Jesus was teaching them and us, His followers, indeed, He was giving a warning to beware of the false lying doctrine of the Pharisees and the Sadducees (the Jews)! So there you have it: A warning given to us (Christians) over 1900 years ago by the Lord Jesus Christ, our (the True Children of Israel) Redeemer, our Saviour, to beware of the doctrine (Jewish Fables) of the Jews.
Therefore it is clearly obvious Jesus was telling His People Israel that the "teachings" of the Jews and all non‑believers can be dangerous to them; Thus Christians are to take warning and beware of their false doctrines and teachings.
In John Fifteen Jesus said:
"Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they (the Jews) have persecuted me, they (the Jews) will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep your's also. But all these things will they (the Jews) do unto you for my name's sake (because you are called Christians, named after Me, and because they are Satan's Children [258] and hated and persecuted Me, the Jews will hate and persecute you), because they know not him that sent me (therefore we are to understand by Jesus' words that the Jews, even though they profess a belief in God, they are lying, For They Do Not Know Him!)." [259]
Here Jesus is once again warning His Christian followers that the Jews and non‑believers will do to them as they did to Him. And what did the Jews and non‑believers do to Him? They killed Him.
The following should suffice to prove that it was indeed the Jews who killed Christ:
"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing...he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude (both Jews and non‑believers), saying, I am innocent (he and therefore his men would have nothing to do with what followed) of the blood (he would have no part in the shedding of Christ's Blood) of this just person (here he was giving testimony that the Jews were about to slay an innocent man which was a fulfillment of the prophesy; 'They that hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of mine head: they that would destroy me, being mine enemies wrongfully, are mighty...I am become a stranger unto my brethren, and an alien unto my mother's children. For the zeal of thine house hath eaten me up; and the reproaches of them that reproached thee are fallen upon me...They that sit in the gate (rulers, elders, judges) speak against me...They gave me also gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink...' [260]): see ye (Jews) to it...Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children...Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the common hall, and gathered (assembled [261] an assemblage of persons: spec. a Jewish 'synagogue' [262]) unto him the whole band (a squad of Levitical...band, [263]) of soldiers...And they (Jews and non‑believers) crucified him." [264]
Again:
"But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of JUDEA, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem (the Jews), be this known unto you, and hearken to my words...Him (Christ)...Ye (Jews)Have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain...This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we are all witnesses...Therefore let ALL the house of Israel known assuredly...that same Jesus, Whom Ye (Jews and non‑believers)Have Crucified." [265]; "And as they spake unto the people, the priests, and the Captain of The Temple, and the Sadducees, came upon them...and Annas the high the priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem...Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them...Be it known...to All the people of Israel, That...Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Whom ye (the Jews, the Sadducees, the priests; Clergy of Organized Religion, the captain of the temple, the leader of the band of soldiers, Annas the high priest, Caiaphas, John, Alexander and kindred of the high priest, again making reference to the Jews)Crucified." [266]; "Then the high priest rose up, and all they (the Jews) that were with him...And laid their hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison. But the angel of the Lord by night opened the prison doors, and brought them forth, and said, Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life...Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said...The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, Whom Ye (the Jews and non‑believers)Slew and Hanged on a Tree." [267]
Thus Jesus is warning His People Israel and the Christians who follow Him, that whenever the Jews and non‑believers obtain absolute control over them; They will kill them whenever possible. And not one of our so‑called "Ministers" or "Pastors" of the Clergy of Organized Religion is warning their flocks of this fact.
Not one word of warning from the pulpits of America have/are coming forth even though millions upon millions of Christians have been murdered in Russia and the other Communist Countries by the Jews and non‑believers in this century alone.
Now let us go to Matthew Chapter Twenty One, where we find:
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers (this was a declaration of war as far as the money hungry Jews were concerned), and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye (Jews) have made it a den of thieves." [268]
This story is so important, it is also related in Mark Eleven and John Two.
However in none of the three gospels is there ANY indication that the people therein were believers in the Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore it would be safe to assume that they consisted of Jews and other non‑believers. And what had they done? They had, according to the testimony of Christ, turned the very House of God into a den of thieves, a sanctuary or a safe heaven, if you please, for thieves and the enemies of Christ!
Think about it. If the Jews and non‑believers had turned the House of God into a sanctuary, a safe heaven and a den of thieves in the time of Christ; is it not possible that the Jews and non‑believers of today, would do the same, and attempt, and it would appear, Have already done so turned today's Houses of God, Through Organized Religion, into a sanctuary, a safe haven and a den of thieves? It would further appear that the anti‑Christ antics of the Jimmy and Tammy Bakkers, Jimmy Swaggarts, Oral Roberts and others prove this to be true.
Now let us proceed further in Matthew Twenty One where we find related the following parable:
"Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country (most who study the Scriptures, know that the master, the ruler or the man of authority in the parables cited by Christ is either Almighty God, or the Lord Jesus Christ)." [269]
Here many will ask what is the vineyard? For an answer let us turn to Isaiah Chapter Five were we find what appears to be God's Vineyard.
"Now will I sing to my well beloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard. My well beloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill: And he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes. And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem, and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, betwixt me and my vineyard (Here God is talking to the men of Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem and identifies the vineyard of Matthew 21 as His vineyard). What could have been done more to my vineyard, that I have not done in it? Wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down: And I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned, nor digged; but there shall come up briers and thorns: I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it (What is it? Is it an actual physical vineyard? No it is the House of Israel. Also God is saying in effect that there will be, for all practical purposes, no true 'pastors' to pray for rain (water) so there will be no water (water is in Bible prophesy the Word of God) or rain for Israel during this period of time). For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant (but God makes no reference to the husbandmen as being His, therefore we must take it into account and realize that the Jews the husbandmen are not God's Chosen)." [270].
So we can see, it has been well established by the foregoing Scriptures that God's vineyard is Israel. We presented this so as to establish for you. the reader, that the householder is God and the vineyard, as mentioned in Matthew 21 is Israel!
Now let us continue.
"And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen (to the people who ruled over the vineyard), that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise (remember from the Old and the New Testament how when God sent prophets unto Israel, the leaders, or rulers would beat or kill them). But last of all he sent unto them his son (in other words God Almighty sent His Son the Lord Jesus Christ unto them, those who were ruling over a portion of Israel), saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen (the rulers, Herod, the Pharisees, Sadducees, the Jews) saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir (the Future King of Israel); come, let us (the rulers; the Jews) kill him, and let us (the Jews) seize on his inheritance (Notice, it was the husbandmen, the Jews, who were saying let us kill him (Jesus) and seize His inheritance. The vineyard (Israel) which was Already God's inheritance; So it is obvious that the Jews were attempting to replace Israel with themselves. Also Notice Jesus was not accusing the vineyard (Israel) of killing Him, but was instead accusing the Jews). And they (the Jews) caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard (What did they cast Him out of? They cast Him out of the vineyard, out of Israel. Then what did they do?), and Slew Him." [271]
Thus we can clearly see that this Parable plainly teaches that it was the husbandmen (the rulers of Israel, the Jews) who killed the Lord Jesus Christ.
Now let us identify who the rulers over Israel were when the Son (the Lord Jesus Christ) of the householder (Almighty God) came into the vineyard (Israel). Turn with us to the 23rd Chapter of Matthew, where we find Jesus talking:
"Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not." [272]
Therefore, who ruled over Israel when God sent His Son unto the House of Israel? The answer, of course, as we have seen; it was the scribes and Pharisees; the Jews, who were the rulers (the husbandmen) over Israel when Jesus came to earth.
Now let's go on in Matthew 21 where Jesus is still talking to the Jews and says:
"When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? They (the Jews) say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons (remember there is a Scriptural principle that men will be punished according to their own thoughts. Also this provides and understanding as to why Jesus later said in that same chapter: 'Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.' [273]). Jesus saith unto them (here Jesus is verifying what they have just said is true), Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner (He is quoting Psalms and Isaiah to prove that He (Christ) is that stone): this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you (the scribes and Pharisees, the Jews, and non‑believers), The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone (Jesus) shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them (Finally after Jesus has finished His Parable the priests and Pharisees realized He was talking about them; that he knew who they were). But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet (Here the Jews and non‑believers would have killed Jesus right at that moment, except that they were afraid that if they did, the multitude would destroy them)." [274]
There are all too many Clergy of Organized Religion and others today who teach that the priests, scribes and Pharisees were Israelites. But I would point out to you that if the scribes and Pharisees were attempting to seize the inheritance, which is Israel, then how can you say they were attempting to seize themselves. No it is obvious to any thinking Christian, with any understanding at all, that the priests, scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees, The Jews, were not Israelites, but were instead Outsiders!
This parable related that Jesus will utterly destroy these evil husbandmen, the priests, scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees, the Jews. But there are No Scriptures in the Old or New Testament which relate that Jesus is going to destroy Israel. However, there are hundreds of Scriptures which relate that Jesus will destroy His enemies.
As a matter of fact the Gospel of the New Testament, is that Jesus came to redeem and to save Israel and Not to Destroy it! Yet it is made very plain in this parable that He will utterly destroy the husbandmen; the Jews when He returns.
In John 15 Jesus again relates to His People (Israel/Christians):
"Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they (scribes and Pharisees ‑‑ the Jews) have persecuted me, they (the Jews) will also persecute you ('Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city.' [275])...But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him (God) that sent me (Those who hated Him and persecuted Him; they will hate and persecute those who follow Him. This passage of Scripture alone should put Christians on notice that the Jews and non‑believers will persecute and kill them (Christians) if they are able to obtain absolute control over them. But all too many Christians ignore these warnings and the fact that untold millions of Christians, in this century alone have been murdered by the Jews and non‑believers, and think their non‑belief will have no effect upon them. They have this belief because the false prophets, ministers, pastors or by whatever name they call themselves, Give no Warning From The Pulpits of America!) If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke (no cover, no excuse) for their sin. He that hateth me hateth my Father also. If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father (Here is another passage of Scripture that shows that anyone who hates Jesus also hates Almighty God. Thus it is abundantly clear: That anyone who teaches it is possible to hate Jesus while at the same time, love the God of the Old Testament Is A Liar! In fact that teacher is attempting to deceive you!)." [276]
Now let us return once again to Matthew 23:
"For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries (either of two small, leather cases holding slips, today, inscribed with Talmudic passages: one is fastened with leather thongs to the forehead and one to the left arm by Orthodox or Conservative Jewish men), and enlarge the borders (the larger the border the more influence one has pertaining to the Jewish religious laws) of their garments. And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi (Therefore, these words of Jesus Christ should help us (Christians) recognize and identify these men as Jews, who ruled over Israel and would persecute the believers in the Lord Jesus Christ)...But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in (They oppose the Kingdom of Heaven and try to keep other men out of it. Which means that today, as well as then, they would oppose the teachings of and about the Lord Jesus Christ: Even to the point of becoming members of the Clergy in order to teach false doctrines [277] and Jewish fables (1 Titus 1:14) in their efforts to deceive men and prevent them from studying and understanding the Word of God and the Kingdom). Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer (Who has caused more widows and orphans than ungodly government? How many orphans and widows did it create in the no‑win wars of Vietnam and Korea? Who has passed evil decrees (falsely called 'laws') depriving those helpless fatherless of their God given right to life and who has enforced and financially supported those decrees? Our Government! Try to tell those pure, innocent, Godly little babies as their limbs are sucked from their bodies into the sewers that there is no Government persecution. For further illustration and as a case in point, consider the so‑called laws that government has passed and which the courts have promoted concerning probate. The late Robert Kennedy while Attorney General of the United States, once called probate 'a political toll both exacting tribute from Widows and Orphans.' Many a dead man has had the estate he built and saved for, stolen from his surviving widow and fatherless children through taxes, lawyers and court probate costs. Yet the same men who promote such robbery have their own holdings in trusts exempt from such theft. Lawyers love and prosper from the enactment of such evil statutes and guess who predominantly makes up Congress and the (Satan's) Supreme Court? Lawyers! A government composed of such men does not like a religious movement that would make such an exposure. This is not new for the Pharisee lawyers of Jesus' day did not like the old‑time religious teachings of Jesus either.): therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation (There are two things presented here; (1) They are thieves and like to prey on the weak and helpless. (2) And while they do their evil works, they represent themselves as being very religious)...Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone (It appears that the Jews do pay tithes to some sort of church or religion but they oppose the law of God, judgment, mercy and all of the doctrines of the Christian faith)...Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness (In other words their outward appearances does not show their inward corruptness; they do not appear to be evil to the naked eye. So don't look for the Jews or other non‑Christians by saying to yourself I will look for someone who looks evil and will thus recognize them as being unbelievers and a wicked person. Thus Jesus was telling us, as Christians, that they would appear outwardly as very religious and righteous men instead of men who are dead in sin)...Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous (Jesus is saying you killed the prophets and you will kill the righteous. Now many will wonder who the righteous are according to New Testament theologies? They are the Christian believers.). And say, If we had been in the days of our (the Jews) fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets (Do you understand what the scribes and Pharisees, the Jews are admitting to Jesus! They are admitting that it was their fathers who either killed the prophets or participated and were in fact instrumental in their deaths and persecutions! Jesus then goes on to verify that their testimony was true). Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation (Race) of vipers (snakes ‑‑ the children of the serpent or Satan), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" [278]
Now make no mistake we are not holding the House of Israel up as completely innocent; because it was Thrie Sins and Refusal to Obey God's Commandments, Laws and Statutes which brought about these curses and the shedding of innocent blood in the first place. For they have always been disobedient to God; which is why God referred to them as "wild grapes" in Isaiah 5:2.
Now let us continue.
"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but Try the spirits whether they are of God; because many false prophets are gone out into the world (This is an admonishment to Christians to beware and not believe just anyone who comes along and represents himself/herself as God's servant, because many of the anti‑Christs do so in an effort to deceive them)." [279]; "And they watched him, and Sent Forth Spies, Which Should Feign Themselves Just Men, that they might take hold of his (Jesus' sayings. The Jews and non‑believers do the same today to the True Men of God who preach/teach the Gospel of the Kingdom of Christ) words, that so they might deliver him (Jesus/Christians) unto the power and authority of the governor (government)." [280]; "For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ (telling men that Jesus was the Christ, which even the devils declare Jesus Christ to be the Son of God ‑‑ 'And when he (Christ) was come to the other side...there met him two possessed with devils...And, behold, they (the devils) cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God?') [281]; and shall deceive many." [282]
Perhaps the most successful programs, although little more so than the cry of anti‑Semitism, against Christians for almost two thousand years, has been the Jewish control of propaganda and the painting of men of a color (presenting them as something) they are not. "...the Jews...when they saw him (Paul) in the temple, Stirred up all the People (just as they do today with their control of the news media), and laid hands on him, Crying out, Men of Israel, help (here again, just as today they (the Jews) cried out to the men of Israel (Christians) to help them in their evil deeds. Which is directly against God's commandment: '...the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience). Be not ye therefore partakers with them.'"
Ephesians 5:6‑7:
"This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people (thus we see the Jews first use of what we know today as 'anti‑Semitism' and the trying to persuade men that that is a crime), and the law, and this place (This is another way of accusing men of 'Sedition.')." [283]
We also find in Acts the following:
"But the Jews...moved with envy (jealously), took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar (the Jews do exactly the same thing today whenever anyone hinders or threatens the fulfillment of their desires)...that have turned the world upside down (It is always upsetting to evil and wicked men, the Jews, when they are threatened with losing their control and are being exposed to the general public) are come hither also; Whom Jason hath received (notice how they attempt to make Jason guilty simply by association): and these all do contrary to the decrees of Caesar (today Christians are considered criminals because they refuse to obey some man‑made laws such as the murder of unborn babies or oppose unjust laws such as the income tax laws. This because our government has become an outlaw and murderer: King Herod, The Baby Murderer, would, no doubt, blush and hang his head in shame at the amount of abortion blood that presently flows from Uncle Sam's and the Supreme Courts' hands; Pharaoh's River Nile never flowed with the number of murdered babies as now flows in the sewer lines of just one of the 'many' hundred abortion clinics which infest our land; The annual forceful plunder of American's tax dollars which occurs every year would embarrass even Marcus Aurelius; The use of those tax dollars in the murder of hundreds of innocent Palestineans through the ungodly and unholy alliance between the United States and the Christless bandit State of Israel; Our governments sanctioned affirmative action program ‑ reversed discrimination ‑ used against our White Anglo‑Saxon People, makes Pharaoh's oppression look like a rest home in comparison and today's modern anti‑Christ Supreme Court rulings no doubt please even Satan himself. 'By their fruits ye shall know them.' With such 'fruits' can there be any doubt that the modern brand of Judeo‑Christianity which exists in America today is the old‑time religion of history and Scripture as the Baal religion. For the Bible describes the Baal religion as one in alliance with ungodly government teachings of the people of blind submission and obedience.), saying that is another king (higher authority), one Jesus." [284]
The reason for the Jews and non‑believers hatred and their anti‑Christ activities is revealed in the following Scriptures!
"Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees a council and said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles. If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation." [285]
Notice the Jews said we have got to stop this Christ, because if we leave Him alone all men will come to believe on Him and will then become Christians. If that happens then the military will come and take our place and authority; they will even remove our nation from them, thus removing our place of wealth and authority over them forever.
Therefore by the foregoing one can clearly see that the three main reasons for their attempt to destroy Christ, Christianity and the Anglo‑ Saxons.
� 1). CHRIST: because all men would come to believe on Him, thus;
� 2). CHRISTIANS: they would become Christians, and
� 3). ANGLO‑SAXONS: so they (the Jews) might steal back the birthright their father Esau sold to Jacob.
But the Lord God Almighty is against the Clergy of Organized Religion, the false prophets and teachers of today, for He said:
"Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the Lord. Therefore thus saith the Lord God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the Lord...For the land is full of adulterers (men who worship other gods); for because of swearing the land mourneth; the pleasant places of the wilderness are dried up, and their course is evil, and their force is not right. For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house (the church houses) have I found their wickedness, saith the Lord. Wherefore their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein: for I will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation, saith the Lord. And I have seen folly in the prophets...they prophesied in Baal, and caused my people Israel to err. I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem (America) an horrible thing: they commit adultery (worship other gods), and walk in lies (Jimmy Swaggert, Oral Roberts, Jim Bakker and others): they strengthen also the hands of evildoers (teach the people blind obedience to the laws of man and disregard the laws of God), that none doth return from his wickedness (they do this so that men will not study the Scriptures and learn of the Saving grace of the Lord Jesus Christ which if they believed on Him would remove the evil doers from the land): they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah (remember the reports that more than half of the so‑called priests of Organized Religion are Sodomites‑Queers). Therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts concerning the prophets; Behold, I will feed them with wormwood, and make them drink the water of gall: for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth into all the land. Thus saith the Lord of hosts, Hearken not unto the Words of the Prophets that Prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord. They say still unto them that despise me (the Jews), The Lord hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart (the non‑believers), No evil shall come upon you. For who hath stood in the counsel of the Lord, and hath perceived and heard his word? who hath marked his word, and heard it? Behold, a whirlwind of the Lord is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked. The anger of the Lord shall not return, until he have executed, and till he have performed the thoughts of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it perfectly. I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied. But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings...I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people (Israel) to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully...I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that steal my words every one from his neighbour. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that use their tongues, and say, He saith. Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not or commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the Lord...Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence: And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten." [286]
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Right-Wing Extremists
The Right‑wing Extremists didn't save the Communist regime in the Soviet Union by extending to it diplomatic immunity, nor save the economy of the Soviets with $11 billion in lend‑lease and uncounted billions in low or on interest loans, nor gave the Red Communist the secrets of the atomic bomb, nor force refugees from Communism back under the Iron Curtain, nor made a deal to sell Poland and Eastern Europe to the Communist Empire. The Right‑wing Extremist didn't arrange for the victory of the Communist over the Nationalist Government of China, nor deny aid to the Freedom Fighters in Poznan, East Berlin and Hungary, nor support the Communists in driving the Dutch out of Indonesia, nor protect Communist agents holding high offices in the United States Government, nor denied victory to our American troops in Korea, nor gave aid and comfort to the enemy by publicly entertaining the Communist Boss Kruschev, nor attacked Patriotic Americans.
But those who did all of these things and more, tell the American people they should beware of the Right‑wing Extremists. Why? What have they ever done to hurt or subvert America???
����������������������������������������������������������������������������� The Jews Are Numbered For Slaughter
There is only one explanation for this strange urge and it is found in the command of our Lord and Saviour when He left instructions that those who would not have Him reign over them (the Jews) were to be brought to Palestine to meet Him and to be slain before Him.
He spoke and, looking down through the ages to the end of the present order, at which time He would return from the "far country," He knew that by then the Jews would have been scattered far and wide over the face of the earth. The command, "Bring hither," means, "Bring them here, to this place; that is, Palestine."
So today the unbelieving Jews are trekking by the thousands to that land. It is apparently impossible for Jews compelled by this inward feeling of urgency to resist the desire to go as soon as possible to Palestine, for a power beyond this earth is forcing them to take up their march toward the Middle East in one of the greatest mass movements of modern times.
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Seizing The Inheritance
The question may well be asked, Why must the Jews of today suffer for the deeds of their forefathers who nearly two thousand years ago crucified Jesus. Why are the Jews of today subject to a judgment of slaughter for which they are even now going to the land of Palestine? These are vital questions and the answer will be found in another parable given by our Lord. It gives the reason why the verdict against the Jews has been passed on to their children and their children's children, even to the present generation [287].
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Verdict Justified
Since the House of Israel was away from Palestine, the Nations of the Jews had usurped the Kingdom. Because of the unrighteous methods of the Jews of that day, and their rejection of Jesus Christ, it came about as the Lord had warned in the parable and the Kingdom was taken from them and given to a nation that would bring forth its fruits (True House of Israel). This Parable of the Vineyard is a perfectly accurate description of the conditions leading up to the crucifixion and the plot to seize the Kingdom.
The Jews are the "husbandmen" in the parable and they refused to receive the prophets, who were the "servants" in the parable. Later they rejected and crucified Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was obviously the "son" of the parable. What is not generally realized is that there are approximately twenty centuries between the fulfillment of "This is the heir; come, let us kill him" and "Let us seize on his inheritance."
Now, after nearly two thousand years have passed, the Zionists are undertaking to establish a kingdom in Palestine and seize our Lord's inheritance by violence. Coupled with this is their declaration that the commencement of a messianic era has come and that they, as a race, have a messianic destiny. Actually, the Zionists are boldly seeking world control, hoping to inherit world rulership which belongs to the Lord Jesus Christ alone.
It is also very clear from the parable that, timed with the coming of the Lord of the vineyard, i.e., the triumphant return of our Lord, is the climatic move on the part of the "husbandmen" to seize the inheritance. In the establishment of the Israeli State in Palestine we are seeing the fulfillment of the final act portrayed in the parable just before the Lord returns.
It is clearly evident to any observant person that the Politicians and governments of the world are under the control of the Zionist forces and even American Presidents yield to them, rather than to expose their activities and risk losing an election or their lives.
"It seems to me, when I consider the power of that entombed gold and the pattern of events...that there are great, organized forces in the world, which are spread over many countries but work in unison to achieve power over mankind through chaos. They seem to me to seek, First and Foremost, the Destruction of Christianity, Nationhood and Liberty...that was 'the design' which Lord Acton perceived behind the first of the tumults, the French Revolution, and it has become clearer with later tumults and growing success. This process does not appear to me a natural or inevitable one, but a man‑made one which follows definite rules of conspiratorial action. I believe there is an organization behind it of long standing, and that the great successes which have been achieved are mainly due to the efficiency with which this has been kept concealed." [288]
Time will shortly demonstrate to even the most skeptical the identity of these conspirators who are endeavoring through chaos to enslave mankind. The center of this great world‑wide conspiracy to destroy Christendom, are those who crucified the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Their plans are carefully laid for the seizure of His inheritance, the first steps in the fulfillment of such a program evidenced in the Zionist claims to a right to Palestine which they have undertaken to possess through acts of violence (which began when Esau sold his birthright to Jacob).
Furthermore, in their arrogance they have assumed a messianic mission for their race and in so doing are undertaking to usurp the kingly prerogatives of Christ, or Lord and King. The verdict of our Lord is therefore just in its condemnation of these conspirators and their attempt through violence to seize the Kingdom.
[1] Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 75.
[2] Matthew 23:1‑39.
[3] Matthew 21:43.
[4] Jeremiah 50:4‑6.
[5] Acts 13:44‑47.
[6] John 8:41.
[7] Luke 2:19.
[8] Numbers 21:19‑20.
[9] Deuteronomy 33:7.
[10] 1 John 1:5.
[11] 1 John 4:8.
[12] Romans 11:22.
[13] Psalm 141:5.
[14] Proverbs 9:8.
[15] Galatians 4:16.
[16] 1 Chronicles 5:1‑2.
[17] Genesis 15:18.
[18] Ezeekiel 48:7.
[19] Jeremiah 3:18.
[20] Isaiah 11:12‑13.
[21] Jeremiah 50:4‑6.
[22] Jeremiah 33:14.
[23] Matthew 21:19, 43.
[24] Daniel 11:14.
[25] Genesis 48:16.
[26] Ruth 4:11.
[27] Jeremiah 33:14.
[28] Hebrews 8:8.
[29] Ezekies 37:19.
[30] John 8:32‑33.
[31] John 8:33.
[32] Matthew 23:15.
[33] Matthew 23:20‑35.
[34] Luke 19:14.
[35] Luke 19:27.
[36] 2 Kings 18:13.
[37] Ezra 9; 10; Nehimah 13:23‑29.
[38] See Sabeans Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 403.
[39] Genesis 10:7; 1 Chronicles 1:9; comp. Ezekiel 27:22; 38:13.
[40] Genesis 10:28; 1 Chronincles 1:22.
[41] Genesis 25:3; 1 Chronicles 1:32.
[42] Comp. the Ethiopian city of Saga mentioned by Strabo, Geography, p. 77.
[43] Genesis 25:15.
[44] Isaiah 21:14, comp. Jeremiah 25:23‑24.
[45] Pslam 62:15.
[46] Comp. Jeremiah 6:20.
[47] Ezekiel 27:22.
[48] 1 Kings 10:10; 2 Chronicles 9:1‑9; see Sheba, Queen Of.
[49] Matthew 12:42; Luke 11:31.
[50] Comp. Genesis 10:7; 1 Chronicles 1:9.
[51] Geography, ed. M�ller, pp. 768, 778, 780.
[52] Jewish Encyclopedia, pp. 608‑610.
[53] Jeremiah 24:1.
[54] Esther 8:17.
[55] H.G. Wells, Outline of History.
[56] Oregon Journal, December 9, 1954.
[57] NJO, February� 8, 1957.
[58] Jewish Voice, December 20, 1957.
[59] American Examiner, September 26, 1957.
[60] L.A. Times, July 20, 1960.
[61] Los Angeles Times, February 2, 1962.
[62] Do you see now why the government cannot stop the drug traffic?
[63] Los Angeles Times, April 4, 1963.
[64] Jewish Post & Opinion. August 17, 1972.
[65] New York Daily News, November 15, 1972.
[66] Sacramento Union, December 22, 1973.
[67] Think about it: Time after time the Jews make movies portraying our Lord Jesus Christ as a Queer. How can ANY thinking Christian possibly believe these are God's People HOW STUPID CAN CHRISTIANS BE?
[68] Tribune Review, November 16, 1976.
[69] Jewish Press, May 13, 1977.
[70] Jewish Press, November 25, 1977.
[71] L.A. Herald Examiner, June 24, 1977.
[72] Jewish Press, November 25, 1977.
[73] Jewish Press, November 25, 1977.
[74] John 8:44.
[75] John 16:2.
[76] Art. V, Sec. 3.
[77] Matthew 7:23.
[78] Acts 1:15.
[79] John 19:21.
[80] John 19:22.
[81] Gr. titlos, John 19:19.
[82] John 19:21‑22.
[83] Matthew 27:37 with v. 39.
[84] Luke 23:35.
[85] The Puritan Ethic and the American Revolution, Edmund Morgan, William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 24, p. 17.
[86] Fifty Years In the Church of Rome, p. 289‑291.
[87] Little has been published about the early life of Abraham Lincoln. However, during a search of some old property records and will in a small courthouse in central North Carolina, Alex Christopher the author of "Pandora's Box,"; in one of the old will books dated around 1840, he found the will of one A.A. Springs. Upon reading the will he was shocked and amazed at the secret that it disclosed, but one must remember that it is a known fact that wills, even though they are classified public records the same as property and corporation records, they are rarely combed through as he was doing at the time, and these records hold many dark secrets that can be hidden in public view, but are never uncovered because there are very few who research these old records.
����� This practice of hiding secrets in public view and the conspirators can say, when faced with the facts and accused of concealing the records; they can reply "Well it was there in the public record in plan view for any and all to find." In the will of A.A. Springs was the list of his property. it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included his children. Mr. Christopher and others were looking to find what railroads and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son Leroy Springs. He didn't find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century. On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father, A.A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher and the others with him couldn't believe what they were seeing, but there it was the name of the son and it was "ABRAHAM LINCOLN!"
����� This new information that they had about the Springs (real name Springstein) family, this was just another twist to add to the already manipulative family. This new information about Lincoln built a fire under them to see where this new lead would take them, because everything they had found in the railroad and banking saga had been areal mind-bender. They figured this one would be the same; so they inquired at the local archives and historical records on families and found a reference to one Abraham Lincoln in the family genealogy of the family of the Carolina by the name of McAdden, in a published genealogy on the family. The family members in the Carolinas were in a limited edition that at one time could be found in the public libraries. The section on Lincoln and the story went something like the following:
���� "In the late spring of the year of 1808 Nancy Hanks, who was of the family lineage of the McAdden family was visiting some of her family in the community of Lincolnton, North Carolina. While on her stay with family in the Carolina', she vistaed with many of the neighboring families that she had known for many years; one such visit was the Springs family. The sordid details had been omitted but obviously the young Nancy Hanks had found herself in a compromised position and was forced to succumb to the lust of A.A. Springs. She became pregnant as a result. There were no details of a love affair or an act of violence on a helpless female. Abraham Lincoln was the result of that act, which leads one to wonder if the name Lincoln was real or a fabricated name for the are of conception was Lincolnton. Was there really a Thomas Lincoln? Since the Spring were of the race that called themselves Jewish, that made Lincoln part Jewish and as part of the Springs family, he also became a relative of the Rothschild family by blood."
����� The following information was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United States and Europe:
���� "Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room. What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the royal European personage?
���� It seems that the practice of promiscuity was running rampant in many families in those days and the German King Leopold had, had an illegitimate daughter named Elizabeth who was sent to America, where she lived in a very comfortable manner. Although Leopold could not recognize her position, he was very interested in her life.
���� In the early or mid 1850s, Abraham Lincoln and Elizabeth began having sexual liaisons that produced twin daughters named Ella and Emily in 1856. The regal German father who was so royally up-set with ol' honest Abe probably had full knowledge of what the true blood line of Lincoln really was. Abraham's wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella and Emily until 1865. Previous to being informed about Elizabeth and the twins, Mrs. Lincoln had developed a ravaging dependency on opium. Her main supplier of the drug was a former member of the Confederate Intelligence community, he was a former member because the Southern gentlemen did not approve of his drug pushing and unreliable behavior. It was because of his involvement with the Souther Intelligence Community, Mary's supplier - John Wilks Booth - knew about the lover and the illegal twins.
���� After being spurned by the Confederate intelligence community, Mary's 'candy man' approached and became involved with the Rothschild Empire of Europe, for he realized the European banking moguls would be very interested in his pipeline to the White House.
���� (At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the North and South AFTER the Civil War ended. The issue needed to be popular to all levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars and Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history. Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were trying to take control of the entire world monetary system, and at that time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America and find a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that were gaining control in this country through government help...
���� Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia Company covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal families of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now what Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in favor of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their family bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs and stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family companies in the early 1920s...
���� (But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of the Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and then dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted President was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.
��� The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after with plenty of opium. Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.
���� The plotters decided the Presidential snatch needed to take place in a public, yet discreet location where minimum witnesses would be present. There were too many potential witnesses at the White House. Two hours before the capture was to take place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum, because Abe had decided not to go out of the White House that night. Mary's outrageous outburst caused Abe to change his mind and the First family departed. Several minutes after arriving at the kidnap location, Mary instructed the family bodyguard to take a position that placed the First Family out of his visual sight. The position also required the bodyguard to traverse several flights of stairs to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed for any reason...A wagon with a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of the kidnap location with several men including Mary's opium supplier. The plan was for the drug pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently move down a hallway, and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary and Abe were sitting.
���� After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean. When Booth actually opened the door to the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door...When she was sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the lower left earlobe of her husband.
���� Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did not know if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth with the kidnapping or there to point the false finger at the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to find out the answer to that question. The only escape route was to jump the balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.
���� In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they would use a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to the victim. The gun on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her husband.
���� In the 1860s, an act of Congress mandated the compensation of widows of former and active Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents and Presidents. The mouth and duration was ratified by both Houses of Congress for each widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her widowers compensation three times and was denied the mandated compensation three times by both Houses of Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for Mary's passage to Europe where she died in small cottage in Germany.
���� In 1867, the Secret Service was founded so that drunken municipal law enforcement could not unwittingly participate with drug-addicted First Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow killings of philandering Presidents of the United States. (To cover up the murders committed which would reflect a bad light for the presiding Administration, such as the Foster murder is doing at the present time).
���� Before Booth jumped out of the balcony of the Presidential Box of the Ford Theater, he shouted at General Riley and his wife who were sitting to the right-front of the Lincolns. Booth's words expressed his innocence but also sealed the fate of the Rileys. Within a week of the shooting, General Riley and his wife were packed off to an insane asylum where they both died of 'unknown causes' within 30 days of being committed." (Pandora's Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286).
[88] Fifty Years In the Church of Rome, pages 297‑299.
[89] The Mad Booths of Maryland.
[90] "Who can sum up the horrors and woes accumulated in a single war? War comes with its bloody hand into our very dwellings. Takes from ten thousand homes those who lived there in peace and comfort, held by the tender ties of family and kindred. It drags them away, to die untended, of fever or exposure, in infectious climes; or to be hacked, torn, and mangled in the fierce fight; to fall on the gory field, to ruse no more, or to be borne away, in awful agony, to noisome and horrid hospitals. The groans of the battle-field are echoed in sighs of bereavement from thousands of desolated hearths. There is a skeleton in every house, a vacant chair at every table. Returning, the soldier brings worse sorrow to his home, by the infection which he has caught, of camp-vices. The country is demoralized. The national mind is brought down, from the noble interchange of kind offices with another people, to wrath and revenge, and base pride, and the habit of measuring brute strength against brute strength, in battle. Treasures are expended, that would suffice to build ten thousand churches, hospitals, and universities, or rib and tie together a continent with rails of iron. If that treasure were sunk in the sea, it would be calamity enough; but it is put to worse use; for it is expended in cutting into the veins and arties of human life, untilo the earth is deluged with a sea of blood...
���� At times, the baleful fires of war light up half a Continent at once; as when all the Thrones unite to compel a people to receive again a hated and detestable dynasty, or States deny States the right to dissolve an irksome union and create for themselves a separate government. Then again the flames flicker and die away, and the fire smoulders in its ashes, to break out again, after a time, with renewed and a more concentrated fury. At times, the storm, revolving, howls over small areas only; at times its lights are seen, like the old beacon-fires on the hills, belting the whole globe. No sea, but hears the roar of cannon; no river, but runs red with blood; no plain, but shakes, trampled by the hoofs of charging squadrons; no field, but is fertilized by the blood of the dead; and everywhere man slays, the vulture gorges, and the wolf howls in the ear of the dying soldier. No city is not tortured by shot and shell; and no people fail to enact the horrid blasphemy of thanking a God of Love for victories and carnage. The Deums are still sung for the Eve of St. Bartholomew and the Sicilian Vespers. Man's ingenuity is racked, and all his inventive powers are tasked, to fabricate the infernal enginery of destruction, by which human bodies may be the more expeditiously and effectually crushed, shattered, torn, and mangled; and yet hypocritical Hunaity, drunk with blood and drenched with gore, shrieks to Heaven at a single murder, perpetrated to gratify a revenge not more unchristian, or to satisfy a cupidity and not more ignoble, than those which are the promptings of the Devil in the souls of Nations.
���� When we have fondly dreamed of Utopia and the Millennium, when we have begun almost to believe that man is not, after all, a tiger half tamed, and that the smell of blood will nto wake the savage within him, we are of a sudden startled from the delusive dream, to find the think mask of civilization rent in twain and trown contemptuously away. We lie down to sleep, like the peasant on the lava-slopes of Vesuvius. The mountain has been so long inert, that we believe its fires extinguished. Round us hang the clustering grapes, and the green leaves of the olive tremble in the soft night-air over us. Above us shine the peaceful, patient stars. Teh crash of a new eruption wakes us, the roar of the subterranean thunders, the stabls of the volcanic lightning into the shrouded bosom of the sky; and we see, aghast, the tortured Titan hurling up its fires among the pale stars, its great tree of smoke and cloud, the red torrents pouring down its sides. The roar and the shriekings of Civil War are all around us: the land is a pandemonium: man is again a Savage. The great armies roll along their hideous waves, and leave behind them smoking and depopulated deserts. The pillager is in evey house, plucking even the morsel of bread fromt he lips of the starving child. Gray hairs are dabbled in blood, and innocent girlhood shrieks in vain to Lust for mercy. Laws, Courts, Constitutions, Christianity, Mercy, Pity, disappear. God seems to have abdicated,a nd Moloch to reign in His stead; while Press and Pulpit alike exult at universal murder, and urge the extermination of the Conquered, by the sword and the flaming torch; and to plunder and murder entitles the human beasts of prey to the thanks of Christian Senates.
���� Commercial greed deadens the nerves of sympathy of Nations, and makes themd eaf to the demands of honor, the impulses of generosity, the appeals of those who suffer under injustice. Elsewhere, the universla pursuit of wealth dethrones God and pays divine honors to Mammon and Baalzebub. Selfishness rules supreme: to win wealth becomes the whole business of life. The villanies of legalized gaming and speculation become epidemci; treahcery is but evidence of shrewdness; office becomes the prey of successful faction; the Country, like Actaeon, is torn by its own hounds, and the villains it has carefully educated to their trade, most greedily plunder it, when it is in extremis." (Alberty Pike, Morals and Dogma, pp. 124, 2970298).
[91] Henry Savage, Jr., Seeds of Time, The Background of Southern Thinking, New York, N.Y. 1959, p. 62.
[92] Henry Savage, Jr., Seeds of Time, The Background of Southern Thinking, p. 82.
[93] John C. Calhoun, Nullifier (Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1949). 31f.
[94] Margaret L. Coit, John C. Calhoun, American Portriat (Boson, Massassachusetts, 1950), p. 27.
[95] Margaret L. Coit, John C. Calhoun, American Portrait, p. 508.
[96] Margaret L. Coit, John C. Calhoun, American Portrait, p. 509.
[97] Romans 8:28.
[98] "To study and seek to interpret correctly the symbols of the Universe, is the work of the sage and philosopher. It is to decipher the writing of God, and penetrate into His thoughts...To hold the full cup of thought to the thirsty lips of men; to give to all the true ideas of Deity; to harmonize conscience and science, are the province of Phiosophy. Morality is Faith in full bloom. Contemplation should lead to action, and the absolute be practical; the ideal be made air and food and drink to the human mind. Wisdom is a sacred communion. It is only on that condition that it ceases to be a sterile love of Science, and becomes the one and supreme method by which to unit Humanity and arose it to concerted action. Then Philosophy becomes Religion...
���� Plato, writing to Dionysius the Younger, in regard to the nature of the First Principle, says: 'I must write to you in engimas, so that if my letter be intercepted by land or sea, he who shall read it may in no degree comprehend it.' And then he says, 'All things surround their King; they are, on account of Him, and He alone is the cause of good things, Second for the Seconds and Third for the Thirds.' There is in these few words a complete summary of the Theology of the Sephiroth. "The King" is Ainsoph, Being Supreme and Absolute. From this center, which is everywhere, all things ray forth; but we especially conceive of it in three manners and in three different spheres. IN the Divine world (Aziluth), which is that of the First Cause, and wherein the whole Eternity of Things in the beginning existed as Unity, to be afterward, during Eternity uttered forth, clothed with form, and the attributes that constitute them matter, the First Principle is Single and First, and yet not the Very Illimitable Deity, incomprehensible, undefinable; but Himself in so far as manifested by the Creative Thought. To compare littleness with infinity, Arkwright, as inventor of the spinning-jenny, and not the man Arkwright otherwise and beyond that. All we can know of the Very God is, compared to His Wholeness, only as an infinitesimal fractio of a unit, compared with an infinity of Units.
���� In the World of Creation, which is that of Secand Causes (The Kabbalistic World Briah), the Autocracy of the First Principle is complete, but we conceive of it only as the Cause of the Second Causes. Here it is manifested by the Binary, and is the Creative Principle passive. Finally: in the third world, Yezirah, or of Formation, it is revelaed in the perfect Form, the Form of Forms, the World, the Supreme Beauty and Excellence, the Created Perfection. Thus the Principle is at once the First, the Second, and the Third, since it is All in All, the Center and Cause of all. It is not the genius of Plato that we here admire. We recognize only the exact knowledge of the Initiate. The great Apostle Saint John did not borrow from the philosophy of Plato the opening of his Gospel. Plato, on the contrary, drank at the same springs with Saint John and Philo; and John in the opening verses of his paraphrase, states the first principles of a dogma common to many schools, but in language especially belonging to Philo, whom it is evident he had read. The philosophy of Plato, the greates of human Revealers, could yearn toward the Word made man; the Gospel alone could give him to the world...
���� The Deity of the early Hebrews talked to Adam and Eve in the garden of delight, as he walked in it in the cool of the day; he conversed with Kayin; he sat and ate with Abraham in his tent' that patriarch required a visible token, before he would believe in his positive promise; he permitted Abraham to expostulate with him, and to induce him to change his first determination in regard to Sodom; he wrestled with Jacog; he showed Moses his person, though not his face; he dictated the minutest police regulations and the dimensions of the tabernacle and its furniture, to the Israelites; he insisted on and delighted in sacrifices and burnt-offerings; he was angry, jealous, and revengeful, as well as wavering and irresolute; he allowed Moses to reason him out of his fixed resolution utterly to destroy is people; he commanded the performance of the most shocking and hideous acts of cruelty and barbarity. He hardened the heart of Pharaoh; he repented of the evil that he had said he would do unto the people of Nineveh; and he did it not, to the disgust and anger of Jonah. Such were the popular notions of the Deity; and either the priests had none better, or took little trouble to correct these notions; or the populare intellect was not enough enlarged to enable them to entertain any higher conceptions of the Almighty.
���� Such were the popular notions of the Deity; and either the priests had none better, or took little trouble to correct these notions; or the popular intellect was not enough enlarged to enable them to entertain any higher conceptions of the Almighty. But such were not the ideas of the intellectual and enlightened few among the Hebrews. It is certain that they possessed a knowledge of the true nature and attributes of God; as the same class of men did among the other nations; Zoroaster, Menu, Confucius, Socrates, and Plato. But their doctrines on this subject were esoteric; they did not communicate them to the people at large, but only to a favored few; and as they were communicated in Egypt and India, in Persia and Phoenicia, in Greece and Samothrace, in the greater mysteries, to the Initiates...
���� The religion taught by Moses, which, like the laws of Egypt, enunciated the principle of exclusion, borrowed, at every period of its existence, from all the creeds with which it came in contact. While, by the studies of the learned and wise, it enriched itself with the most admirable principles of the religions of Egypt and Asia, it was changed, in the wanderings of the People, by everything that was most impure or seductive in the pagan manners and superstitions. It was one thing in the times of Moses and Aaron, another int hose of David and Solomon, and still another in those of Daniel and Philo. At the time when John the Baptist made his appearance in the desert, near the shores of the Dead Sea, all the old philsophical and religious systems were approximating toward each other. A general lassitude inclined the minds of all toward the quietude of that amalgamation of doctrines for which the expeditions of Alexander and the more peaceful occurrences that followed, with the establishment in Asia and Africa of many Grecian dynasties and a great number of Grecian colonies, had prepared the way. After the intermingling of different nations, which resulted fromt he wars of Alexander in three-quarters of the globe, the doctrines of Greece, of Egypt, of Persia and of India, met and intermingled everywhere. All the barriers that had formerly kept the nations apart, were thrown down; and while the People of the West readily connected their faith with those of the East, those of the Orient hastened to learn the traditions of Rome and the legends of Athens. While the Philosophers of Greece, all (except the disciples of Epicurus) more or less Platonists, seized eargerly upon the beliefs and doctrines of the East, the Jews and Egyptians, before then the most exclusive of all peoples, yielded to that eclecticism which prevailed among their masters, the Greeks and Romans....
���� The spirit of the Vedas (or sacred Indian Books, of great antiquity), as understood by their earliest as well as most recent expositors, is decidedly a pantheistic monotheism; one God, and He all in all (this would be true because the founders of India were the sons of Abraham by Keturah, and by his concubines; therefore they would have knowledge of the One True God); the many divinities, numerous as the prayers addressed to them, being resolvable into the titles and attributes of a few, and ultmately into The One. The machinery of personification was understood to have been unconsciously assumed as a mere expedient to supply the deficiencies of language; and the Mimansa just considered itself as only interpreting the true meaning of the Mantras, when it proclaimed that, in the beignning, 'Nothing was but Mind, the Creative Thought of Him which existed alone from the beginning, and breathed without afflation.' The idea suggested in the Mantras is dogmatically asserted and developed in the Upanischadas. The Vedanta philosophy, assuming the mystery of the 'One in Many' as the fundamental article of faith, maintained not only the Divine Unity, but the identity of matter and spirit. The unity which it advocates is that of mind. Mind is the Universal Element, the One God, the Great Soul, Mahaatma. He is the material as well as efficient cause, and the world is a texture of which he is both the web and weaver. He is the Macrocosmos, the universal organism called Pooroosha, of which Fire, Air, and Sun are only the chief members. His head is light, his eyes the sun and moon, his breath the wind, his voice the opened Vedas. All proceeds from Brahm, like the web from the spider and the grass from the earth...The great aim of reason is to generalize; to discover unity in multiplicity, order in apparent confusion; to separate from the accidental and the transitory, the stable and universal. In the contemplation of Nature, and the vague, but almost intuitive perception of a general uniformity of plan among endless varieties of operation and form, arise those solemn and reverential feelings, which, if accompanied by intellectual activity, may eventually ripen into philosophy...
���� The unseen beingor beings revealed only to the Intellect became the theme of philosophy; and their more acident symbols, if not openly discredited, were passed over with evasive generality, as beings respecting whose problematical existence we must be 'content with what has been reported by those ancients, who, assuming to be their descendants, must therefore be supposed to have been well acquainted with their own ancestors and family connections.' And the Theism of Anaxagoras was still more decidely subversive, not only of Mythology, but of the whole religion of outward nature; it being an appeal from the world without, to the consciousness of spiritual dignity within man....Thus the philosophic sentiment came to be associated with the poetical and the religious, under the comprehensive name of Love. Before the birth of Philosophy, Love had received but scanty and inadequate homage. This mightiest and most ancient of gods, coeval with the existence of religion and of the world, had been indeed unconsciously felt, but had neither been worthily honored nor directly celebrated in hymn or paeon. In the old days of ignorance it could scarcely have been recognized. In order that it might exercise its proper influence over religion and philosophy, it was necessary that the God of Nature should cease to be a God of terrors, a personfication of mere Power or arbitrary Will, a pure and stern Intelligence, an inflictor of evil, and an unrelenting Judge. The philosophy of Plato, in which this charge became forever established, was emphatically a mediation of Love. With him, the inspiration of Love first kindled the light of arts and imparted them to mankind; and not only the art of mere existence, but the heavenly art of wisdom, which supports the Universe. It inspires high and generous deeds and noble self-devotion. Without it, neither State nor individual could do anything beautiful or great Love is our best pilot, confederate, supporter, and saviour; the ornament and governor of all things human and divine; and he with divine harmany forever soothes the minds of men and gods...
���� This metaphysical direction given to philosophy ended in visionary extravagance. Having assumed truth to be discoverable in thought, it proceeded to treat thoughts as truths. It thus became an idolatry of notions, which it considered either as phantoms exhaled from objects, or as portions of the divine pre-existent thought; thus creating a mythology of its own, and escaping from one thraldom only to enslave itself afresh. Theories and notions indiscriminately formed and defended are the false gods or 'idols' of philosophy. For the word idolon means image, and a false mind-picture of God is as much an idol as a false wooden image of Him. Fearlessly launching into the problem of universal being, the first philosophy attempted to supply a compendious and decisive solution of every doubt. To do this, it was obliged to make the most sweeping assumptions; and as poetry had already filled the vast void between the human and the divine, by personifying its Deity as man, so philosophy bowed down before the supposed reflection of the divine image in the mind of the inquirer, who, in worshipping his own notions, had unconscously deified himself. Nature thus was enslaved to common notions, and notions very often to words." (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, pp. 7, 20, 99, 207, 247, 673, 678, 691, 693).
[99] Grady McWhiney, Cracker Culture: Celtic Ways in the Old South (University of Alabama Press, 1988), pp. 16-22. He then treats the reader to a delicious banquet of cultural traits that characterize Southerners; and Celts, to this day. Southerners betray their Celtic origins in their affection for oral history, ballads, romanticizing womanhood, exaggerated sense of honor (resulting in frequent duels and a propensity for violence), an undue affection for distilled spirits, affection for meat (especailly port), preference for hunting over agricultural toil; in short, just about a perfect description of Southern culture, with the single exception of religion.
[100] Alexander H. Stephens, The War Between the States (reprinted by Sprinkle Publications, 576 Harrisonburg, VA [1868] 1994). The full text constitutes a part of the regular proceedings of the Virginia House of Delegates for 1798, and reiterated in the General Session of 1799-1800.
[101] Alexander H. Stephens, The War Between the States, pp. 578-590.
[102] "Seneca, comparing Philosophy to initiation, says that the most sacred ceremonies could be known to the adepts alone: but that many of their precepts were known even to the Profane. Such was the case with the doctrine of a future life, and a state of rewards and punishments beyond the grave. The ancient legislators clothed this doctrine in the pomp of a mysterious ceremony, in mystic words and magical representations, to impress upon the mind the truths they taught, by the strong influence of such scenic displays upon the senses and imagination.
���� In the say way they taught the origin of the soul, its fall to the earth past the spheres and through the elements, and its final return to the place of its origin (this doctrine is directly from the Jewish Kabbalah or Cabala), when, during the continuance of its union with earthly matter, the sacred fire, which formed its essence, had contracted no stains, and its brightness had not been marred by foreign particles, which, denaturalizing it, weighed it down and delayed its return. These metaphysical ideas, with difficulty comprehending by the mass of the Initiates, were represented by figures, by symbols, and by allegorical analogies; no idea being so abstract that men do not seek to give it expression by, and translate it into, sensible images...This was the great Mystery of the Ineffable Name; and this true arrangement of its letters, and of course its true pronunciation and its meaning, soon became lost to all except the select few to whom it was fonfided; it being concealed from the common people, because the Deity thus metaphysically named was not that personal and capricious, and as it were tangible God in whom they believed, and who alone was within the reach of their rude capacities..." (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, pp. 385, 700).
[103] Robert L. Dabney, Discussions, Secular (c. 1897, S.B. Ervin, Mexico, MO., Re-printed 1979 by Sprinkle Publications, Harrisonburg, VA).
[104] "In the management of the New World we give proof of our organization both for revolution and for construction by the creation of the League of Nations, which is our (Jews) work. Bolshevism is the accelerator, and the League of Nations is the brake on the mechanism of which we supply both the motive force and the guiding power...What is the end? That is already determined by our mission." (Comte de St. Aulaire); "The modern Socialist movement is in great part the work of the Jews, who impress on it the mark of their brains; it was they who took a preponderant part in the directing of the first Socialist Republic...The present world Socialism forms the first step of the accomplishment of Mosaism, the start of the realization of the future state of the world announced by our prophets. It is not till there shall be a League of Nations; it is not till its Allied Armies shall be employed in an effective manner for the protection of the feeble that we can hope that the Jews will be able to develop, without impediment in Palestine, their national State; and equally it is only a League of Nations penetrated with the Socialist spirit that will render possible for us the enjoyment of our international necessities, as well as our national ones..." (Dr. Alfred Nossig, Intergrales Judentum).
[105] Charles L.C. Minor, M.A., LL. D., The Real Lincoln, (Everett Waddey Company, reprinted by Sprinkle Publications, Harrisonberg, VA, 1992). Minor collated materials only from among historians contemporary with Lincoln, and concludes Lincoln was "an infidel, and 'when he went to church, he went to mock and came away to mimic' (Lamar's Life of Lincoln, p. 487)..." "Dr. Holland in his Abraham Lincoln, says (p. 286) that twenty out of twenty-three ministers of the different denominations of Christians, and a very large majority of the prominent members of the churches in his home, Springfield, Illinois, opposed him for President. He says (p. 241), 'Men who knew him throughout his professional and political life' have said 'that, so far from being a religious man, or a Christian, the less said about that the better.'" The biographies Monor quotes are not generally considered anti-Lincoln. IN fact, many are considered quite flattering; however, they clearly paint a different picture than the one we currently are likely to view in modern tratments. "Hapgood's Lincoln (p. 291) records that the pious words with which the Emancipation Proclamation closes were added at the suggestion of Secretary Chase, and so does Usher (Reminiscences of Lincoln, p. 91), and so does Rhodes; and Rhodes shows him 'an infidel, if not an atheist,' and adds, 'When Lincoln entered politicallife he became reticent upon his religious opinions.' (History of the United States, Vol. IV, p. 213)...Leland says (Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II, p. 55): ...'It is certaint hat after the unpopularity of free thinkers had forced itself upon his mind, the most fervidly passionate expressions of piety to abound in his speeches.'" Shelby Foote's PBS Documentary "The Civil War" also briefly makes this point.
[106] Jackson remained an inspiration, even in death, to Christians of the South.
[107] Burke Davis, Gray Fox (The Fairfax Press, New York, 1956), pp. 9-10.
[108] Robdrty L. Dabney, Discussions, Secular, p. 3.
[109] Robert L. Dabney, Discussions, Secular, p. 6.
[110] "The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the High [Jewish] Financial Powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid of the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the Jewish financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self‑providing. Therefore, they started their emissaries to work in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.
���� They made the rupture between the North and the South imminent! The master of finance in Europe made this rupture definitive in order to exploit it to the utmost. Lincoln's personality surprised them. His candidature did not trouble them; they though to easily dupe the candidate woodcutter. But Lincoln read their plots and soon understood, that the South was not the worst foe, but the Jew financiers. He did not confide his apprehensions, he watched the gestures of the Hidden Hand; he did not wish to expose publicly the questions which would disconcert the ignorant masses.
���� And the Jews went anew to grab the riches of the world. I fear that Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, in order that 'the earth should become the inheritance of Israel.'" (La Vieille France, No. 216, March, 1921).
[111] A.T. Robertson, Life and Letters of John A. Broadus (Harrisonburg, VA 1987), p. 21.
[112] "As long as there remains among the Gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world shall not come...And the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have proved easier dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated to our future King of the World...
���� We have founded many secret associations, which all work for our purpose, under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honor, a great honor, for the Gentiles to join us in our organizations, which are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose.
���� One of the many triumphs of our Freemasonry is that those Gentiles who become members of our Lodges, should never suspect that we are using them to build their own jails, upon whose terraces we shall erect the throne of our Universal King of the Jews; and should never know that we are commanding them to forge the chains of their own servility to our future King of the World...
���� We have induced some of our children to join the Christian Body, with the explicit intimation that they should work in a still more efficient way for the disintegration of the Christian Church, by creating scandals within her. We have thus followed the advice of our Prince of the Jews, who so wisely said: 'Let some of your children become cannons, so that they may destroy the Church.' Unfortunately, not all among the 'convert' Jews have proved faithful to their mission. Many of them have even betrayed us! But, on the other hand, others have kept their promise and honored their word. Thus the counsel of our Elders has proved successful.
���� We are the Fathers of all Revolutions, even of those which sometimes happen to turn against us. We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War. We can boast of being the Creators of the Reformation! Calvin (Phillip II, by William Thomas Walsh, p. 248: 'The origin of Calvin (whose real name was Chauvin) See also: Lucin Wolf, in Transactions, Jewish Historical Society of England, Vol. XI, p. 8; Goris, Les Colonies Marchandes Meridionales � Anvers; Lea, History of the Inquisition of Spain, III, 413)) was one of our Children; he was of Jewish descent, and was entrusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the Reformation.
���� Martin Luther yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends unknowingly, and again, by Jewish authority, and with Jewish finance, his plot against the Catholic Church met with success. But unfortunately he discovered the deception, and became a threat to us, so we disposed of him as we have so many others who dare to oppose us...
���� Many countries, including the United States have already fallen for our scheming. But the Christian Church is still alive...We must destroy it without the least delay and without the slightest mercy. Most of the Press in the world is under our Control; let us therefore encourage in a still more violent way the hatred of the world against the Christian Church. Let us intensify our activities in poisoning the morality of the Gentiles. Let us spread the spirit of revolution in the minds of the people. They must be made to despise Patriotism and the love of their family, to consider their faith as a humbug, their obedience to their Christ as a degrading servility, so that they become deaf to the appeal of the Church and blind to her warnings against us. Let us, above all, make it impossible for Christians to be reunited, or for non-Christians to join the Church; otherwise the greatest obstruction to our domination will be strengthened and all our work undone. Our plot will be unveiled, the Gentiles will turn against us, in the spirit of revenge, and our domination over them will never be realized.
���� Let us remember that as long as there still remain active enemies of the Christian Church, we may hope to become Master of the World...And let us remember always that the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown..." (From a series of speeches at the B'nai B'rith Convention in Paris, published shortly afterwards in the London Catholic Gazette, February, 1936; Paris Le Reveil du Peuple published similar account a little later).
[113] Thomas Cary Johnson, The Life and Letters of Benjamin Morgan Palmer (Carlisle, PA 1987), p. 35.
[114] Luke 6:46.
[115] 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
[116] Anne C. Loveland, Southern Evangelicals and the Social Order 1800-1860 (Baton Rouge, LA 1980), p. 180-185.
[117] B.M. Palmer, The Life and Letters of James Henley Thornwell (Carlisle, PA 1974), p. 14.
[118] B.M. Palmer, The Life and Letters of James Henly Thronwell, p. 439.
[119] B.M. Palmer, The Life and Letters of James Henly, p. 439-440.
[120] "It is useless to insist upon the differences which proceed from this opposition between the two different views in the respective attitudes of the pious Jew and the pious Christian regarding the acquisition of wealth. While the pious Christian, who had been guilty of usury, was tormented on his death‑bed by the tortures of repentance and was ready to give up all that he owned, for the possessions unjustly acquired were scorching his soul, the pious Jews, at the end of his days looked with affection upon his coffers and chests filled to the top with the accumulated sequins taken during his long life from poor Christians and even from poor Moslems; a sight which could cause his impious heart to rejoice, for every penny of interest enclosed therein was like a sacrifice offered to his God." (Wierner Sombart, Les Juifs et la vie economique, p. 286; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 164)
[121]James Henly Thornwell, The Collected Writings of James Thornwell (Carlisle, PA, 1974), p. 556.
[122] B.M. Palmer, The Life and Letters of James Henley Thornwell, p. 507.
[123] Deuteronomy 27.
[124] Anne C. Loveland, Southern Evangelicals and the Social Order 1800-1860, p. 128.
[125] Steve Wilkins, America: The First 350 Years (Monroe, LA 1988), p. 153.
[126] Deuteronomy 7:9.
[127] Mary E. Hobard, The Secrets of the Rothschilds.
[128] London Times Editorial, 1865.
[129] See Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. I, New York: Harper & Brothers Pub., (1912).
[130] Proverbs 22:7.
[131] Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. V, (1912).
[132] Anton Chaitkin, Treason in America, 2d ed. (1985) p. 234.
[133] Anton Chaitkin, Treason in America, 2d ed. (1985) p. 225.
[134] Anton Chaitkin, Treason in America, p. 245.
[135] Anton Chaitkin, Treason in America, p. 224.
[136] Weep No More My Lady, W.E. Debnam, Graphic Press, Raleigh, NC 1950, p. 41.
[137] Keynes, War Cycles/Peace Cycles, p. 201.
[138] Adams Diary, August 11, 1835. Quoted in Virginia's Attitude Toward Slaver, p. 178. Note the international scope of the campaign.
[139] Memoir of Margaret Mercer, Morris, p. 126.
[140] A South Side View Of Slavery, Adams, p. 108.
[141] The Origin of the Late War, Lunt, p. 104.
[142] See Otto Scott's The Secret Six, Times Books, 3 Park Ave. NY 10016.
[143] The Civil War and the Constitution, Burgess, Vol. 1, pp. 42‑44.
[144] Jews had financed and were the prominent leaders of the Bolshevik Revolutions of 1905 & 1917 which overthrew the Christian nation of Russia. Jews have been the creators of Marxism, Communism, and Socialism. Cf., The national Geographic, Vol. XVIII, No. 5, May 1907, p. 302; The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. XI (1905), p. 414.
[145] F.D.R. His Life and Times, Otis L. Graham, Jr., ed. (1985) p. 216.
[146] F.D.R. His Life and Times, Otis L. Graham, Jr., p. 217.
[147] This is America's Story, Howard B. Wilder, (1960) p. 508.
[148] United States vs. Diekelman, 2 Otto (92 U.S.) 520, 526 (1875).
[149] (Wortham vs. Walker, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145; 133 Tex. 255 (1939).
[150] Thorington vs. Smith, 8 Wallace (75 U.S.) 1, 9 (1868).
[151] 14 Statutes at Large 812, 813 (April 2, 1866); 814, 817 (August 20, 1866).
[152] Documents Illustrative, p. 139. Spoken at the Constitutional Convention.
[153] State vs. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695, 699; 285 Minn. 51. State vs. Rowe, 26 N.W.2d 422, 429; 238 Iowa 237. State vs. Johnson, 230 So. 2d 825, 830; 255 La. 314. Butler vs. State, 212 So.2d 573, 577.
[154] 109 Dukes v. State, 137 S.E. 2d 532; 109 Ga. App. 825; People vs. Ward, 196 N.W.971; 226 Mich. 45; State vs. Mobley, supra, 105.
[155] 110 State vs. Mobley, 83 S.E.2d 100, 102.
[156] 111 State vs. Gum, 69 S.E. 463, 464; 68 W.Va. 105 (1910).
[157] 113 People vs. Hevern, 127 Misc. 141; 215 N.Y.S. 417; McGovern vs. Van Riper, 43 A.2d 514, 521; 137 N.J. Eq. 24 (1924).
[158] 114 Gow vs. Bingham, 107 N.Y.S. 1011, 1014‑15; 57 Misc. 66 (1907).
[159] 115 Bednarik vs. Bednarik, 16 A.2d 80, 90; 18 N.J. Misc. 633 (1940).
[160] Declaration of Independence, 1776.
[161] City of New York vs. Miln, 11 Peters (36 U.S.) 102, 139 (1837).
[162] Revelation 12:15.
[163] 2 Corinthians 4:2, Ephesians 2:2.
[164] 2 Timothy 2:15.
[165] Matthew 24:5, 11, 24‑25.
[166] 2 Thessalonians 2:8‑11.
[167] Matthew 23:33‑38, John 8:37‑45.
[168] Ezra 2:62, 9:1‑2, Nehimah 7:64, 12:23‑30
[169] Ant. Book 13, ch. 9 par. 1.
[170] Josephus Ant. Book 13, ch. 11, par. 3
[171] Josephus Antiquities Book 13, chapter 15, paragraph 4.
[172] Josephus Ant. Book 14, ch. 15, p. 2.
[173] The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 81.
[174] The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 46.
[175] The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 135.
[176] The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 178.
[177] The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 93.
[178] Sermon xxix, in Migne, Partologoia latina, Vol. CLXXXII.
[179] Anti‑Semitism Throughout the Ages, p. 131.
[180] God's First Love, p. 37.
[181] St. Jerome, quoted in Anti‑Semitism Throughout the Ages, p. 125.
[182] Oratio in Christi Resurrectionem, p. 52.
[183] Letter XI. to the Emperor Theodosius.
[184] Thy Brothers Keeper, p. 30.
[185] Honorius III to the Archbishop of Toledo, November 21, 1221.
[186] Gregory IX to the King of Navarre, 1234, Amador De Los Rios, I, 362, II. 22, 197.
[187] Jeremiah 32:31‑32.
[188] Jeremiah 29:8‑19.
[189] Ezekiel 12:10‑14.
[190] Jeremiah 39:1‑8.
[191] 2 Kings 17:6.
[192] 2 Kings 18:11.
[193] 2 Kings 18:13.
[194] Jeremiah 40:7.
[195] Jeremiah 29:14.
[196] Jeremiah 24:6
[197] John 5:23.
[198] John 5:37‑38.
[199] John 5:42‑43.
[200] John 6:45.
[201] John 8:19.
[202] John 8:54‑55.
[203] Jeremiah 50:1‑5.
[204] 2 Esdras 13:39‑46.
[205] Malachi 1:1‑4.
[206] Ezekiel 11:15.
[207] Ezekiel 36:2‑5.
[208] Daniel 9:24.
[209] Jeremiah 50:4.
[210] Isaiah 3:8‑9.
[211] Hosea 2:6‑7.
[212] According to #1168 of Strong's Exhaustive Concordance the word lord here should be Baal, in other words the Jews god is Baal not Almighty God!
[213] Ezekiel 11:15.
[214] Joshua 15:63.
[215] 2 Chronicles 21:11.
[216] Ezekiel 15:6.
[217] Passing Empires by Maspero.
[218] Jeremiah 29:5‑6.
[219] Ezra 9:1‑2, 10:10, 13:14 Nehemiah 13:23‑26.
[220] Nehemiah 13:23‑25.
[221] Jeremiah 6:1.
[222] Luke 21:20‑22.
[223] Matthew 24:15.
[224] Jeremiah 24:9‑10.
[225] John 8:42‑44.
[226] Mark 7:7‑9.
[227] Matthew 27:25.
[228] Jeremiah 24:8
[229] Genesis 4:11‑12.
[230] Acts 26:7.
[231] Ezekiel 4:6.
[232] Daniel 9:24‑27.
[233] Matthew 27:25.
[234] John 19:15.
[235] Matthew 21:43.
[236] Jeremiah 24:8‑10.
[237] Ezekiel 16. Compare this with Revelations and the great whore Mystery Babylon.
[238] Numbers 6:22, 27.
[239] Isaiah 62:2.
[240] Isaiah 65:15.
[241] Genesis 12:3.
[242] Jeremiah 24:9.
[243] Genesis 3:15.
[244] Matthew 23:29‑35.
[245] Revelation 18:24.
[246] St. John Chrysostom by W.R. Stephens p 133.
[247] Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the six founding fathers designated to draw up The Declaration of Independence. He spoke before the Constitutional Congress in May 1787, and asked that Jews be barred from immigrating to America. The above are his exact words as quoted from the diary of General Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.
[248] Psalms 52:1‑5.
[249] Jeremiah 4:15‑16, 18, 30.
[250] Ant. xiii
[251] Ant. xiii Jubilees, Book of, and Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs.
[252] Ant. xiii.
[253] Ant. xiv.
[254] The Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 666.
[255] Matthew 16:1‑3.
[256] Matthew 16:5‑7.
[257] Matthew 16:8‑12.
[258] John 8:44.
[259] John 15:20‑21.
[260] Psalms 69:4‑21.
[261] #4863 Strong's Concordance.
[262] #4864 Strong's Concordance p. 68.
[263] #4686 Strong's Concordance.
[264] Matthew 27:24‑35 and Mark 15:15‑24.
[265] Acts 2:14‑36.
[266] Acts 4:1‑10.
[267] Acts 5:17‑30.
[268] Matthew 21:12‑13.
[269] Matthew 21:33.
[270] Isaiah 5:1‑7. See also Psalms 80:8, Jeremiah 6:9, Hosea 10:1 and Joel 1:7, 12.
[271] Matthew 21:34‑39.
[272] Matthew 23:1‑3.
[273] Matthew 21:43.
[274] Matthew 21:40‑46.
[275] Matthew 23:34.
[276] John 15:20‑24.
[277] Timothy 4.
[278] Matthew 23:13‑33.
[279] 1 John 4:1.
[280] Luke 20:20.
[281] Matthew 8:28‑29.
[282] Matthew 24:5.
[283] Acts 21:27‑28.
[284] Acts 17:5‑7.
[285] John 11:47‑48.
[286] Jeremiah 23.
[287] See Matthew 21:33‑46.
[288] Smoke to Smother, p. 315.